Open Stack

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net>
wrote:

> Removing the pbr branch should be fine - it was an exceptional thing
> to have that branch in the first place - pbr is consumed by releases
> only, and due to its place in the dependency graph is very very very
> hard to pin or cap.
>

Based off this I have removed the stable/kilo branch from pbr.

Cheers,
Josh



>
> -Rob
>
> On 25 June 2016 at 12:37, Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:36:03PM -0700, Sumit Naiksatam wrote:
> >> Hi Tony, Thanks for your response, and no worries! We can live with
> >> the kilo-eol tag, no need to try to delete it. And as you suggested,
> >> we can add a second eol tag when we actually EoL this branch.
> >>
> >> As regards reviving the deleted branches, would a bug have to be
> >> created somewhere to track this, or is this already on the radar of
> >> the infra team (thanks in advance if it already is)?
> >
> > No bug needed.  I'll work with the infra team to re-create the branch.
> Just as
> > a level set it wont be this weekend.
> >
> > Yours Tony.
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160627/0fbce7d7/attachment.html>