Open Stack

Le 09/03/2016 23:41, Matt Fischer a écrit :
> This is not the first time. Monasca and Murano had a collision too[1]. 
> When this happens the changes trickle down into automation tools also 
> and complicates things.
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1505785


IMHO, all that info has to be standardized in the Service Catalog. 
That's where endpoint informations can be found for a specific service 
type and that's the basement for cross-project communication.

FWIW, there is one cross-project spec trying to clean-up the per-project 
bits that are not common 
https://github.com/openstack/openstack-specs/blob/master/specs/service-catalog.rst 


I'm torn between 2 opinions :
  - either we consider that all those endpoints are (or should be - for 
those which aren't) manageable thru config options, and thus that's not 
a problem we should solve. Any operator can then modify the ports to 
make sure that two conflicting big-tent projects can work together.
  - or, we say that it can be a concern for interoperability, and then 
we should somehow ensure that all projects can work together. Then, a 
documentation link isn't enough IMHO, we should rather test that.




>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Xav Paice <xavpaice at gmail.com 
> <mailto:xavpaice at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     From an ops point of view, this would be extremely helpful
>     information to share with various teams around an organization. 
>     Even a simple wiki page would be great.
>
>     On 10 March 2016 at 10:35, Fei Long Wang <feilong at catalyst.net.nz
>     <mailto:feilong at catalyst.net.nz>> wrote:
>
>         Hi all,
>
>         Yesterday I just found cloudkitty is using the same default
>         port (8888) which is used by Zaqar now. So I'm wondering if
>         there is any rule/policy for those new services need to be
>         aware. I googled but can't find anything about this. The only
>         link I can find is
>         http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/firewalls-default-ports.html.
>         So my question is should we document the default ports list on
>         an official place given the big tent mode? Thanks.
>
>         -- 
>         Cheers & Best regards,
>         Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
>         --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         Senior Cloud Software Engineer
>         Tel: +64-48032246 <tel:%2B64-48032246>
>         Email: flwang at catalyst.net.nz <mailto:flwang at catalyst.net.nz>
>         Catalyst IT Limited
>         Level 6, Catalyst House, 150 Willis Street, Wellington
>         --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>         __________________________________________________________________________
>         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>         Unsubscribe:
>         OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>         <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160310/2e156b38/attachment.html>