Open Stack

I would vote for POSM - "Puppet OpenStack Modules"

--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Cody Herriges <cody at herriges.org> wrote:

>
> > On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:56 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/01/2016 02:20 PM, Jason Guiditta wrote:
> >> On 01/06/16 18:49 +0800, Xingchao Yu wrote:
> >>>  Hi, everyone:
> >>>
> >>>      Do we need to give a abbreviation for PuppetOpenstack project? B/C
> >>>  it's really a long words when I introduce this project to people or
> >>>  writng article about it.
> >>>
> >>>      How about POM(PuppetOpenstack Modules) or POP(PuppetOpenstack
> >>>  Project) ?
> >>>
> >>>      I would like +1 for POM.
> >>>      Just an idea, please feel free to give your comment :D
> >>>  Xingchao Yu
> >>
> >> For rdo and osp, we package it as 'openstack-puppet-modules', or OPM
> >> for short.
> >
> > I definitely love POM as it reminds me of pomeranians :) but I agree
> that OPM will probably be easier recognizable.
>
> The project's official name is in fact "Puppet OpenStack" so OPM would be
> kinda confusing.  I'd put my vote on POP because it is closer to the actual
> definition of an acronym[1], which I generally find easier to remember over
> all when it comes to the shortening of long phrases.
>
> [1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym
>
> --
> Cody
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160603/498f5532/attachment.html>