Open Stack

On Wednesday 02 of March 2016 12:24:57 Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> Sean,
> 
> I do understand why we have tempest for python-cinderclient now.
> 
> But my point is: tempest runs more than 200 tests per each cinderclient
> change request which takes a lot of time. Why can't we just introduce few
> integration tests which will tests nova<=>python-cinderclient API.
> 
> Also, Nova is not only one consumer of cinderclient. What about Heat? We
> don't want to break it too but to run all Heat-related Tempest tests is not
> a good idea. We have to implement integration tests between Heat and
> python-cinderclient too.

So you want to reimplement the tests you already have in Tempest? If the issue 
is the time, why not run a relevant subset of the tempests tests?

Ciao
-- 
Luigi