Open Stack

+1 from me.   I am all for standardizing this.

Personally when I started looking at OpenStack code as new contributor this
was very confusing with the online docs that listed run_tests.sh but the
first project I looked at, this didn't exist and it was all tox based.

I went on to blog about my first experience of tox, as this was lacking in
OpenStack docs.

Ronald



On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Steve Martinelli <stevemar at ca.ibm.com>
wrote:

> The keystone team did the same during Liberty while we were moving towards
> using oslo.* projects instead of oslo-incubator [0]. We also noticed that
> they were rarely used, and we did not go through a deprecation process
> since these are developer tools. We're still finding a few spots in our
> docs that need updating, but overall it was an easy transition.
>
> [0]
> https://github.com/openstack/keystone/commit/55e9514cbd4e712e2c317335294355cf1596d870
>
> stevemar
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Flavio Percoco ---2016/03/04 06:51:47
> AM---Hey Folks, I'm looking at doing some cleanups in our repo]Flavio
> Percoco ---2016/03/04 06:51:47 AM---Hey Folks, I'm looking at doing some
> cleanups in our repo and I would like to start by
>
> From: Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com>
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Cc: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> Date: 2016/03/04 06:51 AM
> Subject: [Openstack-operators] [glance] Remove `run_tests.sh` and
> `tools/*`
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> I'm looking at doing some cleanups in our repo and I would like to start by
> deprecating the `run_tests` script and the contents in the `tools/` dir.
>
> As far as I can tell, no one is using this code - we're not even using it
> in the
> gate - as it was broken until recently, I believe. The recommended way to
> run
> tests is using `tox` and I believe having this script in the code base
> misleads
> new contributors and other users.
>
> So, before we do this. I wanted to get feedback from a broader audience
> and give
> a heads up to folks that might be using this code.
>
> Any objections? Something I'm missing?
>
> Flavio
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
> [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Steve Martinelli/Toronto/IBM]
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160304/e4a60bd5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160304/e4a60bd5/attachment.gif>