[openstack-dev] [Openstack] Naming polls - and some issues
Joshua Hesketh
joshua.hesketh at gmail.com
Mon Jul 18 04:03:05 UTC 2016
Hello Ian,
My understanding of it is that you need to receive a new link. Monty is
slowly sending those out in batches and he hasn't finished. I expect he'll
email the list once he has finished to confirm so I'd suggest holding off
until then to check.
Cheers,
Josh
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today I tried to vote the naming polls for P and Q releases, however,
> unfortunately I am experiencing some issues.
>
> I used the link for P release in the e-mail titled "Poll: OpenStack P
> Release Naming" on July 11 22:42 UTC.
> When I click my URL, the poll site says:
> "Error / Your voter key is invalid. You should have received a correct URL
> by email."
> , and the poll is not ended yet. However I have not received any other
> correct URLs by e-mail.
>
> For Q release, I followed the link in the e-mail: "Poll: OpenStack Q
> Release Naming" on July 12 02:15 UTC.
> When I go to my vote URL, the site says "Poll already ended".
> But strangely, when I see the poll result (
> http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_06e681ae091ad657 ),
> all the poll candidates are 'tied'.
>
> So my questions are:
>
> 1) Does anybody have troubles on voting P and Q release naming like me?
>
> 2) Has the Q release naming poll already finished?
> I think it can be finished although the original due date is July 20th.
> However It is so strange that the result I am seeing now is "tied".
>
>
> With many thanks,
>
> /Ian
>
>
> Monty Taylor wrote on 7/18/2016 10:03 AM:
>
>> Any time is a good time.
>>
>> On 07/17/2016 04:54 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>>
>>> So, is now a good time to mention that "Quamby" is the name of a local
>>> prison?
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Eoghan Glynn <eglynn at redhat.com
>>> <mailto:eglynn at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > (top posting on purpose)
>>> >
>>> > I have re-started the Q poll and am slowly adding all of you fine
>>> folks
>>> > to it. Let's keep our fingers crossed that it works this time.
>>> >
>>> > I also removed Quay. Somehow my brain didn't process the "it
>>> would be
>>> > like naming the S release "Street"" when reading the original
>>> names.
>>> > Based on the naming critera, "Circular Quay" would be a great
>>> option for
>>> > "Circular" - but sadly we already named the C release Cactus. It's
>>> > possible this choice will make someone unhappy, and if it does,
>>> I'm
>>> > certainly sorry. On the other hand, there are _so_ many awesome
>>> names
>>> > possible in this list, I don't think we'll miss it.
>>>
>>> Excellent, thanks Monty for fixing this ... agreed that the
>>> remaining
>>> Q* choices are more than enough.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Eoghan
>>>
>>> > I'll fire out new emails for P once Q is up and going.
>>> >
>>> > On 07/15/2016 11:02 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
>>> > > Partially because its name is Circular Quay, so it would be like
>>> calling
>>> > > the S release Street for <insert arbitrary street name> Street.
>>> > >
>>> > > Having said that there are not that many of them and Sydney
>>> people know
>>> > > what you mean when you are going to the Quay.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 14 July 2016 at 21:35, Neil Jerram <neil at tigera.io
>>> <mailto:neil at tigera.io>
>>> > > <mailto:neil at tigera.io <mailto:neil at tigera.io>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Not sure what the problem would be with 'Quay' or 'Street' -
>>> they
>>> > > both sound like good options to me.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:29 AM Eoghan Glynn
>>> <eglynn at redhat.com <mailto:eglynn at redhat.com>
>>> > > <mailto:eglynn at redhat.com <mailto:eglynn at redhat.com>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > >> Hey all!
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> The poll emails for the P and Q naming have started
>>> to go
>>> > > out - and
>>> > > > >> we're experiencing some difficulties. Not sure at
>>> the
>>> > > moment what's
>>> > > > >> going on ... but we'll keep working on the issues
>>> and get
>>> > > ballots to
>>> > > > >> everyone as soon as we can.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > You'll need to re-send at least some emails,
>>> because the
>>> > > link I received
>>> > > > > is wrong - the site just reports
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > "Your voter key is invalid. You should have
>>> received a
>>> > > correct URL by
>>> > > > > email."
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Yup. That would be a key symptom of the problems. One
>>> of the
>>> > > others is
>>> > > > that I just uploaded 3000 of the emails to the Q poll
>>> and it
>>> > > shows 0
>>> > > > active voters.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I think maybe it needs a nap...
>>> > >
>>> > > Any chance we could remove "Quay" from the Q release
>>> naming poll
>>> > > before
>>> > > the links are fixed and the real voting starts?
>>> > >
>>> > > Otherwise we risk looking a bit silly, since "Quay" for
>>> the Q
>>> > > release
>>> > > would be somewhat akin to choosing "Street" for the S
>>> release ;)
>>> > >
>>> > > Cheers,
>>> > > Eoghan
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>>> questions)
>>> > > Unsubscribe:
>>> > >
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <
>>> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> > >
>>> <
>>> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> > >
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> > > Unsubscribe:
>>> > >
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <
>>> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> > >
>>> <
>>> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> > >
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Mailing list:
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>> > Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>> <mailto:openstack at lists.openstack.org>
>>> > Unsubscribe :
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <
>>> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rackspace Australia
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160718/675c8c42/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list