Open Stack

Hi,

testing against stable release of horizon doesn't have any sense of me.
when you have tests running against master and them are almost always
passing it's much easier to found commit that caused a failure and fix the
problem that it's introduced. anyway, it's great news that FF is moved a
week earlier for horizon, thanks!

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Rob Cresswell <
robert.cresswell at outlook.com> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> So we've had a few issues with plugin stability recently, and its apparent
> that many plugins are building off Horizon master as a dependency. I would
> really advise against this. A more manageable development process may be to:
>
> - Base stable plugins against a stable release of Horizon
> - Base WIP versions/new plugins off the last Horizon milestone, b2 in this
> case, and then bump the version and capture issues within the same patch.
> This should prevent random breakages, and should allow you to just look at
> the release notes for that milestone.
>
> On the Horizon side, we've moved our FF a week earlier, so I think that
> week combined with the usual RC period should be enough time to fix bugs.
> We'll aim to make sure our release notes are complete with regards to
> breaking issues for plugins, and deprecate appropriately.
>
> Rob
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Vitaly Gridnev,
Project Technical Lead of OpenStack DataProcessing Program (Sahara)
Mirantis, Inc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160720/8f7e9a8f/attachment.html>