Open Stack

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Michael Still <mikal at stillhq.com> wrote:
> On 16 Jul 2016 1:27 PM, "Thomas Herve" <therve at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov> wrote:
>> > The lack of Instance Users has caused lots of projects to try and work
>> > around the lack thereof. I know for sure, Mangum, Heat, and Trove work
>> > around the lack. I'm positive others have too. As an operator, it makes me
>> > have to very carefully consider all the tradeoffs each project made, and
>> > decide if I can accept the same risk they assumed. Since each is different,
>> > thats much harder.
>>
>> Instance users would be nice. Nobody just provided a good solution. I
>> know you tried, but I don't think you succeeded. We need a good
>> implementation, easy to understand, and maybe this will move forward.
>
> I think I need a more complete definition of instance users to know what
> you're talking about here. Is this the instance locking stuff Bruno proposed
> a while ago?

I believe this is what's Kevin talks about:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222293/

-- 
Thomas