[openstack-dev] [nova] Let me know if you have an approved spec but unapproved blueprint

Timofei Durakov tdurakov at mirantis.com
Tue Jun 14 08:17:19 UTC 2016


Hi

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-compute-compute-communication
- bp is not approved, but the spec is.

Timofey

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:47 AM, joehuang <joehuang at huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi, Matt,
>
> Thank you for the clarification.
>
> Best Regards
> Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:07 AM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let me know if you have an approved
> spec but unapproved blueprint
>
> On 6/12/2016 7:48 PM, joehuang wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This spec is not approved yet:
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295595/
> >
> > But the BP is approved:
> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/expose-quiesce-unquiesce-a
> > pi
> >
> > Don't know how to deal with the spec now. Is this spec killed? Should
> Nova support application level consistency snapshot for disaster recovery
> purpose or not?
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 9:08 PM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let me know if you have an approved
> > spec but unapproved blueprint
> >
> > I've come across several changes up for review that are tied to Newton
> blueprints which have specs approved but the blueprints in launchpad are
> not yet approved.
> >
> > If you have a spec that was approved for Newton but your blueprint in
> launchpad isn't approved yet, please ping me (mriedem) in IRC or reply to
> this thread to get it approved and tracked for the Newton release.
> > It's important (at least to me) that we have an accurate representation
> of how much work we're trying to get done this release, especially with
> non-priority feature freeze coming up in three weeks.
> >
>
> Neither the spec nor the blueprint is approved. The blueprint was
> previously approved in mitaka but is not for newton, with reasons in the
> spec review for newton.
>
> At this point we're past non-priority spec approval freeze so this isn't
> going to get in for newton. There are a lot of concerns about this one so
> it's going to be tabled for at least this release, we can revisit in ocata,
> but it adds a lot of complexity and it's more than we're willing to take on
> right now given everything else planned for this release.
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160614/5a5309f2/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list