[openstack-dev] [nova] [api] [placement] strategy for placement api structure

Sylvain Bauza sbauza at redhat.com
Fri Jun 17 21:38:27 UTC 2016

Le 17/06/2016 18:11, Dean Troyer a écrit :
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Sylvain Bauza <sbauza at redhat.com 
> <mailto:sbauza at redhat.com>> wrote:
>     In the review, you explain why you don't trust Routes and I
>     respect that. That said, are those issues logged as real problems
>     for our API consumers, which are mostly client libraries that we
>     own and other projects we know, like Horizon ?
> I feel a bit compelled to say that the assumption that the API 
> consumers are mostly 'our code' is a faulty one and not true.  Just 
> within the collection of client projects in the openstack/ repo 
> namespace, there are at least 4 different codebases talking to compute 
> endpoints.
> I'm not picking on you Sylvain, this is just something that I think 
> needs periodic reinforcement among our developer community.

No worries at all, Dean. Thanks for explaining your opinion. To be 
clear, I used "we" for saying "We are OpenStack", ie. an excellent 

> dt
> -- 
> Dean Troyer
> dtroyer at gmail.com <mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160617/097c7d57/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list