[openstack-dev] [puppet] Discussion of PuppetOpenstack Project abbreviation
sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com
Fri Jun 3 07:34:49 UTC 2016
I would vote for POSM - "Puppet OpenStack Modules"
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Cody Herriges <cody at herriges.org> wrote:
> > On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:56 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 06/01/2016 02:20 PM, Jason Guiditta wrote:
> >> On 01/06/16 18:49 +0800, Xingchao Yu wrote:
> >>> Hi, everyone:
> >>> Do we need to give a abbreviation for PuppetOpenstack project? B/C
> >>> it's really a long words when I introduce this project to people or
> >>> writng article about it.
> >>> How about POM(PuppetOpenstack Modules) or POP(PuppetOpenstack
> >>> Project) ?
> >>> I would like +1 for POM.
> >>> Just an idea, please feel free to give your comment :D
> >>> Xingchao Yu
> >> For rdo and osp, we package it as 'openstack-puppet-modules', or OPM
> >> for short.
> > I definitely love POM as it reminds me of pomeranians :) but I agree
> that OPM will probably be easier recognizable.
> The project's official name is in fact "Puppet OpenStack" so OPM would be
> kinda confusing. I'd put my vote on POP because it is closer to the actual
> definition of an acronym, which I generally find easier to remember over
> all when it comes to the shortening of long phrases.
>  http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev