Open Stack

Somehow, this thread hid from me for a couple of weeks.  I just
reviewed something relevant to this here [1].  It proposes adding
tenant id to segment.  But, it also enforces that tenant id is the
same as that of the network owning the segment.  So, I say why store
it at all?

I would argue that subnet should also not have a tenant_id and should
just inherit it from the network.

Carl

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331497/2/neutron/db/segments_db.py

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Henry Gessau <HenryG at gessau.net> wrote:
> Carl Baldwin <carl at ecbaldwin.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Henry Gessau <HenryG at gessau.net> wrote:
>>> Darek Smigiel <smigiel.dariusz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> strange, that owner is not able to just get rid of *his* network and subnets.
>>>
>>> But not all the subnets are his, and consequently the network is partially not
>>> his.
>>
>> To me, this is a nonsensical outcome and tells me that subnets
>> probably shouldn't really have owners distinct from the network's.
>
> Right. So are you saying we should prevent that?
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev