[openstack-dev] [tc] Question about electorate for project without gerrit contribution
anteaya at anteaya.info
Tue Mar 15 20:39:40 UTC 2016
On 03/15/2016 04:25 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/15/2016 08:22 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
>> However, at the risk of sounding like a humorless automaton, we have a valid
>> * Monty Taylor for Packaging-Deb PTL https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292690/
> This started as a joke. Please don't pick-up the joke, and make it a
> serious proposal. This isn't funny anymore.
> Obviously, Monty isn't interested (otherwise, he would have help with
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264726/, which he didn't despite his
> generous offer to do so in Tokyo but he had other priorities).
> Also again, please have a look at the openstack-pkg-tools Git history here:
> There's at least 3 commits a week on this repository.
> Now, compare this to the single commit to add a .gitreview file from Monty:
> That's also a commit on the Liberty branch, and we've switched to
> debian/mitaka a long time ago.
>> Also by the rules I feel like we have no choice but to reject
>> * Adding Packaging-Deb/Thomas_Goirand.txt
> I know we have established governance rules. They exist for a reason.
> Though I hope everyone understand what happened after my explanation.
> I believe what you wanted to write is:
> "If we don't think first and follow the rules without even trying to
> understand, we *WOULD* reject. But we are humans with brains, not
> machines, therefore, it's ok"
> Because *you do* have a choice, don't you?
ATC definition is in the bylaws: section 3:
Eligibility for PTL and the electorate is covered in the charter:
And this resolution:
Election officials administer elections according to the rules as outlined.
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
More information about the OpenStack-dev