Open Stack

Hi, Lucas,

Thank you for your correspondence.

> I think we meant UEFI >= 2.4 there. 
That make sence!

> Apparently in the UEFI version 2.4 some feature was introduced that is required for the boot from volume
> case.
>
Which function of UEFI 2.4 do you point to?
It would be very helpful if you could point me which part of specifications[1] it is.

Is it 10.11/10.12 or(and) others of the specifications[1]?

[1] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_2.4.pdf

Best regards
Daisuke Fujita


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Alvares Gomes [mailto:lucasagomes at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 7:59 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 3/6
> 
> Hi Daisuke,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Fujita, Daisuke
> <fuzita.daisuke at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Jim, Julia, and Ironicers,
> >
> > I have some questions about the BFV.
> >
> >> >     * Hardware supports the UEFI 2.4 spec
> >
> > Could you please explain the reason that chose version not 2.5/2.6/2.3.1 but 2.4?
> > In the etherpad[1], I was not able to read the reason why ironicers chose version 2.4.
> >  [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-mitaka-midcycle
> >
> 
> I think we meant UEFI >= 2.4 there. Apparently in the UEFI version 2.4
> some feature was introduced that is required for the boot from volume
> case.
> 
> Hope that helps,
> Lucas
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev