[openstack-dev] [kolla] repo split

Ryan Hallisey rhallise at redhat.com
Wed Jul 27 16:07:24 UTC 2016


Agreed, it's been a week. The vote can be brought up again when
the conclusion of N is closer.

-Ryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" <stdake at cisco.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 11:46:44 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] repo split

Martin,

Thanks for your feedback.  This vote has expired without a consensus.  I
think we need to try a new vote once the core team gets comfortable with
the backporting process I spoke about earlier in a different thread this
vote would likely pass.

Regards
-steve

On 7/27/16, 3:09 AM, "Martin André" <m.andre at redhat.com> wrote:

>On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com>
>wrote:
>> I am voting -1 for now, but would likely change my vote after we branch
>> Newton.  I'm not a super big fan of votes way ahead of major events
>>(such
>> as branching) because a bunch of things could change between now and
>>then
>> and the vote would be binding.
>>
>> Still community called the vote - so vote stands :)
>
>IIUC, if split there is, it's scheduled for when we branch out Newton
>which is only 1 month ahead.
>
>I'm +1 on splitting ansible deployment code into kolla-ansible.
>
>Martin
>
>> Regards
>> -steve
>>
>>
>> On 7/20/16, 1:48 PM, "Ryan Hallisey" <rhallise at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hello.
>>>
>>>The repo split discussion that started at summit was brought up again at
>>>the midcycle.
>>>The discussion was focused around splitting the Docker containers and
>>>Ansible code into
>>>two separate repos [1].
>>>
>>>One of the main opponents to the split is backports.  Backports will
>>>need
>>>to be done
>>>by hand for a few releases.  So far, there hasn't been a ton of
>>>backports, but that could
>>>always change.
>>>
>>>As for splitting, it provides a much clearer view of what pieces of the
>>>project are where.
>>>Kolla-ansible with its own repo will sit along side kolla-kubernetes as
>>>consumers of the
>>>kolla repo.
>>>
>>>The target for the split will be for day 1 of Occata. The core team will
>>>vote on
>>>the change of splitting kolla into kolla-ansible and kolla.
>>>
>>>Cores please respond with a +1/-1 to approve or disapprove the repo
>>>split. Any community
>>>member feel free to weigh in with your opinion.
>>>
>>>+1
>>>-Ryan
>>>
>>>[1] - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-N-midcycle-repo-split
>>>
>>>________________________________________________________________________
>>>__
>>>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>Unsubscribe: 
>>>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> 
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>_
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: 
>>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list