Open Stack

Michael Still wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov
> <mailto:Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov>> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>     The issue is, as I see it, a parallel activity to one of the that is
>     currently accepted into the Big Tent, aka Containerized Deployment
>
>
> [snip]
>
> This seems to be the crux of the matter as best as I can tell. Is it
> true to say that the concern is that Kolla believes they "own" the
> containerized deployment space inside the Big Tent?
>
> Whether to have competing projects in the big tent was debated by the TC
> at the time and my recollection is that we decided that was a good thing
> -- if someone wanted to develop a Nova replacement, then let them do it
> in public with the community. It would either win or lose based on its
> merits. Why is this not something which can happen here as well?

For real, I (or someone) can start a nova replacement without getting 
rejected (or yelled at or ...) by the TC saying it's a competing 
project??? Wow, this is news to me...

>
> I guess I should also point out that there is at least one other big
> tent deployment tool deploying containerized openstack components now,
> so its not like this idea is unique or new. Perhaps using kubernetes
> makes it different somehow, but I don't see it.
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rackspace Australia
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev