[openstack-dev] [nova] Wishlist bugs == (trivial) blueprint?
mzoeller at de.ibm.com
Tue Mar 15 15:49:42 UTC 2016
Chris Dent <cdent+os at anticdent.org> wrote on 03/15/2016 03:23:42 PM:
> From: Chris Dent <cdent+os at anticdent.org>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 03/15/2016 03:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Wishlist bugs == (trivial)
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > We do have a way for people to drop off RFEs/ideas for features
> > actually providing design details, which is the backlog specs:
> In what universe is writing a backlog spec walking up and dropping
> an idea?
> It's not necessarily a bad thing to have that level of friction, but
> it is something we should be aware of.
Having 2 channels to communicate an idea, both with different levels
of friction, the easier one will be used. And that's the bug list.
Instantly closing new "wishlist" bugs in the future leaves one channel
open. The friction of that channel is fine IMO.
> My take is that if we do have that level of friction then influence, in
> its many forms, will solely be mediated by the vendors that consume the
> upstream OpenStack community, or people who have the wherewithal to
> become embedded in the community. Is that fully healthy?
I don't understand this, could you rephrase it please?
> Chris Dent (¨s¡ã¡õ¡ã)¨s¦à©ß©¥©ß
> freenode: cdent tw:
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z)
More information about the OpenStack-dev