Hi! On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Alex Schultz <aschultz at mirantis.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < > vkozhukalov at mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Dear colleagues, >> >> I'd like to suggest to replace Fuel-ostf with Rally. Rally is quite >> popular project and as far as I know it has all necessary features >> (including dashboard). We only need to implement testing scenarios. >> >> In particular the suggestion is as follows >> >> 1) Implement necessary testing scenarios to achieve feature parity with >> Fuel-ostf (including those which test Fuel HA features). >> 2) Prepare necessary rpm/deb packages (Rally itself + scenarios) >> 3) Modify Fuel-qa so it uses Rally instead of Fuel-ostf. >> 4) Deprecate Fuel-ostf (including removal of ostf tab on UI). I'd prefer >> Fuel users to rely on Rally user interface (both CLI and dashboard). >> >> What do you think? Are there any volunteers to implement this? >> >> > I thought Rally was more for benchmarking. Wouldn't Tempest make more > sense? > > Rally is not only about benchmarking, it provides a flexible interface which allows to do whatever you want:) > -Alex > > >> >> Vladimir Kozhukalov >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Best regards, Andrey Kurilin. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160627/80dd3758/attachment.html>