[openstack-dev] [tc] Question about electorate for project without gerrit contribution
zigo at debian.org
Tue Mar 15 20:25:47 UTC 2016
On 03/15/2016 08:22 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> However, at the risk of sounding like a humorless automaton, we have a valid
> * Monty Taylor for Packaging-Deb PTL https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292690/
This started as a joke. Please don't pick-up the joke, and make it a
serious proposal. This isn't funny anymore.
Obviously, Monty isn't interested (otherwise, he would have help with
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264726/, which he didn't despite his
generous offer to do so in Tokyo but he had other priorities).
Also again, please have a look at the openstack-pkg-tools Git history here:
There's at least 3 commits a week on this repository.
Now, compare this to the single commit to add a .gitreview file from Monty:
That's also a commit on the Liberty branch, and we've switched to
debian/mitaka a long time ago.
> Also by the rules I feel like we have no choice but to reject
> * Adding Packaging-Deb/Thomas_Goirand.txt
I know we have established governance rules. They exist for a reason.
Though I hope everyone understand what happened after my explanation.
I believe what you wanted to write is:
"If we don't think first and follow the rules without even trying to
understand, we *WOULD* reject. But we are humans with brains, not
machines, therefore, it's ok"
Because *you do* have a choice, don't you?
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
More information about the OpenStack-dev