[openstack-dev] [all] Status of the OpenStack port to Python 3
Sean McGinnis
sean.mcginnis at gmx.com
Thu Jun 23 20:19:52 UTC 2016
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:58:23PM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 from me as well. I get questions on support for these often enough.
> +1 from me as well Doug! ("community to set a goal for Ocata to have Python
> 3 functional tests running for all projects.")
>
> -- Dims
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2016-06-22 10:49:01 +0200:
> >> On 06/22/2016 09:18 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Current status: only 3 projects are not ported yet to Python 3:
> >> >
> >> > * nova (76% done)
> >> > * trove (42%)
> >> > * swift (0%)
> >> >
> >> > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3
> >> >
> >> > Number of projects already ported:
> >> >
> >> > * 19 Oslo Libraries
> >> > * 4 Development Tools
> >> > * 22 OpenStack Clients
> >> > * 6 OpenStack Libraries (os-brick, taskflow, glance_store, ...)
> >> > * 12 OpenStack services approved by the TC
> >> > * 17 OpenStack services (not approved by the TC)
> >> >
> >> > Raw total: 80 projects. In fact, 3 remaining projects on 83 is only 4%,
> >> > we are so close! ;-)
> >> >
> >> > The next steps are to port the 3 remaining projects and work on
> >> > functional and integration tests on Python 3.
> >> >
> >> > Victor
> >>
> >> Hi Victor,
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for your efforts on Py3.
> >>
> >> Do you think it looks like possible to have Nova ported to Py3 during
> >> the Newton cycle?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
> >>
> >
> > I'd like for the community to set a goal for Ocata to have Python
> > 3 functional tests running for all projects.
> >
> > As Tony points out, it's a bit late to have this as a priority for
> > Newton, though work can and should continue. But given how close
> > we are to having the initial phase of the port done (thanks Victor!),
> > and how far we are from discussions of priorities for Ocata, it
> > seems very reasonable to set a community-wide goal for our next
> > release cycle.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list