[openstack-dev] OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 12
Shinobu Kinjo
shinobu.kj at gmail.com
Sun Jul 10 04:50:58 UTC 2016
Thank you for you contribution.
Your modification has been applied on master.
Cheers,
Shinobu
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Luck Dog <dfhuangg at gmail.com> wrote:
> fine, thanks for your help throughout those days. I will conduct as you
> suggested. Today I can't successfully log onto the lanuchpad. There
> may be something wrong with the server. But I will try again tomorrow
> or later.
>
> Best Regards,
> Dongfeng
>
> 2016-07-06 5:55 GMT+08:00 <openstack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>:
>
>> Send OpenStack-dev mailing list submissions to
>> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> openstack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> openstack-dev-owner at lists.openstack.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of OpenStack-dev digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: [magnum][heat] Global stack-list for Magnum service user
>> (Fox, Kevin M)
>> 2. Quesion about Openstack Magnum (zhihao wang)
>> 3. Re: Quesion about Openstack Magnum (Adrian Otto)
>> 4. Re: New Python35 Jobs coming (Andreas Jaeger)
>> 5. [neutron][taas] IRC Meeting Canceled (week of 7/4/2016) (Anil Rao)
>> 6. [Charm][Congress] Upstreaming JuJu Charm for Openstack
>> Congress (SULLIVAN, BRYAN L)
>> 7. Re: [Cinder] Nominating Scott D'Angelo to Cinder core
>> (Walter A. Boring IV)
>> 8. Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Fail build request if we
>> can't inject files? (Matt Riedemann)
>> 9. Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Fail build request if we
>> can't inject files? (Matt Riedemann)
>> 10. Re: OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 9 (Shinobu Kinjo)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:02:43 +0000
>> From: "Fox, Kevin M" <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][heat] Global stack-list for
>> Magnum service user
>> Message-ID:
>> <1A3C52DFCD06494D8528644858247BF01B989C6E at EX10MBOX03.pnnl.gov>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> +1. Id like to see a similar thing for keystone validate user tokens.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kevin
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Johannes Grassler
>> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 2:43:47 AM
>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum][heat] Global stack-list for Magnum
>> service user
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Magnum has a periodic task that checks the state of the Heat stacks it
>> creates
>> for its bays. It does this across all users/tenants that have Magnum bays.
>> Currently it uses a global stack-list operation to query these Heat
>> stacks:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/openstack/magnum/blob/master/magnum/service/periodic.py#L83
>>
>> Now the Magnum service user does not normally have permission to perform
>> this operation,
>> hence the Magnum documentation currently suggests the following change to
>> Heat's policy.json:
>>
>> | stacks:global_index: "role:admin",
>>
>> This is less than optimal since it allows any tenant's admin user to
>> perform a
>> global stack-list. Would it be an option to have something like this in
>> Heat's
>> default policy.json?
>>
>> | stacks:global_index: "role:service",
>>
>> That way the global stack-list would be restricted to service users and
>> seting
>> Magnum (or other services that use Heat internally) wouldn't need a
>> change to
>> Heat's policy.json.
>>
>> If that kind of approach is feasible I'd be happy to submit a change.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Johannes
>>
>> --
>> Johannes Grassler, Cloud Developer
>> SUSE Linux GmbH, HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
>> GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
>> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160705/90780405/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:47:29 +0000
>> From: zhihao wang <wangzhihaocom at hotmail.com>
>> To: "openstack at lists.openstack.org" <openstack at lists.openstack.org>,
>> "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] Quesion about Openstack Magnum
>> Message-ID: <SNT148-W64BABE4E415E25555F8795AC390 at phx.gbl>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Dear Magnum team member
>>
>> May I ask you some question about Magnum
>> I have Openstack mistaka (1 controller and 2 compute nodes(I have
>> installed all the components for Magnum, also install the lbaaS V2.
>> I have install the Magnum followed this guide
>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/magnum/install-guide-from-source.html
>> and then I try to use Magnum, but I am not sure how to use it to create
>> k8s
>> when I try to list the bay model list, it return this, I source
>> admin-openrc, but still the same..
>> root at controller:/var/lib/magnum/magnum# magnum
>> --version2.0.0root at controller:/var/lib/magnum/magnum# magnum
>> servie-listERROR: You must provide a tenant name or tenant id via
>> --os-tenant-name, --os-tenant-id, env[OS_TENANT_NAME] or
>> env[OS_TENANT_ID]root at controller:/var/lib/magnum/magnum#
>> also , I saw lots of error from the magnum-api.log
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.239 85426 WARNING oslo_reports.guru_meditation_report
>> [-] Guru meditation now registers SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 by default for
>> backward compatibility. SIGUSR1 will no longer be registered in a future
>> release, so please use SIGUSR2 to generate reports.2016-07-05 11:45:47.240
>> 85426 INFO magnum.api.app [-] Full WSGI config used:
>> /etc/magnum/api-paste.ini2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 CRITICAL magnum [-]
>> ConfigFileValueError: Value for option host is not valid: controller is not
>> IPv4 or IPv6 address2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum Traceback
>> (most recent call last):2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/bin/magnum-api", line 10, in <module>2016-07-05
>> 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum sys.exit(main())2016-07-05 11:45:47.303
>> 85426 ERROR magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/magnum/cmd/api.py",
>> line 46, in main2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum host, port =
>> cfg.CONF.api.host, cfg.CONF.api.port2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR
>> magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_config/cfg.py",
>> line 3004, in __getattr__2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum
>> return self._conf._get(name, self._group)2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426
>> ERROR magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_config/cfg.py",
>> line 2615, in _get2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum value =
>> self._do_get(name, group, namespace)2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR
>> magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_config/cfg.py",
>> line 2658, in _do_get2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum % (
>> opt.name, str(ve)))2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum
>> ConfigFileValueError: Value for option host is not valid: controller is not
>> IPv4 or IPv6 address2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum ^C
>> I am wondering is there anything for configure the magnum?
>> thanks so much
>> wally
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160705/7ba9a50f/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 19:38:40 +0000
>> From: Adrian Otto <adrian.otto at rackspace.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Cc: "openstack at lists.openstack.org" <openstack at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Quesion about Openstack Magnum
>> Message-ID: <378870E8-9145-4F6B-A768-E42AEA7CA1E0 at rackspace.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Wally,
>>
>> We can help you by IRC in #openstack-containers on Freenode. I see you?re
>> in there getting help now. This mailing list is for development discussion,
>> so we?ll end this thread, and engage with you on IRC instead.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2016, at 11:47 AM, zhihao wang <wangzhihaocom at hotmail.com
>> <mailto:wangzhihaocom at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Magnum team member
>>
>> May I ask you some question about Magnum
>>
>> I have Openstack mistaka (1 controller and 2 compute nodes(
>> I have installed all the components for Magnum, also install the lbaaS V2.
>>
>> I have install the Magnum followed this guide
>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/magnum/install-guide-from-source.html
>>
>> and then I try to use Magnum, but I am not sure how to use it to create
>> k8s
>>
>> when I try to list the bay model list, it return this, I source
>> admin-openrc, but still the same..
>>
>> root at controller:/var/lib/magnum/magnum# magnum --version
>> 2.0.0
>> root at controller:/var/lib/magnum/magnum# magnum servie-list
>> ERROR: You must provide a tenant name or tenant id via --os-tenant-name,
>> --os-tenant-id, env[OS_TENANT_NAME] or env[OS_TENANT_ID]
>> root at controller:/var/lib/magnum/magnum#
>>
>> also , I saw lots of error from the magnum-api.log
>>
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.239 85426 WARNING oslo_reports.guru_meditation_report
>> [-] Guru meditation now registers SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 by default for
>> backward compatibility. SIGUSR1 will no longer be registered in a future
>> release, so please use SIGUSR2 to generate reports.
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.240 85426 INFO magnum.api.app [-] Full WSGI config
>> used: /etc/magnum/api-paste.ini
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 CRITICAL magnum [-] ConfigFileValueError:
>> Value for option host is not valid: controller is not IPv4 or IPv6 address
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum Traceback (most recent call
>> last):
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/bin/magnum-api", line 10, in <module>
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum sys.exit(main())
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/magnum/cmd/api.py",
>> line 46, in main
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum host, port =
>> cfg.CONF.api.host, cfg.CONF.api.port
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_config/cfg.py",
>> line 3004, in __getattr__
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum return
>> self._conf._get(name, self._group)
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_config/cfg.py",
>> line 2615, in _get
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum value = self._do_get(name,
>> group, namespace)
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum File
>> "/var/lib/magnum/env/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_config/cfg.py",
>> line 2658, in _do_get
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum % (opt.name, str(ve)))
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum ConfigFileValueError: Value
>> for option host is not valid: controller is not IPv4 or IPv6 address
>> 2016-07-05 11:45:47.303 85426 ERROR magnum
>> ^C
>>
>> I am wondering is there anything for configure the magnum?
>>
>> thanks so much
>>
>> wally
>> ________________________________
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160705/4e40e301/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 21:38:36 +0200
>> From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] New Python35 Jobs coming
>> Message-ID: <577C0CBC.5010506 at suse.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> On 07/05/2016 02:52 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > The change has merged and the python35 non-voting tests are run as part
>> > of new changes now.
>> >
>> > The database setup for the python35-db variant is not working yet, and
>> > needs adjustment on the infra side.
>>
>>
>> The python35-db jobs are working now as well.
>>
>> Happy Python35 testing,
>> Andreas
>> --
>> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
>> GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>> HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
>> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 20:09:45 +0000
>> From: Anil Rao <anil.rao at gigamon.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] IRC Meeting Canceled (week of
>> 7/4/2016)
>> Message-ID:
>> <
>> BY2PR1201MB10134409D11B9ABAFDFEF8B789390 at BY2PR1201MB1013.namprd12.prod.outlook.com
>> >
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This week's TaaS IRC meeting is being canceled since some of the team
>> members are planning to attend OpenStack Days in Tokyo. We will reconvene
>> next week as usual.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anil
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160705/2c850dcc/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 20:19:53 +0000
>> From: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131 at att.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Charm][Congress] Upstreaming JuJu Charm for
>> Openstack Congress
>> Message-ID:
>> <
>> 59A39E87EA9F964A836299497B686C354990A7F6 at CAFRFD1MSGUSRJD.ITServices.sbc.com
>> >
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been working in the OPNFV (https://wiki.opnfv.org/) on a JuJu Charm
>> to install the OpenStack Congress service on the OPNFV reference platform.
>> This charm should be useful for anyone that wants to install Congress for
>> use with an OpenStack deployment, using the JuJu tool. I want to get the
>> charm upstreamed as an official openstack.org git repo similar to the
>> other repos for JuJu Charms for OpenStack services. I participate in the
>> Congress team in OpenStack, who don't know the process for getting this
>> charm upstreamed into an OpenStack repo, so I am reaching out to anyone on
>> this list for help.
>>
>> I have been working with gnuoy on #juju and narindergupta on #opnfv-joid
>> on this. The charm has been tested and used to successfully install
>> Congress on the OPNFV Colorado release (Mitaka-based, re OpenStack). While
>> there are some features we need to continue to work on (e.g. Horizon
>> integration), the charm is largely complete and stable. We are currently
>> integrating it into the OPNFV CI/CD system through which it will be
>> regularly/automatically tested in any OPNFV JuJu-based deployment (with
>> this charm, Congress will become a default service deployed in OPNFV thru
>> JuJu).
>>
>> Any pointers on how to get started toward creating an OpenStack git repo
>> for this are appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:06:53 -0700
>> From: "Walter A. Boring IV" <walter.boring at hpe.com>
>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Scott D'Angelo to
>> Cinder core
>> Message-ID: <577C216D.9060809 at hpe.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>>
>> This is great! I know I'm a bit late to replying to this on the ML,
>> due to my vacation,
>> but I whole heartedly agree!
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Walt
>> On 06/27/2016 10:27 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>> > I would like to nominate Scott D'Angelo to core. Scott has been very
>> > involved in the project for a long time now and is always ready to help
>> > folks out on IRC. His contributions [1] have been very valuable and he
>> > is a thorough reviewer [2].
>> >
>> > Please let me know if there are any objects to this within the next
>> > week. If there are none I will switch Scott over by next week, unless
>> > all cores approve prior to then.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Sean McGinnis (smcginnis)
>> >
>> > [1]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Scott+DAngelo+%253Cscott.dangelo%2540hpe.com%253E%22+status:merged
>> > [2] http://cinderstats-dellstorage.rhcloud.com/cinder-reviewers-90.txt
>> >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 8
>> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:36:50 -0500
>> From: Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Fail build
>> request if we can't inject files?
>> Message-ID: <bb7726ee-7981-83a5-71af-84a891a1558d at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>>
>> On 7/4/2016 8:45 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> > On 7/4/2016 3:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Won't the user provided files also get made available by the config
>> >> drive /
>> >> metadata service ? I think that's the primary reason for file
>> >> injection not
>> >> being a fatal problem. Oh that and the fact that we've wanted to kill
>> >> it for
>> >> at least 3 years now :-)
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Daniel
>> >>
>> >
>> > Ugh, good point, except force_config_drive defaults to False and running
>> > the metadata service is optional.
>> >
>> > In the case of this failing in the tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ssh job,
>> > the instance is not created with a config drive, but the metadata
>> > service is running. Tempest doesn't check for the files there though
>> > because it's configured to expect file injection to work, so it ssh's
>> > into the guest and looks for the files.
>> >
>> > I have several changes up related to this:
>> >
>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1598581
>> >
>> > One is making Tempest disable file injection tests by default since Nova
>> > disables file injection by default (at least for the libvirt driver).
>> >
>> > Another is changing devstack to actually configure nova/tempest for file
>> > injection which is what the job should have been doing anyway.
>> >
>> > My nova fix is not going to fly because of config drive (which I could
>> > check from the virt driver) and the metadata service (which I can't from
>> > the virt driver). So I guess the best we can do is log something...
>> >
>>
>> I think I can still fail the server create from the libvirt driver if we
>> can't honor the request.
>>
>> For config drive, I can just check configdrive.required_by(instance)
>> like we normally do.
>>
>> For the metadata API, it's a bit uglier, but I could check if 'metadata'
>> is in CONF.enabled_apis and if not, and no config drive and files were
>> requested for injection but it's disabled, then we fail.
>>
>> How terrible is that?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt Riedemann
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 9
>> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:41:12 -0500
>> From: Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Fail build
>> request if we can't inject files?
>> Message-ID: <e8917a02-e4be-6da8-78fe-4858585f0abc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>>
>> On 7/5/2016 4:36 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> > On 7/4/2016 8:45 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >> On 7/4/2016 3:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Won't the user provided files also get made available by the config
>> >>> drive /
>> >>> metadata service ? I think that's the primary reason for file
>> >>> injection not
>> >>> being a fatal problem. Oh that and the fact that we've wanted to kill
>> >>> it for
>> >>> at least 3 years now :-)
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Daniel
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Ugh, good point, except force_config_drive defaults to False and
>> running
>> >> the metadata service is optional.
>> >>
>> >> In the case of this failing in the tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ssh job,
>> >> the instance is not created with a config drive, but the metadata
>> >> service is running. Tempest doesn't check for the files there though
>> >> because it's configured to expect file injection to work, so it ssh's
>> >> into the guest and looks for the files.
>> >>
>> >> I have several changes up related to this:
>> >>
>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1598581
>> >>
>> >> One is making Tempest disable file injection tests by default since
>> Nova
>> >> disables file injection by default (at least for the libvirt driver).
>> >>
>> >> Another is changing devstack to actually configure nova/tempest for
>> file
>> >> injection which is what the job should have been doing anyway.
>> >>
>> >> My nova fix is not going to fly because of config drive (which I could
>> >> check from the virt driver) and the metadata service (which I can't
>> from
>> >> the virt driver). So I guess the best we can do is log something...
>> >>
>> >
>> > I think I can still fail the server create from the libvirt driver if we
>> > can't honor the request.
>> >
>> > For config drive, I can just check configdrive.required_by(instance)
>> > like we normally do.
>> >
>> > For the metadata API, it's a bit uglier, but I could check if 'metadata'
>> > is in CONF.enabled_apis and if not, and no config drive and files were
>> > requested for injection but it's disabled, then we fail.
>>
>> mtreinish pointed out that this would rely on having enabled_apis
>> configured in nova.conf on the nova-compute nodes, which might not be
>> the case, and I'm not sure we have a way to tell with oslo.config if an
>> option is not present vs getting the default value when not specified.
>> So I probably can't rely on that.
>>
>> >
>> > How terrible is that?
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt Riedemann
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 10
>> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:55:20 +0900
>> From: Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu.kj at gmail.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 9
>> Message-ID:
>> <
>> CAFdRU70bbDfmGxh5Tvbd5tRyripCjQ-Ty4pqtrwVEAdjzYY5yg at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Thank you for your clarification.
>>
>> Would you file a bug on this when you get a chance?
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tricircle/
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Luck Dog <dfhuangg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > The problem has been solved now. I add a new line to
>> >
>> > the file local.conf. The content of the added line is
>> >
>> > ?NEUTRON_CREATE_INITIAL_NETWORKS=False?, By adding this line
>> >
>> > Devstack won?t create default network, and it will use the configuration
>> >
>> > set manually. Without this line, Devstack will create initial network
>> >
>> > elements including external network. However, This external network
>> >
>> > is not supported by single node. If it runs on a single node then
>> >
>> > some errors will turn up. It is exactly the error I met.
>> >
>> >
>> > @ Shinobu, The attachment is the old local.conf. it is from the
>> official
>> >
>> > net page, and the URL is
>> >
>> https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/blob/master/devstack/local.conf.sample
>> >
>> > thanks for your kindness!
>> >
>> > 2016-07-05 14:58 GMT+08:00 <openstack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>:
>> >
>> >> Send OpenStack-dev mailing list submissions to
>> >> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >>
>> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> >> openstack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org
>> >>
>> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> >> openstack-dev-owner at lists.openstack.org
>> >>
>> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> >> than "Re: Contents of OpenStack-dev digest..."
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Today's Topics:
>> >>
>> >> 1. Re: [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split (Vikas Choudhary)
>> >> 2. Re: [mistral] [murano] [yaql] yaqluator bug (Renat Akhmerov)
>> >> 3. Re: [mistral] [murano] [yaql] yaqluator bug (Stan Lagun)
>> >> 4. Re: [nova] Non-priority feature freeze and FFEs (Claudiu Belu)
>> >> 5. Re: OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 6 (Shinobu Kinjo)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 1
>> >> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:11:04 +0530
>> >> From: Vikas Choudhary <choudharyvikas16 at gmail.com>
>> >> To: Antoni Segura Puimedon <toni+openstackml at midokura.com>
>> >> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
>> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, Irena Berezovsky
>> >> <irena at midokura.com>
>> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split
>> >> Message-ID:
>> >> <
>> >> CABJxuZrVDTaTHHBxs4RNuLq30n04KBbhuk7gKEdWXDCC8ggvxA at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >>
>> >> Hello Everybody !!!
>> >>
>> >> As we discussed in the meeting yesterday, I have submitted restructured
>> >> patches now in kuryr-lib and kuryr-libnetwork to address only dropping
>> >> non-relevant code and adding kuryr-lib as dependency to
>> kuryr-libnetwork.
>> >>
>> >> Please provide review comments so that i quickly reiterate over patches
>> >> and
>> >> eventually we will be able to move our existing under review patches
>> also
>> >> from kuryr to kuryr-libnetwork.
>> >>
>> >> Since RPC support is also ready, will be submitting the same in both
>> repos
>> >> as seperate patches(linked with dependency)
>> >>
>> >> Here is the link for base patchsets:
>> >> Kuryr-libnetwork: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337350/
>> >> kuryr-lib: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336784/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Vikas
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <
>> >> toni+openstackml at midokura.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi fellow kuryrs!
>> >> >
>> >> > In order to proceed with the split of kuryr into a main lib and it's
>> >> kuryr
>> >> > libnetwork component, we've cloned the contents of openstack/kuryr
>> over
>> >> to
>> >> > openstack/kuryr-libnetwork.
>> >> >
>> >> > The idea is that after this, the patches that will go to
>> openstack/kuryr
>> >> > will be to trim out the kuryr/kuryr-libnetwork specific parts and
>> make a
>> >> > release of the common parts so that openstack/kuryr-libnetwork can
>> start
>> >> > using it.
>> >> >
>> >> > I propose that we use python namespaces and the current common code
>> in
>> >> > kuryr is moved to:
>> >> > kuryr/lib/
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > which openstack/kuryr-libnetwork would import like so:
>> >> >
>> >> > from kuryr.lib import binding
>> >> >
>> >> > So, right now, patches in review that are for the Docker ipam or
>> remote
>> >> > driver, should be moved to openstack/kuryr-libnetwork and soon we
>> should
>> >> > make openstack/kuryr-libnetwork add kuryr-lib to the requirements.
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> >
>> >> > Toni
>> >> >
>> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> URL: <
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160705/0d032a4c/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 2
>> >> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:07:25 +0700
>> >> From: Renat Akhmerov <renat.akhmerov at gmail.com>
>> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [murano] [yaql] yaqluator bug
>> >> Message-ID: <E9ADF691-7387-47EB-86F5-2A3EEFCF3291 at gmail.com>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >>
>> >> If I understand the meaning of ?join? function correctly then from user
>> >> perspective this behavior in Mistral and Yaqluator is a bug because
>> we?re
>> >> joining two collections similar to how it works in SQL so the correct
>> >> result should be:
>> >>
>> >> [[1, 3], [2, 3]]
>> >>
>> >> I.e. collection consisting of two collections where each element if the
>> >> first one is combined with each element of the second one.
>> >>
>> >> If so, we need to fix this in both Mistral and Yaqluator.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Alex, Stan, do you agree?
>> >>
>> >> Renat Akhmerov
>> >> @Nokia
>> >>
>> >> > On 28 Jun 2016, at 23:46, Elisha, Moshe (Nokia - IL) <
>> >> moshe.elisha at nokia.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you for the kind words, Alexey.
>> >> >
>> >> > I was able to reproduce your bug and I have also found the issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > The problem is that we did not create the parser with the
>> >> engine_options used in the yaql library by default when using the CLI.
>> >> > Specifically, the "yaql.limitIterators" was missing? I am not sure
>> that
>> >> this settings should have this affect but maybe the Yaql guys can
>> comment
>> >> on that.
>> >> >
>> >> > If we will change yaqluator to use this setting it will mean that
>> >> yaqluator will not be consistent with Mistral because Mistral is using
>> YAQL
>> >> without this engine option (If I use your example in a workflow,
>> Mistral
>> >> returns exactly like the yaqluator returns)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Workflow:
>> >> >
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >> version: '2.0'
>> >> >>
>> >> >> test_yaql:
>> >> >> tasks:
>> >> >> test_yaql:
>> >> >> action: std.noop
>> >> >> publish:
>> >> >> output_expr: <% [1,2].join([3], true, [$1, $2]) %>
>> >> >
>> >> > Workflow result:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > [root at s53-19 ~(keystone_admin)]# mistral task-get-published
>> >> 01d2bce3-20d0-47b2-84f2-7bd1cb2bf9f7
>> >> > {
>> >> > "output_expr": [
>> >> > [
>> >> > 1,
>> >> > 3
>> >> > ]
>> >> > ]
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > As Matthews pointed out, the yaqluator is indeed OpenSource and
>> >> contributions are welcomed.
>> >> >
>> >> > [1]
>> >>
>> https://github.com/ALU-CloudBand/yaqluator/commit/e523dacdde716d200b5ed1015543d4c4680c98c2
>> >> <
>> >>
>> https://github.com/ALU-CloudBand/yaqluator/commit/e523dacdde716d200b5ed1015543d4c4680c98c2
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > From: Dougal Matthews <dougal at redhat.com <mailto:dougal at redhat.com>>
>> >> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> >> questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org <mailto:
>> >> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
>> >> > Date: Monday, 27 June 2016 at 16:44
>> >> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>> >> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org <mailto:
>> >> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
>> >> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [murano] [yaql] yaqluator bug
>> >> >
>> >> > On 27 June 2016 at 14:30, Alexey Khivin <akhivin at gmail.com <mailto:
>> >> akhivin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> >> Hello, Moshe
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Tomorrow I discovered yaqluator.com <http://yaqluator.com/> for
>> >> myself! Thanks for the useful tool!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But suddenly I was said that the expression
>> >> >> [1,2].join([3], true, [$1, $2])
>> >> >> evaluated to [[1,3]] on the yaqluator
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A the same time this expression evaluated right when I using raw
>> yaql
>> >> interpreter.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Could we fix this issue?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> By the way, don't you want to make yaqluator opensource? If you
>> would
>> >> transfer yaqluator to Openstack Foundation, then community will be
>> able to
>> >> fix such kind of bugs
>> >> >
>> >> > It looks like it is open source, there is a link in the footer:
>> >> https://github.com/ALU-CloudBand/yaqluator <
>> >> https://github.com/ALU-CloudBand/yaqluator>
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thank you!
>> >> >> Best regards, Alexey Khivin
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <
>> >> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >>
>> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> URL: <
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160705/4977ab22/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 3
>> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 22:12:55 -0700
>> >> From: Stan Lagun <slagun at mirantis.com>
>> >> To: "Elisha, Moshe (Nokia - IL)" <moshe.elisha at nokia.com>
>> >> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
>> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [murano] [yaql] yaqluator bug
>> >> Message-ID:
>> >> <CAOCoZia=zLQqn54mwjk2me0H2KXfeqa-J6=
>> >> x3iAKz+sxO+k3Pg at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >>
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> The issue with join is just a yaql bug that is already fixed. The
>> problem
>> >> with yaqluator is that it doesn't use the latest yaql library.
>> >>
>> >> Another problem is that it does't sets options correctly. As a result
>> it
>> >> is
>> >> possible to bring the site down with a query that produces endless
>> >> collection
>> >>
>> >> Sincerely yours,
>> >> Stan Lagun
>> >> Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis
>> >>
>> >> <slagun at mirantis.com>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Elisha, Moshe (Nokia - IL) <
>> >> moshe.elisha at nokia.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you for the kind words, Alexey.
>> >> >
>> >> > I was able to reproduce your bug and I have also found the issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > The problem is that we did not create the parser with the
>> engine_options
>> >> > used in the yaql library by default when using the CLI.
>> >> > Specifically, the "yaql.limitIterators" was missing? I am not sure
>> that
>> >> > this settings should have this affect but maybe the Yaql guys can
>> >> comment
>> >> > on that.
>> >> >
>> >> > If we will change yaqluator to use this setting it will mean that
>> >> > yaqluator will not be consistent with Mistral because Mistral is
>> using
>> >> YAQL
>> >> > without this engine option (If I use your example in a workflow,
>> Mistral
>> >> > returns exactly like the yaqluator returns)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Workflow:
>> >> >
>> >> > ---
>> >> > version: '2.0'
>> >> >
>> >> > test_yaql:
>> >> > tasks:
>> >> > test_yaql:
>> >> > action: std.noop
>> >> > publish:
>> >> > output_expr: <% [1,2].join([3], true, [$1, $2]) %>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Workflow result:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > [root at s53-19 ~(keystone_admin)]# mistral task-get-published
>> >> > 01d2bce3-20d0-47b2-84f2-7bd1cb2bf9f7
>> >> > {
>> >> > "output_expr": [
>> >> > [
>> >> > 1,
>> >> > 3
>> >> > ]
>> >> > ]
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > As Matthews pointed out, the yaqluator is indeed OpenSource and
>> >> > contributions are welcomed.
>> >> >
>> >> > [1]
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://github.com/ALU-CloudBand/yaqluator/commit/e523dacdde716d200b5ed1015543d4c4680c98c2
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > From: Dougal Matthews <dougal at redhat.com>
>> >> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> >> questions)" <
>> >> > openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> > Date: Monday, 27 June 2016 at 16:44
>> >> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>> >> > openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [murano] [yaql] yaqluator bug
>> >> >
>> >> > On 27 June 2016 at 14:30, Alexey Khivin <akhivin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hello, Moshe
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Tomorrow I discovered yaqluator.com for myself! Thanks for the
>> useful
>> >> >> tool!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But suddenly I was said that the expression
>> >> >> [1,2].join([3], true, [$1, $2])
>> >> >> evaluated to [[1,3]] on the yaqluator
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A the same time this expression evaluated right when I using raw
>> yaql
>> >> >> interpreter.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Could we fix this issue?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> By the way, don't you want to make yaqluator opensource? If you
>> would
>> >> >> transfer yaqluator to Openstack Foundation, then community will be
>> >> able to
>> >> >> fix such kind of bugs
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > It looks like it is open source, there is a link in the footer:
>> >> > https://github.com/ALU-CloudBand/yaqluator
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thank you!
>> >> >> Best regards, Alexey Khivin
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> URL: <
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/fe707c06/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 4
>> >> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 06:26:38 +0000
>> >> From: Claudiu Belu <cbelu at cloudbasesolutions.com>
>> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Non-priority feature freeze and
>> >> FFEs
>> >> Message-ID:
>> >>
>> <FBEE3301F14DA946B921457EF854C37742E82761 at CBSEX1.cloudbase.local>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> The Hyper-V implementation of the bp virt-device-role-tagging is
>> >> mergeable [1]. The patch is quite simple, it got some reviews, and the
>> >> tempest test test_device_tagging [2] passed. [3]
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331889/
>> >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305120/
>> >> [3]
>> >>
>> http://64.119.130.115/debug/nova/331889/8/04-07-2016_19-43/results.html.gz
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >>
>> >> Claudiu Belu
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________________
>> >> From: Markus Zoeller [mzoeller at linux.vnet.ibm.com]
>> >> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 2:24 PM
>> >> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Non-priority feature freeze and
>> FFEs
>> >>
>> >> On 01.07.2016 23:03, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >> > We're now past non-priority feature freeze. I've started going
>> through
>> >> > some blueprints and -2ing them if they still have outstanding
>> changes. I
>> >> > haven't gone through the full list yet (we started with 100).
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm also building a list of potential FFE candidates based on:
>> >> >
>> >> > 1. How far along the change is (how ready is it?), e.g. does it
>> require
>> >> > a lot of change yet? Does it require a Tempest test and is that
>> passing
>> >> > already? How much of the series has already merged and what's left?
>> >> >
>> >> > 2. How much core reviewer attention has it already gotten?
>> >> >
>> >> > 3. What kind of priority does it have, i.e. if we don't get it done
>> in
>> >> > Newton do we miss something in Ocata? Think things that start
>> >> > deprecation/removal timers.
>> >> >
>> >> > The plan is for the nova core team to have an informal meeting in the
>> >> > #openstack-nova IRC channel early next week, either Tuesday or
>> >> > Wednesday, and go through the list of potential FFE candidates.
>> >> >
>> >> > Blueprints that get exceptions will be checked against the above
>> >> > criteria and who on the core team is actually going to push the
>> changes
>> >> > through.
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm looking to get any exceptions completed within a week, so
>> targeting
>> >> > Wednesday 7/13. That leaves a few days for preparing for the meetup.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> FWIW, bp "libvirt-virtlogd" [1] is basically ready to merge. The two
>> >> changes [2] and [3] did already get a lot of attention from danpb.
>> >>
>> >> References:
>> >> [1]
>> >>
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=libvirt-virtlogd
>> >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334480/
>> >> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323765/
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 5
>> >> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:58:24 +0900
>> >> From: Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu.kj at gmail.com>
>> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 6
>> >> Message-ID:
>> >> <CAFdRU713mdpLDwbdD=xaRMkOPO=
>> >> UVFF0YQY9x_Ef2dqZmXEp6A at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >>
>> >> Would you attach local.conf you're using?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Luck Dog <dfhuangg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hello everyone,
>> >> > I am running the devstack with patch Tricircle,according to
>> steps
>> >> > given by official net page,
>> >> > https://github.com/openstack/tricircle#play-with-devstack.But it
>> >> always
>> >> > failed at the same place.The errors are listed as
>> follows.(according
>> >> to
>> >> > the stack.sh.logs)
>> >> >
>> >> > Request body: {u'network': {u'router:external': True,
>> >> > u'provider:network_type': u'flat', u'name': u'public',
>> >> > u'provider:physical_network': u'public', u'admin_state_up':
>> True}}^[[00m
>> >> > ^[[00;33mfrom (pid=29980) prepare_request_body
>> >> > /opt/stack/neutron/neutron/api/v2/base.py:674^[[00m
>> >> > 2016-06-29 17:56:04.359 ^[[00;32mDEBUG neutron.db.quota.driver
>> >> > [^[[01;36mreq-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453 ^[[00;36madmin
>> >> > 13869ba8005b480bbcbe17b2695fd5e2^[[00;32m]
>> ^[[01;35m^[[00;32mResources
>> >> > subnetpool have unlimited quota limit. It is not required to
>> calculate
>> >> > headroom ^[[00m ^[[00;33mfrom (pid=29980) make_reservation
>> >> > /opt/stack/neutron/neutron/db/quota/driver.py:191^[[00m
>> >> > 2016-06-29 17:56:04.381 ^[[00;32mDEBUG neutron.db.quota.driver
>> >> > [^[[01;36mreq-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453 ^[[00;36madmin
>> >> > 13869ba8005b480bbcbe17b2695fd5e2^[[00;32m]
>> ^[[01;35m^[[00;32mAttempting
>> >> to
>> >> > reserve 1 items for resource network. Total usage: 0; quota limit:
>> 10;
>> >> > headroom:10^[[00m ^[[00;33mfrom (pid=29980) make_reservation
>> >> > /opt/stack/neutron/neutron/db/quota/driver.py:223^[[00m
>> >> > 2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 ^[[01;31mERROR neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > [^[[01;36mreq-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453 ^[[00;36madmin
>> >> > 13869ba8005b480bbcbe17b2695fd5e2^[[01;31m] ^[[01;35m^[[01;31mcreate
>> >> > failed^[[00m
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00mTraceback (most recent call last):
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> "/opt/stack/neutron/neutron/api/v2/resource.py",
>> >> > line
>> >> > 78, in resource
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m result = method(request=request, **args)
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m File "/opt/stack/neutron/neutron/api/v2/base.py",
>> line
>> >> > 424, in create
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m return self._create(request, body, **kwargs)
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_db/api.py", line 148, in
>> >> > wrapper
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m ectxt.value = e.inner_exc
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line
>> >> 221,
>> >> > in __exit__
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m self.force_reraise()
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line
>> >> 197,
>> >> > in force_reraise
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m six.reraise(self.type_, self.value, self.tb)
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_db/api.py", line 138, in
>> >> > wrapper
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m return f(*args, **kwargs)
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m File "/opt/stack/neutron/neutron/api/v2/base.py",
>> line
>> >> > 535, in _create
>> >> > [[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m return obj_creator(request.context, **kwargs)
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> "/opt/stack/tricircle/tricircle/network/plugin.py",
>> >> > line 238, in create_network
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m is_external =
>> >> > self._ensure_az_set_for_external_network(net_data)
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> "/opt/stack/tricircle/tricircle/network/plugin.py",
>> >> > line 184, in _ensure_az_set_for_external_network
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m raise t_exceptions.ExternalNetPodNotSpecify()
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00mExternalNetPodNotSpecify: Pod for external network not
>> >> > specified
>> >> > ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> > ^[[01;35m^[[00m
>> >> > 2016-06-29 17:56:04.439 ^[[00;36mINFO neutron.wsgi
>> >> > [^[[01;36mreq-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453 ^[[00;36madmin
>> >> > 13869ba8005b480bbcbe17b2695fd5e2^[[00;36m]
>> ^[[01;35m^[[00;36m127.0.0.1
>> >> - -
>> >> > [29/Jun/2016 17:56:04] "POST /v2.0/networks.json HTTP/1.1" 500 368
>> >> > 0.147805^[[00m
>> >> >
>> >> > Part of the final printed errors on terminal are:
>> >> >
>> >> > Request Failed: internal server error while processing your request.
>> >> > Neutron server returns request_ids:
>> >> > ['req-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453']
>> >> > lib/neutron_plugins/services/l3:create_neutron_initial_network:203
>> >> > lib/neutron_plugins/services/l3:create_neutron_initial_network:207
>> >> > [ERROR] /home/sword/DevStack/functions-common:207 Failure creating
>> >> > EXT_NET_ID for public
>> >> >
>> >> > I run it several times but still failed. I was in China main land
>> but
>> >> I
>> >> > bought a VPN. So it may not be due to the
>> >> > network. @Fawaz Mohammed,Also, I conducted your suggestions and
>> failed
>> >> at
>> >> > last.
>> >> >
>> >> > I wish someone could help me with this question.thanks!
>> >> >
>> >> > Best,
>> >> > Dongfeng
>> >> >
>> >> > 2016-07-04 17:36 GMT+08:00 <
>> openstack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Send OpenStack-dev mailing list submissions to
>> >> >> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> >> >>
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> >> >> openstack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> >> >> openstack-dev-owner at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> >> >> than "Re: Contents of OpenStack-dev digest..."
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Today's Topics:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1. Re: [Nova] Questions about instance actions' update and
>> >> >> finish (Matt Riedemann)
>> >> >> 2. Re: [manila][stable] liberty periodic bitrot jobs have been
>> >> >> failing more than a week (Matt Riedemann)
>> >> >> 3. Re: Syntribos Error : AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no
>> >> >> attribute 'headers' (David Stanek)
>> >> >> 4. Re: [tricircle] Error when running Devstack (Fawaz Mohammed)
>> >> >> 5. Re: Openstack Mitaka Neutron LBaaS Question (Fawaz Mohammed)
>> >> >> 6. [nova] Fail build request if we can't inject files?
>> >> >> (Matt Riedemann)
>> >> >> 7. Re: Syntribos Error : AttributeError: 'tuple' object has
>> no
>> >> >> attribute 'headers' (OpenStack Mailing List Archive)
>> >> >> 8. Re: [manila][stable] liberty periodic bitrot jobs have been
>> >> >> failing more than a week (Valeriy Ponomaryov)
>> >> >> 9. Re: New Python35 Jobs coming (Henry Gessau)
>> >> >> 10. [kolla][horizon] Out of branch horizon plugins? (Dave Walker)
>> >> >> 11. Re: New Python35 Jobs coming (Clint Byrum)
>> >> >> 12. [Kolla] [docker] Storage-driver and loopback usage? (Gerard
>> >> Braad)
>> >> >> 13. Re: [grenade] upgrades vs rootwrap (Angus Lees)
>> >> >> 14. [keystone] spec freeze on july 8th, 2016 (Steve Martinelli)
>> >> >> 15. Re: [Kolla] [docker] Storage-driver and loopback usage?
>> >> >> (Jeffrey Zhang)
>> >> >> 16. Re: [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"
>> >> >> (Joshua Hesketh)
>> >> >> 17. Re: New Python35 Jobs coming (Andreas Jaeger)
>> >> >> 18. Re: New Python35 Jobs coming (Denis Makogon)
>> >> >> 19. Re: [Nova] Questions about instance actions' update and
>> >> >> finish (Zhenyu Zheng)
>> >> >> 20. Re: [mistral][osc-lib][openstackclient] is it too early for
>> >> >> orc-lib? (Renat Akhmerov)
>> >> >> 21. Re: [nova][infra][ci] bulk repeating a test job on a single
>> >> >> review in parallel ? (Kashyap Chamarthy)
>> >> >> 22. [tricircle] (Luck Dog)
>> >> >> 23. Re: New Python35 Jobs coming (Victor Stinner)
>> >> >> 24. Re: Openstack Mitaka Neutron LBaaS Question (Elena Ezhova)
>> >> >> 25. Re: [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split (Antoni Segura Puimedon)
>> >> >> 26. Re: [neutron][upgrades] Bi-weekly upgrades work status.
>> >> >> 6/20/2016 (Damon Wang)
>> >> >> 27. Re: [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost
>> >> >> integration (Stephen Hindle)
>> >> >> 28. Re: [daisycloud-core] [kolla] Kolla Mitaka
>> >> >> requirementssupported by CentOS (hu.zhijiang at zte.com.cn)
>> >> >> 29. Re: [daisycloud-core] [kolla] Kolla Mitaka
>> >> >> requirementssupported by CentOS (Gerard Braad)
>> >> >> 30. ??: [probably forge email???????]Re: [daisycloud-core] Kolla
>> >> >> Mitaka requirementssupported by CentOS (
>> hu.zhijiang at zte.com.cn)
>> >> >> 31. Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Fail build request if we
>> >> >> can't inject files? (Daniel P. Berrange)
>> >> >> 32. Re: [all][Python 3.4-3.5] Async python clients (Julien Danjou)
>> >> >> 33. Re: [Fuel] - Nominate Maksim Malchuk to Fuel Library Core
>> >> >> (Sergii Golovatiuk)
>> >> >> 34. Re: [all][Python 3.4-3.5] Async python clients (Denis Makogon)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 1
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 08:05:06 -0500
>> >> >> From: Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Questions about instance
>> actions'
>> >> >> update and finish
>> >> >> Message-ID: <
>> d53105c4-4184-a737-a27c-f8b981cabb8b at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 7/3/2016 6:21 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2016-07-02 2:32 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague <sean at dague.net
>> >> >> > <mailto:sean at dague.net>>:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 06/30/2016 08:31 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >> >> > >> On 6/29/2016 10:10 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >> >> > >>> On 6/29/2016 6:40 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>> >> >> > >>>>
>> >> >> > >>>>
>> >> >> > >>>>
>> >> >> > >>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016, at 09:27 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote:
>> >> >> > >>>>> How about I sync updated_at and created_at in my patch,
>> and
>> >> >> leave the
>> >> >> > >>>>> finish to the other BP, by this way, I can use
>> updated_at
>> >> for
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > >>>>> timestamp filter I added and it don't need to change
>> again
>> >> >> once the
>> >> >> > >>>>> finish BP is complete.
>> >> >> > >>>>
>> >> >> > >>>> Sounds good to me.
>> >> >> > >>>>
>> >> >> > >>>
>> >> >> > >>> It's been a long day so my memory might be fried, but the
>> >> >> options we
>> >> >> > >>> talked about in the API meeting were:
>> >> >> > >>>
>> >> >> > >>> 1. Setting updated_at = created_at when the instance
>> action
>> >> >> record is
>> >> >> > >>> created. Laski likes this, I'm not crazy about it,
>> especially
>> >> >> since we
>> >> >> > >>> don't do that for anything else.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > I would actually like for us to do this generally. I have
>> the
>> >> same
>> >> >> > > thinking as Ed does elsewhere in this thread, the creation
>> of a
>> >> >> record
>> >> >> > > is an update of that record. So take my comments as
>> applying to
>> >> >> Nova
>> >> >> > > overall and not just this issue.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Agree. Also it just simplifies a number of things. We should
>> just
>> >> >> start
>> >> >> > doing this going forward, and probably put some online data
>> >> >> migrations
>> >> >> > in place next cycle to update all the old records. Once
>> >> updated_at
>> >> >> can't
>> >> >> > be null, we can handle things like this a bit better.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The marker should be a column with UniqueConstraint, the
>> updated_at
>> >> is
>> >> >> > not. But if we say the accuracy is ok, there will have problem
>> with
>> >> >> > updated_at as None.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yeah I thought about this later, we don't use a timestamp field as a
>> >> >> marker for anything else, and as noted it's not a non-nullable
>> unique
>> >> >> field, plus it's mutable which worries me for a marker field
>> >> (created_at
>> >> >> wouldn't change, but updated_at could).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Anyway, we already freeze... probably we can begin to fix the
>> >> updated_at
>> >> >> > problem first.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > >>> 2. Update the instance action's updated_at when instance
>> >> action
>> >> >> events
>> >> >> > >>> are created. I like this since the instance action is
>> like a
>> >> >> parent
>> >> >> > >>> resource and the event is the child, so when we
>> create/modify
>> >> >> an event
>> >> >> > >>> we can consider it an update to the parent. Laski thought
>> >> this
>> >> >> might be
>> >> >> > >>> weird UX given we don't expose instance action events in
>> the
>> >> >> REST API
>> >> >> > >>> unless you're an admin. This is also probably not
>> something
>> >> >> we'd do for
>> >> >> > >>> other related resources like server groups and server
>> group
>> >> >> members (but
>> >> >> > >>> we don't page on those either right now).
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Right. My concern is just that the ordering of actions can
>> >> change
>> >> >> based
>> >> >> > > on events happening which are not visible to the user.
>> However
>> >> >> thinking
>> >> >> > > about it further we don't really allow multiple actions at
>> >> once,
>> >> >> except
>> >> >> > > for a few special cases like delete, so this may not end up
>> >> >> affecting
>> >> >> > > any ordering as actions are mostly serial. I think this is a
>> >> fine
>> >> >> > > solution for the issue at hand. I just think #1 is a more
>> >> general
>> >> >> > > solution.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >>>
>> >> >> > >>> 3. Order the results by updated_at,created_at so that if
>> >> >> updated_at
>> >> >> > >>> isn't set for older records, created_at will be used. I
>> think
>> >> >> we all
>> >> >> > >>> agreed in the meeting to do this regardless of #1 or #2
>> >> above.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I kind of hate that as the order, because then the marker is
>> >> going
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> > have to be really funny double timestamp, right?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The marker only needs to fill with the unique value. There isn't
>> any
>> >> >> > problem order with multiple column. Some time we need order with
>> >> >> > mulitple column for stable order when the first order column is
>> >> >> > without UniqueConstraint.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I guess that's the one thing I don't see in this patch is a
>> >> >> functional
>> >> >> > test that actually loads up instance actions and iterates
>> through
>> >> >> > demonstrating the pagination.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -Sean
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Sean Dague
>> >> >> > http://dague.net
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > <
>> >> >>
>> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>> >> >> >
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Matt Riedemann
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 2
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 08:19:55 -0500
>> >> >> From: Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [manila][stable] liberty periodic
>> bitrot
>> >> >> jobs have been failing more than a week
>> >> >> Message-ID: <
>> 37858941-062c-8fd7-9794-9f4d9588a446 at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 7/1/2016 8:18 PM, Ravi, Goutham wrote:
>> >> >> > Thanks Matt.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334220 adds the upper
>> constraints.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Goutham
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 7/1/16, 5:08 PM, "Matt Riedemann" <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The manila periodic stable/liberty jobs have been failing for at
>> >> least a
>> >> >> > week.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > It looks like manila isn't using upper-constraints when running
>> unit
>> >> >> > tests, not even on stable/mitaka or master. So in liberty it's
>> >> pulling
>> >> >> > in uncapped oslo.utils even though the upper constraint for
>> >> oslo.utils
>> >> >> > in liberty is 3.2.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Who from the manila team is going to be working on fixing this,
>> >> either
>> >> >> > via getting upper-constraints in place in the tox.ini for manila
>> (on
>> >> all
>> >> >> > supported branches) or performing some kind of workaround in the
>> >> code?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I noticed that there is no Tempest / devstack job run against the
>> >> >> stable/liberty change - why is there no integration testing of
>> Manila
>> >> in
>> >> >> stable/liberty outside of 3rd party CI (which is not voting)?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Matt Riedemann
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 3
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 09:23:07 -0400
>> >> >> From: David Stanek <dstanek at dstanek.com>
>> >> >> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Syntribos Error : AttributeError:
>> 'tuple'
>> >> >> object has no attribute 'headers'
>> >> >> Message-ID: <20160703132307.GA45453 at mba>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 07/02 at 15:52, OpenStack Mailing List Archive wrote:
>> >> >> > Link: https://openstack.nimeyo.com/89478/?show=89478#q89478
>> >> >> > From: run2obtain <run2obtain at gmail.com>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi... I tried to use OpenStack Syntribos today for security
>> testing
>> >> >> against my
>> >> >> > devstack kilo cloud. I followed installation and configuration
>> >> >> instructions
>> >> >> > provided at the openstack syntribos repo .Unfortunately, I
>> received
>> >> >> some errors
>> >> >> > after running the command : syntribos keystone.config
>> >> >> .opencafe/templates/
>> >> >> > keystone/roles_get.txt . The errors are File
>> >> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/
>> >> >> > dist-packages/syntribos/extensions/identity/client.py", line 146,
>> in
>> >> >> > get_token_v3 return r.headers["X-Subject-Token"] AttributeError:
>> >> >> 'tuple' object
>> >> >> > has no attribute 'headers'. ' I have not been successful at
>> >> discovering
>> >> >> what
>> >> >> > could be wrong or how to resolve this issue, even after googling.
>> >> Does
>> >> >> anyone
>> >> >> > have a hint as to how to resolve this issue. Many thanks for your
>> >> >> anticipated
>> >> >> > response.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A quick look at the code[1] show that the HTTP client used by the
>> >> identity
>> >> >> client actually returns a tuple instead of a response object. The
>> tuple
>> >> >> contains two items: a response object and a signal handler object.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This is the first I've heard of this project, so I was very
>> >> disappointed
>> >> >> to not find any docs for it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1.
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/openstack/syntribos/blob/master/syntribos/clients/http/base_http_client.py#L143
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> David Stanek
>> >> >> web: http://dstanek.com
>> >> >> blog: http://traceback.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 4
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 17:59:25 +0400
>> >> >> From: Fawaz Mohammed <fawaz.moh.ibraheem at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Error when running Devstack
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <
>> >> >> CA+NahOWJZ_mrZz7G7X-M0Nfwxvwf0G0yLS5+LEsyTMvNsh3g-A at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Dongfeng,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've noted in the title [Tricircle], but in your body mail, nothing
>> >> >> related
>> >> >> to Tricircle!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's not recommended to use the sample configuration file as it's,
>> make
>> >> >> sure that you edit it as per your preferred configuration.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Also, note that it's good to run stack.sh as stack user, you can
>> create
>> >> >> stack user by running:
>> >> >> $sudo /devstack/tools/create-stack-user.sh
>> >> >> Then, move the devstack folder to stack home user, or clone it
>> again:
>> >> >> stack at Host$cd ~
>> >> >> stack at host$git clone
>> https://git.openstack.org/openstack-dev/devstack
>> >> >> Edit your local.conf configuration file, then run stack.sh script.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Luck Dog <dfhuangg at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hello everyone,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I am trying to run DevStack on Ubuntu 14.04 in a single
>> VirtualBox.
>> >> An
>> >> >> > error turns up before it successfully starts. My steps are:
>> >> >> > 1), Git clone DevStack,
>> >> >> > 2), Copy devstack/local.conf.sample to DevStack folder and rename
>> it
>> >> to
>> >> >> > local.conf.
>> >> >> > The errors are as follows?
>> >> >> > Request Failed: internal server error while processing your
>> request.
>> >> >> > Neutron server returns request_ids:
>> >> >> > ['req-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453']
>> >> >> > lib/neutron_plugins/services/l3:create_neutron_initial_network:203
>> >> >> > lib/neutron_plugins/services/l3:create_neutron_initial_network:207
>> >> >> > [ERROR] /home/sword/DevStack/functions-common:207 Failure creating
>> >> >> > EXT_NET_ID for public
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I don't know whether it is my wrong configuration of computer or
>> the
>> >> >> > server error, I wish someone can help me with the problem. thanks!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Best regards,
>> >> >> > Dongfeng
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160703/8584112c/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 5
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:10:02 +0400
>> >> >> From: Fawaz Mohammed <fawaz.moh.ibraheem at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Cc: "openstack at lists.openstack.org" <openstack at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack Mitaka Neutron LBaaS Question
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CA+NahOUMgiNoKAnzrZKrOgo=Eigrpv8VHaSZzPxwC=
>> >> >> WLtQCnEQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Wally,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Make sure that neutron-server is running. Check neutron-server, and
>> >> >> neutron-l3-agent logs.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >> Fawaz Mohammed
>> >> >> .
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 2:24 AM, zhihao wang <
>> wangzhihaocom at hotmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Dear OpenStack Dev member:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > May I ask you some question about neutron lbaaS?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > How to install the neutron LBaaS with Octavia in Mitaka?
>> >> >> > I followed these two guide ,but which one I should use? (My
>> >> openstack is
>> >> >> > Mitaka , 1 controller, 2 compute nodes)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/HowToRun --
>> Ubuntu
>> >> >> > Packages Setup
>> >> >> >
>> >>
>> http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/adv-config-lbaas.html
>> >> >> > -- Configuring LBaaS v2 with Octavia
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Here is what I did:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > pip install octavia
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > and then :
>> >> >> > vim /etc/neutron/neutron.conf
>> >> >> > service_plugins =
>> >> >> >
>> >> router,neutron_lbaas.services.loadbalancer.plugin.LoadBalancerPluginv2
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > [service_providers]
>> >> >> > service_provider =
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> LOADBALANCERV2:Octavia:neutron_lbaas.drivers.octavia.driver.OctaviaDriver:default
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /etc/openstack-dashboard/local_settings.py
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > OPENSTACK_NEUTRON_NETWORK = {
>> >> >> > 'enable_lb': True
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And then I restart all the neutron service and apache server
>> >> >> > service neutron-server restart
>> >> >> > service neutron-dhcp-agent restart
>> >> >> > service neutron-metadata-agent restart
>> >> >> > service neutron-l3-agent restart
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > but and then i ran the command neutron agent-list, it return
>> this. I
>> >> am
>> >> >> > wondering what is wrong with this? how can I install Neutron LaaS?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > root at controller:~# neutron agent-list
>> >> >> > Unable to establish connection to
>> >> >> http://controller:9696/v2.0/agents.json
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Please help
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks so much
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks
>> >> >> > Wally
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160703/c3bd39ba/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 6
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 10:08:04 -0500
>> >> >> From: Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
>> >> >> "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org"
>> >> >> <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Fail build request if we can't
>> inject
>> >> >> files?
>> >> >> Message-ID: <
>> 3e959d6e-09b3-4047-ff31-c44efab981f3 at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I want to use the gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ssh in nova since
>> it
>> >> >> runs ssh validation + neutron + config drive + metadata service,
>> which
>> >> >> will test the virtual device tagging 2.32 microversion API (added
>> last
>> >> >> week).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The job has a file injection test that fails consistently which is
>> >> >> keeping it from being voting.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> After debugging, the problem is the files to inject are silently
>> >> ignored
>> >> >> because n-cpu is configured with libvirt.inject_partition=-2 by
>> >> default.
>> >> >> That disables file injection:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/faf50a747e03873c3741dac89263a80112da915a/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L3030
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We don't even log a warning if the user requested files to inject
>> and
>> >> we
>> >> >> can't honor it. If I were a user and tried to inject files when
>> >> creating
>> >> >> a server but they didn't show up in the guest, I'd open a support
>> >> ticket
>> >> >> against my cloud provider. So I don't think a warning (that only the
>> >> >> admin sees) is sufficient here. This isn't something that's
>> >> discoverable
>> >> >> from the API either, it's really host configuration / capability
>> >> >> (something we still need to tackle).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So I propose that we fail the server create request in this case
>> since
>> >> >> the user asked nova to inject files but n-cpu is configured to not
>> >> allow
>> >> >> that.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'd also think that this should trigger a reschedule to another
>> >> compute.
>> >> >> However, if all computes have disabled file injection, which is the
>> >> >> default:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/0c0f60031acba11d0bab0617f68b95d9b5eb8d1d/nova/conf/libvirt.py#L66
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Then they'll retry 3 times and fail with an instance in error
>> state. So
>> >> >> I'm not sure if rescheduling in this case is useful. I'd think that
>> >> >> deployments are either allowing file injection globally (if using
>> >> >> libvirt) of they aren't, but would need some operators to chime in
>> >> here.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Matt Riedemann
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 7
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 09:09:20 -0700
>> >> >> From: OpenStack Mailing List Archive <corpqa at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Syntribos Error : AttributeError:
>> 'tuple'
>> >> >> object has no attribute 'headers'
>> >> >> Message-ID: <1d1282b2e4d7eb4d4c701c0ed0b55551 at openstack.nimeyo.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160703/3013a3a5/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 8
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 19:54:19 +0300
>> >> >> From: Valeriy Ponomaryov <vponomaryov at mirantis.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [manila][stable] liberty periodic
>> bitrot
>> >> >> jobs have been failing more than a week
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CAPnpNOVTxe6PcuLbZ_3uu-fGZeReVw0G=
>> >> >> pko8KTP3AKWQx-8sQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Matt, it is not related to branch. Tempest jobs do run only when
>> >> specific
>> >> >> files are changed. See [1].
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [1]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/f269e732/zuul/layout.yaml#L1066
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Matt Riedemann <
>> >> >> mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On 7/1/2016 8:18 PM, Ravi, Goutham wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Thanks Matt.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334220 adds the upper
>> constraints.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Goutham
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 7/1/16, 5:08 PM, "Matt Riedemann" <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com
>> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The manila periodic stable/liberty jobs have been failing for at
>> >> least
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> week.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> It looks like manila isn't using upper-constraints when running
>> unit
>> >> >> >> tests, not even on stable/mitaka or master. So in liberty it's
>> >> pulling
>> >> >> >> in uncapped oslo.utils even though the upper constraint for
>> >> oslo.utils
>> >> >> >> in liberty is 3.2.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Who from the manila team is going to be working on fixing this,
>> >> either
>> >> >> >> via getting upper-constraints in place in the tox.ini for manila
>> (on
>> >> >> all
>> >> >> >> supported branches) or performing some kind of workaround in the
>> >> code?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I noticed that there is no Tempest / devstack job run against the
>> >> >> > stable/liberty change - why is there no integration testing of
>> >> Manila in
>> >> >> > stable/liberty outside of 3rd party CI (which is not voting)?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Matt Riedemann
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Kind Regards
>> >> >> Valeriy Ponomaryov
>> >> >> www.mirantis.com
>> >> >> vponomaryov at mirantis.com
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160703/b9601a80/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 9
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 15:26:23 -0400
>> >> >> From: Henry Gessau <HenryG at gessau.net>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] New Python35 Jobs coming
>> >> >> Message-ID: <314a3c1e-7111-38ab-3545-d3cb302a4d02 at gessau.net>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Clark Boylan <cboylan at sapwetik.org> wrote:
>> >> >> > The infra team is working on taking advantage of the new Ubuntu
>> >> Xenial
>> >> >> > release including running unittests on python35. The current plan
>> is
>> >> to
>> >> >> > get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336272/ merged next Tuesday
>> >> (July
>> >> >> > 5, 2016). This will add non voting python35 tests restricted to >=
>> >> >> > master/Newton on all projects that had python34 testing.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The expectation is that in many cases python35 tests will just
>> work
>> >> if
>> >> >> > python34 testing was also working. If this is the case for your
>> >> project
>> >> >> > you can propose a change to openstack-infra/project-config to make
>> >> these
>> >> >> > jobs voting against your project. You should only need to edit
>> >> >> > jenkins/jobs/projects.yaml and zuul/layout.yaml and remove the
>> '-nv'
>> >> >> > portion of the python35 jobs to do this.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We do however expect that there will be a large group of failed
>> tests
>> >> >> > too. If your project has a specific tox.ini py34 target to
>> restrict
>> >> >> > python3 testing to a specific list of tests you will need to add a
>> >> tox
>> >> >> > target for py35 that does the same thing as the py34 target. We
>> have
>> >> >> > also seen bug reports against some projects whose tests rely on
>> >> stable
>> >> >> > error messages from Python itself which isn't always the case
>> across
>> >> >> > version changes so these tests will need to be updated as well.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Note this change will not add python35 jobs for cases where
>> projects
>> >> >> > have special tox targets. This is restricted just to the default
>> py35
>> >> >> > unittesting.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > As always let us know if you questions,
>> >> >> > Clark
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How soon can projects replace py34 with py35?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I tried py35 for neutron locally, and it ran without errors.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 10
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 21:15:37 +0100
>> >> >> From: Dave Walker <email at daviey.com>
>> >> >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][horizon] Out of branch horizon
>> >> >> plugins?
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <
>> >> >> CACyjiAhWiOTvZjAKyibSC4wpHyK6c9+cNK0dzy_dFxSgX+ckAA at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Whilst writing a Kolla plugin, I noticed some issues with the way
>> >> Horizon
>> >> >> is configured in Kolla.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Horizon is increasingly embracing a plugin architecture with UI's
>> and
>> >> >> Dashboards being maintained outside of Horizon's tree.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> These can be found with the type:horizon-plugin tag in
>> >> >> openstack/governance
>> >> >> [0], with 16 projects at current.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This isn't really addressed in Kolla, and is a little awkward to
>> >> integrate
>> >> >> as the horizon docker image is pure horizon.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Some projects have a tools/register_plugin.sh which performs the
>> grunt
>> >> >> work, where as others require a workflow similar to:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> cp /path/to/projects/new/panel openstack_dashboard/local/enabled/
>> >> >> cp /path/to/local/defualt/settings
>> >> >> openstack_dashboard/local/local_settings.d/
>> >> >> cp /path/to/*policy.json openstack_dashboard/conf/
>> >> >> # compress if environment wants it
>> >> >> ./manage.py collectstatic
>> >> >> ./manage.py compress
>> >> >>
>> >> >> (Separately, it would be nice if this was standardised.. but not the
>> >> topic
>> >> >> of this thread)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It would seem logical to pack all of these into the horizon docker
>> >> image,
>> >> >> and add a symlink into dashboard/local/enabled via ansible,
>> policy.json
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> default settings with some conditionals if enabled_$service... but
>> this
>> >> >> will make the horizon docker image larger and more complicated.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What are your thoughts?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [0]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Kind Regards,
>> >> >> Dave Walker
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160703/dd00980b/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 11
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 17:20:42 -0700
>> >> >> From: Clint Byrum <clint at fewbar.com>
>> >> >> To: openstack-dev <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] New Python35 Jobs coming
>> >> >> Message-ID: <1467591512-sup-6679 at fewbar.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Excerpts from Henry Gessau's message of 2016-07-03 15:26:23 -0400:
>> >> >> > Clark Boylan <cboylan at sapwetik.org> wrote:
>> >> >> > > The infra team is working on taking advantage of the new Ubuntu
>> >> Xenial
>> >> >> > > release including running unittests on python35. The current
>> plan
>> >> is
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> > > get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336272/ merged next
>> Tuesday
>> >> >> (July
>> >> >> > > 5, 2016). This will add non voting python35 tests restricted to
>> >=
>> >> >> > > master/Newton on all projects that had python34 testing.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > The expectation is that in many cases python35 tests will just
>> >> work if
>> >> >> > > python34 testing was also working. If this is the case for your
>> >> >> project
>> >> >> > > you can propose a change to openstack-infra/project-config to
>> make
>> >> >> these
>> >> >> > > jobs voting against your project. You should only need to edit
>> >> >> > > jenkins/jobs/projects.yaml and zuul/layout.yaml and remove the
>> >> '-nv'
>> >> >> > > portion of the python35 jobs to do this.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > We do however expect that there will be a large group of failed
>> >> tests
>> >> >> > > too. If your project has a specific tox.ini py34 target to
>> restrict
>> >> >> > > python3 testing to a specific list of tests you will need to
>> add a
>> >> tox
>> >> >> > > target for py35 that does the same thing as the py34 target. We
>> >> have
>> >> >> > > also seen bug reports against some projects whose tests rely on
>> >> stable
>> >> >> > > error messages from Python itself which isn't always the case
>> >> across
>> >> >> > > version changes so these tests will need to be updated as well.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Note this change will not add python35 jobs for cases where
>> >> projects
>> >> >> > > have special tox targets. This is restricted just to the default
>> >> py35
>> >> >> > > unittesting.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > As always let us know if you questions,
>> >> >> > > Clark
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > How soon can projects replace py34 with py35?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I tried py35 for neutron locally, and it ran without errors.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I think we should be aggressive on python 3.5 vs. 3.4, since
>> anywhere
>> >> >> that shipped 3.4 also shipped 2.7. Otherwise we end up wasting time
>> on
>> >> >> whatever subtle differences there are.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 12
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:00:50 +0800
>> >> >> From: Gerard Braad <me at gbraad.nl>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [docker] Storage-driver and
>> loopback
>> >> >> usage?
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CAGrH30WswSoHyeSOSNse3kJcPwkZOdLxu=
>> >> >> Fd9ki7UGGu3Xw_ww at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi guys,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This weekend I have been looking into some issues I encountered with
>> >> >> `ostree` inside a Docker container, and this seemed to have been
>> >> >> caused by the use of loopback storage with device mapper. After this
>> >> >> experience I was wondering what Kolla did...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Usually for development purpose, or on a laptop, it is easy to just
>> >> >> work out-of-the-box. But I would not consider using devicemapper
>> after
>> >> >> this experience as a pleasant experience. I moved to all development
>> >> >> environment using OverlayFS, and will evaluate this for the time
>> >> >> being...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What do you guys think or use? And what about the quickstart? I was
>> >> >> unable to find a statement about this. I did find a change of the
>> >> >> storage-driver in `kolla/tools/setup_RedHat.sh` to btrfs... and what
>> >> >> is used in CI?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> regards,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Gerard
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Gerard Braad | http://gbraad.nl
>> >> >> [ Doing Open Source Matters ]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 13
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 03:25:06 +0000
>> >> >> From: Angus Lees <gus at inodes.org>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] upgrades vs rootwrap
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <
>> >> >> CAPA_H3fkw+MB_AjHVAmS29+viS07PJXdM3RukK0fhx-gv2fyRw at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 at 01:02 Matt Riedemann <
>> mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On 6/28/2016 4:56 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> >> >> > > On 06/28/2016 01:46 AM, Angus Lees wrote:
>> >> >> > >> Ok, thanks for the in-depth explanation.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> My take away is that we need to file any rootwrap updates as
>> >> >> exceptions
>> >> >> > >> for now (so releasenotes and grenade scripts).
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > That is definitely the fall back if there is no better idea.
>> >> However,
>> >> >> we
>> >> >> > > should try really hard to figure out if there is a non manual
>> way
>> >> >> > > through this. Even if that means some compat code that we keep
>> for
>> >> a
>> >> >> > > release to just bridge the gap.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > -Sean
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Walter had this for os-brick:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/329586/
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > That would fallback to rootwrap if privsep doesn't work / not
>> >> available.
>> >> >> > That could be a workaround for upgrading with os-brick for Newton,
>> >> with
>> >> >> > a big fat warning logged if we use it, and then drop it in Ocata
>> and
>> >> >> > require privsep.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yes, this is basically a version of "submit the rootwrap filter,
>> then
>> >> wait
>> >> >> 6 months before submitting the code that needs it". If we don't
>> wish
>> >> to
>> >> >> use the exception mechanism (or adjust the policy to upgrade conf
>> >> before
>> >> >> code as I described earlier), then we can certainly do this. Rather
>> >> than
>> >> >> log a big fat warning if we use privsep, we may as well just revert
>> the
>> >> >> privsep change for os-brick and then resubmit it next cycle.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This thread topic isn't actually about privsep however, although a
>> >> >> migration to privsep will mostly mitigate this in the future which
>> is
>> >> >> perhaps why it is causing topic collisions for everyone.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I see there are already a few other additions to the rootwrap
>> filters
>> >> in
>> >> >> nova/cinder (the comments suggest (nova) libvirt/imagebackend.py,
>> >> (cinder)
>> >> >> remotefs.py, and (both) vzstorage.py). The various privsep-only
>> >> >> suggestions about fallback strategies don't help in these other
>> >> >> examples. Any
>> >> >> corresponding code changes that rely on these new filters will also
>> >> need
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> be reverted and resubmitted during next cycle - or do what usually
>> >> happens
>> >> >> and slip under the radar as they are not exercised by grenade.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Gus
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/b8832f07/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 14
>> >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 23:41:22 -0400
>> >> >> From: Steve Martinelli <s.martinelli at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone] spec freeze on july 8th, 2016
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CAHc_MXHV+bj-c36=bDxUZ1SU=
>> >> >> FFy-jy2ssSnaVEHFxd3fLGFag at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The keystone spec freeze is on july 8th. I am in the process of
>> going
>> >> >> through the open specs [1]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I will be commenting if I think it is a potential candidate for the
>> >> Newton
>> >> >> based on how far along the spec is, its complexity, core reviewer
>> >> >> attention
>> >> >> and priority. (Thanks Matt R for the wording)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'd like spend the bulk of the next keystone meeting on Tuesday
>> >> discussing
>> >> >> the open specs. If you are authoring one, please try to attend.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [1]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/keystone-specs+status:open
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160703/046649b3/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 15
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:58:40 +0800
>> >> >> From: Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [docker] Storage-driver and
>> >> >> loopback usage?
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CAATxhGftHC_oJMkX-vabJugNCK+DBom6m3qGZj_051tZS=
>> >> >> 7fHg at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Gerard,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is what the docker official recommend[0]. In the prod env, the
>> >> they
>> >> >> recommend
>> >> >> using the direct-lvm driver.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Kolla has no recommendation now. In the dev process, i know someone
>> use
>> >> >> overlayfs,
>> >> >> some use btrfs. These two are both faster than others.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [0]
>> >> https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/storagedriver/selectadriver/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Gerard Braad <me at gbraad.nl> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi guys,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > This weekend I have been looking into some issues I encountered
>> with
>> >> >> > `ostree` inside a Docker container, and this seemed to have been
>> >> >> > caused by the use of loopback storage with device mapper. After
>> this
>> >> >> > experience I was wondering what Kolla did...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Usually for development purpose, or on a laptop, it is easy to
>> just
>> >> >> > work out-of-the-box. But I would not consider using devicemapper
>> >> after
>> >> >> > this experience as a pleasant experience. I moved to all
>> development
>> >> >> > environment using OverlayFS, and will evaluate this for the time
>> >> >> > being...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > What do you guys think or use? And what about the quickstart? I
>> was
>> >> >> > unable to find a statement about this. I did find a change of the
>> >> >> > storage-driver in `kolla/tools/setup_RedHat.sh` to btrfs... and
>> what
>> >> >> > is used in CI?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > regards,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Gerard
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Gerard Braad | http://gbraad.nl
>> >> >> > [ Doing Open Source Matters ]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >> Jeffrey Zhang
>> >> >> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/cf4c7da8/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 16
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 14:33:08 +1000
>> >> >> From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesketh at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the
>> >> >> world"
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <
>> >> >> CA+DTi5w-azo949HhOnp7gufu0Lsov77C1dUnHaBG_8SVneGD+g at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Jesse Pretorius <
>> >> >> Jesse.Pretorius at rackspace.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Now that OpenStack-Ansible has the final Swift kilo-eol tag
>> >> implemented
>> >> >> > we?ve requested a final tag [1]. Once that merges we are ready to
>> >> have
>> >> >> our
>> >> >> > kilo-eol tag implemented and the ?kilo? branch removed.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I assume you want to wait for the tag to merge before removing the
>> >> branch?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Just to make life interesting, we still have leftover ?juno? and
>> >> >> > ?icehouse? branches and would like to implement eol tags for them
>> >> too. I
>> >> >> > think we have the appropriate skips in place for the juno branch
>> so
>> >> >> there
>> >> >> > should be no funky post-tag jobs kicking off for them, but the
>> >> icehouse
>> >> >> > branch may end up with some unknown jobs kicking off. If you can
>> help
>> >> >> > identify the changes we need to get implemented into
>> project-config
>> >> >> then we
>> >> >> > can be rid of the old cruft.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The only tag job I can see for openstack-ansible* projects is the
>> >> >> releasenotes one. This should be harmless as it just generates the
>> >> notes
>> >> >> for mitaka and liberty branches. I'm going to hold off until the
>> final
>> >> tag
>> >> >> has merged anyway if you want to confirm this first.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> Josh
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Jesse
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > ------------------------------
>> >> >> > Rackspace Limited is a company registered in England & Wales
>> (company
>> >> >> > registered number 03897010) whose registered office is at 5
>> >> Millington
>> >> >> > Road, Hyde Park Hayes, Middlesex UB3 4AZ. Rackspace Limited
>> privacy
>> >> >> policy
>> >> >> > can be viewed at www.rackspace.co.uk/legal/privacy-policy - This
>> >> e-mail
>> >> >> > message may contain confidential or privileged information
>> intended
>> >> for
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > recipient. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the
>> enclosed
>> >> >> > material is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error,
>> >> >> please
>> >> >> > notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse at rackspace.com and delete
>> >> the
>> >> >> > original message. Your cooperation is appreciated.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/dfba39e6/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 17
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 07:18:41 +0200
>> >> >> From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] New Python35 Jobs coming
>> >> >> Message-ID: <5779F1B1.3080500 at suse.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 07/03/2016 09:26 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
>> >> >> > Clark Boylan <cboylan at sapwetik.org> wrote:
>> >> >> >> The infra team is working on taking advantage of the new Ubuntu
>> >> Xenial
>> >> >> >> release including running unittests on python35. The current plan
>> >> is to
>> >> >> >> get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336272/ merged next Tuesday
>> >> (July
>> >> >> >> 5, 2016). This will add non voting python35 tests restricted to
>> >=
>> >> >> >> master/Newton on all projects that had python34 testing.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The expectation is that in many cases python35 tests will just
>> work
>> >> if
>> >> >> >> python34 testing was also working. If this is the case for your
>> >> project
>> >> >> >> you can propose a change to openstack-infra/project-config to
>> make
>> >> >> these
>> >> >> >> jobs voting against your project. You should only need to edit
>> >> >> >> jenkins/jobs/projects.yaml and zuul/layout.yaml and remove the
>> '-nv'
>> >> >> >> portion of the python35 jobs to do this.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> We do however expect that there will be a large group of failed
>> >> tests
>> >> >> >> too. If your project has a specific tox.ini py34 target to
>> restrict
>> >> >> >> python3 testing to a specific list of tests you will need to add
>> a
>> >> tox
>> >> >> >> target for py35 that does the same thing as the py34 target. We
>> have
>> >> >> >> also seen bug reports against some projects whose tests rely on
>> >> stable
>> >> >> >> error messages from Python itself which isn't always the case
>> across
>> >> >> >> version changes so these tests will need to be updated as well.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Note this change will not add python35 jobs for cases where
>> projects
>> >> >> >> have special tox targets. This is restricted just to the default
>> >> py35
>> >> >> >> unittesting.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> As always let us know if you questions,
>> >> >> >> Clark
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > How soon can projects replace py34 with py35?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As soon as you think your project is ready, you can replace py34
>> with
>> >> >> py35 for master.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I tried py35 for neutron locally, and it ran without errors.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Then let it run for a day or two in our CI, discuss with neutron
>> team,
>> >> >> and send a patch for project-config to change the setup,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Andreas
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica:
>> >> jaegerandi
>> >> >> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
>> >> >> GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>> >> >> HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
>> >> >> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272
>> >> A126
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 18
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 08:59:50 +0300
>> >> >> From: Denis Makogon <lildee1991 at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] New Python35 Jobs coming
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CALzSdtnL==UYr7-WS54G=
>> >> >> HJrFxSHwESdF-W-W6Sz8F7jKe1wfQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2016-07-04 8:18 GMT+03:00 Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On 07/03/2016 09:26 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
>> >> >> > > Clark Boylan <cboylan at sapwetik.org> wrote:
>> >> >> > >> The infra team is working on taking advantage of the new Ubuntu
>> >> >> Xenial
>> >> >> > >> release including running unittests on python35. The current
>> plan
>> >> is
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> > >> get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336272/ merged next
>> Tuesday
>> >> >> (July
>> >> >> > >> 5, 2016). This will add non voting python35 tests restricted
>> to >=
>> >> >> > >> master/Newton on all projects that had python34 testing.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> The expectation is that in many cases python35 tests will just
>> >> work
>> >> >> if
>> >> >> > >> python34 testing was also working. If this is the case for your
>> >> >> project
>> >> >> > >> you can propose a change to openstack-infra/project-config to
>> make
>> >> >> these
>> >> >> > >> jobs voting against your project. You should only need to edit
>> >> >> > >> jenkins/jobs/projects.yaml and zuul/layout.yaml and remove the
>> >> '-nv'
>> >> >> > >> portion of the python35 jobs to do this.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> We do however expect that there will be a large group of failed
>> >> tests
>> >> >> > >> too. If your project has a specific tox.ini py34 target to
>> >> restrict
>> >> >> > >> python3 testing to a specific list of tests you will need to
>> add a
>> >> >> tox
>> >> >> > >> target for py35 that does the same thing as the py34 target. We
>> >> have
>> >> >> > >> also seen bug reports against some projects whose tests rely on
>> >> >> stable
>> >> >> > >> error messages from Python itself which isn't always the case
>> >> across
>> >> >> > >> version changes so these tests will need to be updated as well.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Note this change will not add python35 jobs for cases where
>> >> projects
>> >> >> > >> have special tox targets. This is restricted just to the
>> default
>> >> py35
>> >> >> > >> unittesting.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> As always let us know if you questions,
>> >> >> > >> Clark
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > How soon can projects replace py34 with py35?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > As soon as you think your project is ready, you can replace py34
>> with
>> >> >> > py35 for master.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > I tried py35 for neutron locally, and it ran without errors.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Then let it run for a day or two in our CI, discuss with neutron
>> >> team,
>> >> >> > and send a patch for project-config to change the setup,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Can confirm that nova, glance, cinder, heat clients are py35
>> >> compatible.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Andreas
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica:
>> >> jaegerandi
>> >> >> > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
>> >> >> > GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>> >> >> > HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
>> >> >> > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C
>> C272
>> >> A126
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/8da19224/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 19
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 14:12:01 +0800
>> >> >> From: Zhenyu Zheng <zhengzhenyulixi at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Questions about instance
>> actions'
>> >> >> update and finish
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CAO0b__-CoU9UDaVQEFrtL9=
>> >> >> L92TbZhJUwkYfs9iA7R-xVM+pwg at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm willing to work on this, should this be a Blueprint for O?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Matt Riedemann <
>> >> >> mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On 7/3/2016 6:21 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 2016-07-02 2:32 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague <sean at dague.net
>> >> >> >> <mailto:sean at dague.net>>:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 06/30/2016 08:31 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On 6/29/2016 10:10 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>> On 6/29/2016 6:40 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016, at 09:27 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>> How about I sync updated_at and created_at in my patch,
>> >> and
>> >> >> >> leave the
>> >> >> >> >>>>> finish to the other BP, by this way, I can use
>> updated_at
>> >> for
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >>>>> timestamp filter I added and it don't need to change
>> again
>> >> >> once
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >>>>> finish BP is complete.
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> Sounds good to me.
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> It's been a long day so my memory might be fried, but the
>> >> >> options
>> >> >> >> we
>> >> >> >> >>> talked about in the API meeting were:
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> 1. Setting updated_at = created_at when the instance
>> action
>> >> >> >> record is
>> >> >> >> >>> created. Laski likes this, I'm not crazy about it,
>> >> especially
>> >> >> >> since we
>> >> >> >> >>> don't do that for anything else.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I would actually like for us to do this generally. I have
>> the
>> >> >> same
>> >> >> >> > thinking as Ed does elsewhere in this thread, the creation
>> of
>> >> a
>> >> >> >> record
>> >> >> >> > is an update of that record. So take my comments as
>> applying
>> >> to
>> >> >> Nova
>> >> >> >> > overall and not just this issue.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Agree. Also it just simplifies a number of things. We should
>> >> just
>> >> >> >> start
>> >> >> >> doing this going forward, and probably put some online data
>> >> >> migrations
>> >> >> >> in place next cycle to update all the old records. Once
>> >> updated_at
>> >> >> >> can't
>> >> >> >> be null, we can handle things like this a bit better.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The marker should be a column with UniqueConstraint, the
>> updated_at
>> >> is
>> >> >> >> not. But if we say the accuracy is ok, there will have problem
>> with
>> >> >> >> updated_at as None.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Yeah I thought about this later, we don't use a timestamp field
>> as a
>> >> >> > marker for anything else, and as noted it's not a non-nullable
>> unique
>> >> >> > field, plus it's mutable which worries me for a marker field
>> >> (created_at
>> >> >> > wouldn't change, but updated_at could).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Anyway, we already freeze... probably we can begin to fix the
>> >> >> updated_at
>> >> >> >> problem first.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>> 2. Update the instance action's updated_at when instance
>> >> action
>> >> >> >> events
>> >> >> >> >>> are created. I like this since the instance action is
>> like a
>> >> >> >> parent
>> >> >> >> >>> resource and the event is the child, so when we
>> >> create/modify
>> >> >> an
>> >> >> >> event
>> >> >> >> >>> we can consider it an update to the parent. Laski thought
>> >> this
>> >> >> >> might be
>> >> >> >> >>> weird UX given we don't expose instance action events in
>> the
>> >> >> REST
>> >> >> >> API
>> >> >> >> >>> unless you're an admin. This is also probably not
>> something
>> >> >> we'd
>> >> >> >> do for
>> >> >> >> >>> other related resources like server groups and server
>> group
>> >> >> >> members (but
>> >> >> >> >>> we don't page on those either right now).
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Right. My concern is just that the ordering of actions can
>> >> change
>> >> >> >> based
>> >> >> >> > on events happening which are not visible to the user.
>> However
>> >> >> >> thinking
>> >> >> >> > about it further we don't really allow multiple actions at
>> >> once,
>> >> >> >> except
>> >> >> >> > for a few special cases like delete, so this may not end up
>> >> >> >> affecting
>> >> >> >> > any ordering as actions are mostly serial. I think this is
>> a
>> >> fine
>> >> >> >> > solution for the issue at hand. I just think #1 is a more
>> >> general
>> >> >> >> > solution.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> 3. Order the results by updated_at,created_at so that if
>> >> >> >> updated_at
>> >> >> >> >>> isn't set for older records, created_at will be used. I
>> >> think
>> >> >> we
>> >> >> >> all
>> >> >> >> >>> agreed in the meeting to do this regardless of #1 or #2
>> >> above.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I kind of hate that as the order, because then the marker is
>> >> going
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> have to be really funny double timestamp, right?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The marker only needs to fill with the unique value. There isn't
>> any
>> >> >> >> problem order with multiple column. Some time we need order with
>> >> >> >> mulitple column for stable order when the first order column is
>> >> >> >> without UniqueConstraint.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I guess that's the one thing I don't see in this patch is a
>> >> >> functional
>> >> >> >> test that actually loads up instance actions and iterates
>> >> through
>> >> >> >> demonstrating the pagination.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> -Sean
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Sean Dague
>> >> >> >> http://dague.net
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >>
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >> <
>> >> >>
>> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Matt Riedemann
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/30f578fa/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 20
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 13:17:11 +0700
>> >> >> From: Renat Akhmerov <renat.akhmerov at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral][osc-lib][openstackclient] is
>> it
>> >> >> too early for orc-lib?
>> >> >> Message-ID: <08997983-1194-4693-AD10-0DF81D014289 at gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Ok, based on what has been said here I suggest we keep this code for
>> >> now.
>> >> >> The changes were really minimal. If it creates some problems for us
>> we
>> >> can
>> >> >> always easily revert.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Renat Akhmerov
>> >> >> @Nokia
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On 01 Jul 2016, at 04:57, Steve Martinelli <
>> s.martinelli at gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The crux of this, as Dean stated, is if the library wants OSC to
>> >> always
>> >> >> be pulled in (along with its many dependencies). We've seen folks
>> >> include
>> >> >> it in requirements, test-requirements, or even not at all (just
>> >> document
>> >> >> that OSC needs to be installed).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I tossed up the idea with the ironic team of leveraging "extras"
>> >> field
>> >> >> to list OSC as optional, the change would look like:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --- a/setup.cfg
>> >> >> > +++ b/setup.cfg
>> >> >> > @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ classifier =
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > +[extras]
>> >> >> > +cli =
>> >> >> > + python-openstackclient>=3.0.0 # Apache-2.0
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > So, if a user wanted to install just the python binding of
>> >> ironicclient
>> >> >> or mistralclient, they would do $ pip install python-ironicclient;
>> if a
>> >> >> user wanted the CLI as well.. $ pip install python-ironicclient[cli]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Just an idea, it may be overkill and completely horrible.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dean Troyer <dtroyer at gmail.com
>> >> >> <mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Hardik <
>> >> >> hardik.parekh at nectechnologies.in <mailto:
>> >> hardik.parekh at nectechnologies.in>>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Regarding osc-lib we have mainly two changes.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1) Used "utils" which is moved from openstackclient.common.utils
>> to
>> >> >> osc_lib.utils
>> >> >> > 2) We used "command" which wrapped in osc_lib from cliff.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > So I think there is no harm in keeping osc_lib.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Admittedly the change to include osc-lib is a little early, I
>> would
>> >> >> have preferred until the other parts of it were a bit more stable.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Also, I guess we do not need openstackclient to be installed with
>> >> >> mistralclient as if mistral is used in standalone mode
>> >> >> > there is no need of openstackclient.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The choice to include OSC as a dependency of a plugin/library
>> rests
>> >> >> entirely on the plugin team, and that will usually be determined by
>> the
>> >> >> answer to the question "Do you want all users of your library to
>> have
>> >> OSc
>> >> >> installed even if they do not use it?" or alternatively "Do you
>> want
>> >> to
>> >> >> make your users remember to install OSC after installing the
>> plugin?"
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Note that we do intend to have the capability on osc-lib to build
>> an
>> >> >> OSC-like stand-alone binary for plugins that would theoretically
>> make
>> >> >> installing OSC optional for stand-alone client users. This is not
>> >> complete
>> >> >> yet, and as I said above, one reason I wish osc-lib had not been
>> merged
>> >> >> into plugin requirements yet. That said, as long as you don't use
>> >> those
>> >> >> bits yet you will be fine, the utils, command, etc bits are stable,
>> it
>> >> is
>> >> >> the clientmanager and shell parts that are still being developed.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > dt
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Dean Troyer
>> >> >> > dtroyer at gmail.com <mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <
>> >> >>
>> http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> <
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/b0a28ef7/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 21
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 08:22:11 +0200
>> >> >> From: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart at redhat.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra][ci] bulk repeating a test
>> >> >> job on a single review in parallel ?
>> >> >> Message-ID: <20160704062211.hunhz5zexs42lh43 at eukaryote>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 02:35:34PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> >> >> > On 2016-07-01 15:39:10 +0200 (+0200), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>> >> >> > > [Snip description of some nice debugging.]
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > > I'd really love it if there was
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > 1. the ability to request checking of just specific jobs eg
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > "recheck gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-full"
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Yes, this would really be desirable. I recall once asking this
>> >> exact
>> >> >> > > question on #openstack-infra, but can't find Infra team's
>> response
>> >> to
>> >> >> > > that.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The challenge here is that you want to make sure it can't be used
>> to
>> >> >> > recheck individual jobs until you have them all passing (like
>> >> >> > picking a pin and tumbler lock). The temptation to recheck-spam
>> >> >> > nondeterministically failing changes is already present, but this
>> >> >> > would make it considerably easier still for people to introduce
>> new
>> >> >> > nondeterministic failures in projects. Maybe if it were tied to a
>> >> >> > special pipeline type, and then we set it only for the
>> experimental
>> >> >> > pipeline or something?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If it reduces nondeterministic spam for the CI Infra, and makes us
>> >> >> achieve the task at hand, sure. [/me need to educate himself a
>> >> >> bit more on the Zuul pipeline infrastructure.]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Worth filing this (and your 'idle pipeline' thought below) in the
>> Zuul
>> >> >> tracker here?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/679
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > > > 2. the ability to request this recheck to run multiple
>> >> >> > > > times in parallel. eg if i just repeat the 'recheck'
>> >> >> > > > command many times on the same patchset # without
>> >> >> > > > waiting for results
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Yes, this too, would be _very_ useful for all the reasons you
>> >> >> described.
>> >> >> > [...]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > In the past we've discussed the option of having an "idle
>> pipeline"
>> >> >> > which repeatedly runs specified jobs only when there are unused
>> >> >> > resources available, so that it doesn't significantly cut into our
>> >> >> > resource pool when we're under high demand but still allows to
>> >> >> > automatically collect a large amount of statistical data.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Anyway, hopefully James Blair can weigh in on this, since Zuul is
>> >> >> > basically in a feature freeze for a while to limit the number of
>> >> >> > significant changes we'll need to forward-port into the v3 branch.
>> >> >> > We'd want to discuss these new features in the context of Zuul v3
>> >> >> > instead.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Jeremy Stanley
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> /kashyap
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 22
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:10:47 +0800
>> >> >> From: Luck Dog <dfhuangg at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <
>> >> >> CAL-y67hjWJ7XrOUjLiMZGV2va_5z_921jxMN3YL1a-GCh+i58w at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hello everyone,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I am trying to run DevStack on Ubuntu 14.04 in a single VirtualBox.
>> An
>> >> >> error turns up before it successfully starts. Yesterday I clarified
>> >> this
>> >> >> question not clearly enough?so I make a supplication for it. My
>> steps
>> >> >> are:
>> >> >> 1), Git clone DevStack,
>> >> >> 2), Copy devstack/local.conf.sample to DevStack folder and rename
>> it to
>> >> >> local.conf.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> the finished steps before the error turns up are listed as follows:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:11:53.081 | stack.sh log
>> >> >> /opt/stack/logs/stack.sh.log.2016-06-29-171152
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:12:19.797 | Installing package prerequisites
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:15:27.224 | Installing OpenStack project source
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:24:43.323 | Installing Tricircle
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:24:55.979 | Starting RabbitMQ
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:25:00.731 | Configuring and starting MySQL
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:25:20.143 | Starting Keystone
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:43:18.591 | Configuring Glance
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:43:59.667 | Configuring Neutron
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:46:30.646 | Configuring Cinder
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:46:54.719 | Configuring Nova
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:48:23.175 | Configuring Tricircle
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:51:24.143 | Starting Glance
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:52:11.133 | Uploading images
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:52:45.460 | Starting Nova API
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:53:27.511 | Starting Neutron
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 09:54:21.476 | Creating initial neutron network elements
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The last errors when it stops running are:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Request body: {u'network': {u'router:external': True,
>> >> >> u'provider:network_type': u'flat', u'name': u'public',
>> >> >> u'provider:physical_network': u'public', u'admin_state_up':
>> >> True}}^[[00m
>> >> >> ^[[00;33mfrom (pid=29980) prepare_request_body
>> >> >> /opt/stack/neutron/neutron/api/v2/base.py:674^[[00m
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 17:56:04.359 ^[[00;32mDEBUG neutron.db.quota.driver
>> >> >> [^[[01;36mreq-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453 ^[[00;36madmin
>> >> >> 13869ba8005b480bbcbe17b2695fd5e2^[[00;32m]
>> ^[[01;35m^[[00;32mResources
>> >> >> subnetpool have unlimited quota limit. It is not required to
>> calculate
>> >> >> headroom ^[[00m ^[[00;33mfrom (pid=29980) make_reservation
>> >> >> /opt/stack/neutron/neutron/db/quota/driver.py:191^[[00m
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 17:56:04.381 ^[[00;32mDEBUG neutron.db.quota.driver
>> >> >> [^[[01;36mreq-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453 ^[[00;36madmin
>> >> >> 13869ba8005b480bbcbe17b2695fd5e2^[[00;32m]
>> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00;32mAttempting to
>> >> >> reserve 1 items for resource network. Total usage: 0; quota limit:
>> 10;
>> >> >> headroom:10^[[00m ^[[00;33mfrom (pid=29980) make_reservation
>> >> >> /opt/stack/neutron/neutron/db/quota/driver.py:223^[[00m
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 ^[[01;31mERROR neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> [^[[01;36mreq-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453 ^[[00;36madmin
>> >> >> 13869ba8005b480bbcbe17b2695fd5e2^[[01;31m] ^[[01;35m^[[01;31mcreate
>> >> >> failed^[[00m
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00mTraceback (most recent call last):
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> "/opt/stack/neutron/neutron/api/v2/resource.py",
>> >> >> line
>> >> >> 78, in resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m result = method(request=request, **args)
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m File "/opt/stack/neutron/neutron/api/v2/base.py",
>> line
>> >> >> 424, in create
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m return self._create(request, body, **kwargs)
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> >> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_db/api.py", line 148,
>> in
>> >> >> wrapper
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m ectxt.value = e.inner_exc
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> >> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py",
>> line
>> >> 221,
>> >> >> in __exit__
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m self.force_reraise()
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> >> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py",
>> line
>> >> 197,
>> >> >> in force_reraise
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m six.reraise(self.type_, self.value, self.tb)
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> >> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_db/api.py", line 138,
>> in
>> >> >> wrapper
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m return f(*args, **kwargs)
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m File "/opt/stack/neutron/neutron/api/v2/base.py",
>> line
>> >> >> 535, in _create
>> >> >> [[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m return obj_creator(request.context, **kwargs)
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> "/opt/stack/tricircle/tricircle/network/plugin.py",
>> >> >> line 238, in create_network
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m is_external =
>> >> >> self._ensure_az_set_for_external_network(net_data)
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m File
>> >> "/opt/stack/tricircle/tricircle/network/plugin.py",
>> >> >> line 184, in _ensure_az_set_for_external_network
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m raise t_exceptions.ExternalNetPodNotSpecify()
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00mExternalNetPodNotSpecify: Pod for external network
>> not
>> >> >> specified
>> >> >> ^[[01;31m2016-06-29 17:56:04.425 TRACE neutron.api.v2.resource
>> >> >> ^[[01;35m^[[00m
>> >> >> 2016-06-29 17:56:04.439 ^[[00;36mINFO neutron.wsgi
>> >> >> [^[[01;36mreq-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453 ^[[00;36madmin
>> >> >> 13869ba8005b480bbcbe17b2695fd5e2^[[00;36m]
>> ^[[01;35m^[[00;36m127.0.0.1
>> >> - -
>> >> >> [29/Jun/2016 17:56:04] "POST /v2.0/networks.json HTTP/1.1" 500 368
>> >> >> 0.147805^[[00m
>> >> >>
>> >> >> the final printed errors on terminal are:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Request Failed: internal server error while processing your request.
>> >> >> Neutron server returns request_ids:
>> >> >> ['req-e97f6276-8e19-408b-829a-004a31256453']
>> >> >> lib/neutron_plugins/services/l3:create_neutron_initial_network:203
>> >> >> lib/neutron_plugins/services/l3:create_neutron_initial_network:207
>> >> >> [ERROR] /home/sword/DevStack/functions-common:207 Failure creating
>> >> >> EXT_NET_ID for public
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I don't know whether it is my wrong configuration of computer or
>> the
>> >> >> server error, I wish someone can help me with the problem. thanks!
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/a5c3d6b4/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 23
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 09:14:00 +0200
>> >> >> From: Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] New Python35 Jobs coming
>> >> >> Message-ID: <dd699b65-c199-2ec5-4e4a-70236971d5d4 at redhat.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Le 04/07/2016 ? 07:59, Denis Makogon a ?crit :
>> >> >> > Then let it run for a day or two in our CI, discuss with
>> neutron
>> >> >> team,
>> >> >> > and send a patch for project-config to change the setup,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Can confirm that nova, glance, cinder, heat clients are py35
>> >> compatible.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> tox.ini of Nova, Swift and Trove need to be modified to copy/paste
>> the
>> >> >> whitelist of tests running on Python 3. Fix for Nova:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336432/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Victor
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 24
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:25:07 +0300
>> >> >> From: Elena Ezhova <eezhova at mirantis.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Cc: "openstack at lists.openstack.org" <openstack at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack Mitaka Neutron LBaaS Question
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CAFZxAhh=S0QfS+K=
>> >> >> Jtgmx26TMH_goxYFEibKkBmVWLowL7FGUQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You also have to configure Octavia on your controller. The most
>> >> >> straightforward way would be to follow the steps that are done in
>> >> Octavia
>> >> >> DevStack plugin
>> >> >> <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/openstack/octavia/blob/stable/mitaka/devstack/plugin.sh
>> >> >> >.
>> >> >> There is also an overview presentation
>> >> >> <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1AqmF3BnKLLu1W1n-XT5MSfVYrGue1JIwKSvjbWgGA6s/edit#slide=id.p4
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> which
>> >> >> has some troubleshooting tips.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Elena
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:24 AM, zhihao wang <
>> wangzhihaocom at hotmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Dear OpenStack Dev member:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > May I ask you some question about neutron lbaaS?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > How to install the neutron LBaaS with Octavia in Mitaka?
>> >> >> > I followed these two guide ,but which one I should use? (My
>> >> openstack is
>> >> >> > Mitaka , 1 controller, 2 compute nodes)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/HowToRun --
>> Ubuntu
>> >> >> > Packages Setup
>> >> >> >
>> >>
>> http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/adv-config-lbaas.html
>> >> >> > -- Configuring LBaaS v2 with Octavia
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Here is what I did:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > pip install octavia
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > and then :
>> >> >> > vim /etc/neutron/neutron.conf
>> >> >> > service_plugins =
>> >> >> >
>> >> router,neutron_lbaas.services.loadbalancer.plugin.LoadBalancerPluginv2
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > [service_providers]
>> >> >> > service_provider =
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> LOADBALANCERV2:Octavia:neutron_lbaas.drivers.octavia.driver.OctaviaDriver:default
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /etc/openstack-dashboard/local_settings.py
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > OPENSTACK_NEUTRON_NETWORK = {
>> >> >> > 'enable_lb': True
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And then I restart all the neutron service and apache server
>> >> >> > service neutron-server restart
>> >> >> > service neutron-dhcp-agent restart
>> >> >> > service neutron-metadata-agent restart
>> >> >> > service neutron-l3-agent restart
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > but and then i ran the command neutron agent-list, it return
>> this. I
>> >> am
>> >> >> > wondering what is wrong with this? how can I install Neutron LaaS?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > root at controller:~# neutron agent-list
>> >> >> > Unable to establish connection to
>> >> >> http://controller:9696/v2.0/agents.json
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Please help
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks so much
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks
>> >> >> > Wally
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/26f31912/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 25
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 09:38:19 +0200
>> >> >> From: Antoni Segura Puimedon <toni+openstackml at midokura.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CAP8JW8DxfO+KMPKriHST2w-3k_zRKi_yKu6j=8j2En=
>> >> >> QqR3u4A at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Doug Hellmann <
>> doug at doughellmann.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2016-07-01 15:05:30
>> +0000:
>> >> >> > > On 2016-07-01 08:26:13 -0500 (-0500), Monty Taylor wrote:
>> >> >> > > [...]
>> >> >> > > > Check with Doug Hellman about namespaces. We used to use them
>> in
>> >> >> some
>> >> >> > > > oslo things and had to step away from them because of some
>> pretty
>> >> >> weird
>> >> >> > > > and horrible breakage issues.
>> >> >> > > [...]
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Or read the associated Oslo spec from when that was done:
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > <URL:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/kilo/drop-namespace-packages.html
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Yes, please don't use python namespaces. It's a cool feature, as
>> you
>> >> >> > say, but the setuptools implementation available for Python 2 has
>> >> some
>> >> >> > buggy edge cases that we hit on a regular basis before moving
>> back to
>> >> >> > regular packages. It might be something we could look into again
>> when
>> >> >> > we're running only on Python 3, since at that point the feature is
>> >> built
>> >> >> > into the language.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For kuryr-kubernetes we target only Python3, I wonder if we could
>> move
>> >> >> kuryr-libnetwork
>> >> >> to be python3 only and, if that were the case, how this alters the
>> >> >> situation for namespace
>> >> >> packages.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Doug
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/15cceea8/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 26
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:13:28 +0800
>> >> >> From: Damon Wang <damon.devops at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][upgrades] Bi-weekly upgrades
>> >> >> work status. 6/20/2016
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <
>> >> >> CABZYMH4S8tc3XxAQbgRsuE2YyDwo6rf5v2u7u0KF+wFtceRaWw at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Very glad to see *Bi-weekly Upgrades Work Status*, besides, we
>> >> >> (UnitedStack) are also writing a Chinese version of weekly neutron
>> >> status:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://bit.ly/29nTorX
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We wrote from 4.3 and now have wrote 12 pieces. :-D
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Wei Wang
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2016-06-20 21:58 GMT+08:00 Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > (It?s not really bi-weekly since I missed it the previous week.
>> This
>> >> >> > report is for the last 3 weeks. I will try to keep a more regular
>> >> >> schedule
>> >> >> > for those updates in the future.)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > OK. What?s new in neutron upgrades since last update?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1. For the most part, the team works on migrating existing code
>> base
>> >> to
>> >> >> > using versioned objects.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > What landed:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > - base db plugin switched to objects for subnetpools:
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/300056
>> >> >> > - get_object(s) API now allows to pass renamed fields as filters:
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/327249
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > What?s in the queue:
>> >> >> > - utilizing DNSNameServer object in the code:
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/326477
>> >> >> > - security groups object: https://review.openstack.org/284738
>> >> >> > - *PortSecurity objects: https://review.openstack.org/327257
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > There are things still crafting worth mentioning:
>> >> >> > - subnet adoption in db code: https://review.openstack.org/321001
>> >> >> > - subnet object adjustments: https://review.openstack.org/331009
>> >> >> > - address scope adoption:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308005/
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A lot of api test coverage for sorting and pagination happened.
>> That
>> >> is
>> >> >> > something that we push for before we switch resources to using
>> >> objects
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> > avoid potential regressions. Things that landed:
>> >> >> > - next/prev href links tests: https://review.openstack.org/318270
>> >> >> > - subnet tests: https://review.openstack.org/329340
>> >> >> > - subnetpools tests: https://review.openstack.org/327081
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We have a lot more related patches though, including test
>> coverage as
>> >> >> well
>> >> >> > as enabling sorting/pagination for all installations. All those
>> are
>> >> >> tracked
>> >> >> > under:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open++(topic:bug/1566514+OR+topic:bug/1591981)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Reviews for ^ are highly welcome!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > There were other related changes that landed in master:
>> >> >> > - migrated code from using private ._context attributes to
>> >> .obj_context:
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/283616
>> >> >> > - added type information to ObjectNotFound exception:
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/327582
>> >> >> > - NetworkDhcpAgentBinding model moved to a separate module:
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/328452
>> >> >> > - get_object() switched to using _query_model to support RBAC
>> >> filtering:
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/326361/
>> >> >> > - query filter hook added to objects:
>> >> >> https://review.openstack.org/328304
>> >> >> > - qos policy filtering by ?shared? field is fixed by utilizing ^:
>> >> >> > https://review.openstack.org/328313
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2. As for multinode grenade testing, there was little progress on
>> >> >> getting
>> >> >> > voting for the DVR job. This is something that I plan to tackle in
>> >> the
>> >> >> near
>> >> >> > future.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > ===
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Team info:
>> >> >> > Upgrades Subteam has the weekly meetings on Mondays, 2PM UTC, wiki
>> >> page:
>> >> >> > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-Upgrades-Subteam
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > New patches are generally tracked under the following topic:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/adopt-oslo-versioned-objects-for-db
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Ihar
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/e0472273/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 27
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 01:17:29 -0700
>> >> >> From: Stephen Hindle <shindle at llnw.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla +
>> >> >> BiFrost integration
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CANPbtN_EUx_PV8FYEvQCaTR5XEKp98wik2USYfF=
>> >> >> EugBFXL2jg at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Steve
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm just suggesting the bi-frost stuff allow sufficient 'hooks'
>> for
>> >> >> operators to insert site specific setup. Not that Kolla/Bi-Frost
>> try
>> >> >> to handle 'everything'.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For instance LDAP... Horizon integration with LDAP would certainly
>> >> >> be within Kolla's perview. However, operators also use LDAP for
>> login
>> >> >> access to the host via PAM. This is site-specific, and outside of
>> >> >> Kolla's mission.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As an example of 'respecting existing configuration' - some sites
>> >> >> may use OpenVSwitch for host level networking. Kolla currently
>> starts
>> >> >> a new openvswitchdb container without checking if OpenVSwitch is
>> >> >> already running - this kills the host networking.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you'll pardon the pun, there are a 'host' of situations like
>> >> >> this, where operators will have to provide
>> >> >> (possibly many/detailed) site specific configurations to a bare
>> metal
>> >> >> host. Networking, Security, Backups, Monitoring/Logging, etc.
>> These
>> >> >> may all be subject to corporate wide policies that are
>> non-negotiable
>> >> >> and have to be followed.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Again, I realize Kolla/BiFrost can not be everything for everyone.
>> >> >> I just want to suggest that we provide well documented methods for
>> >> >> operators to insert site-specific roles/plays/whatever, and that we
>> >> >> take care to avoid 'stepping on' things.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have no idea as to what/how-many 'hooks' would be required. I
>> >> >> tend to think a simple 'before-bifrost' role and 'after-bifrost'
>> role
>> >> >> would be enough. However, others may have more input on that...
>> >> >> I like the idea of using roles, as that would allow you to
>> centralize
>> >> >> all your 'site-specific' bits. This way operators don't have to
>> >> >> modify the existing kolla/BiFrost stuff.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) <
>> stdake at cisco.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Stephen,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Responses inline.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 7/1/16, 11:35 AM, "Stephen Hindle" <shindle at llnw.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>Maybe I missed it - but is there a way to provide site specific
>> >> >> >>configurations? Things we will run into in the wild include:
>> >> >> >> Configuring multiple non-openstack nics
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We don?t have anything like this at present or planned. Would you
>> >> mind
>> >> >> > explaining the use case? Typically we in the Kolla community
>> expect
>> >> a
>> >> >> > production deployment to only deploy OpenStack, and not other
>> stacks
>> >> on
>> >> >> > top of the bare metal hardware. This is generally considered best
>> >> >> > practice at this time, unless of course your deploying something
>> on
>> >> top
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> > OpenStack that may need these nics. The reason is that OpenStack
>> >> itself
>> >> >> > managed alongside another application doesn?t know what it doesn't
>> >> know
>> >> >> > and can't handle capacity management or any of a number of other
>> >> things
>> >> >> > required to make an OpenStack cloud operate.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> IPMI configuration
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > BiFrost includes IPMI integration - assumption being we will just
>> use
>> >> >> > whatever BiFrost requires here for configuration.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Password integration with Corporate LDAP etc.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We have been asked several times for this functionality, and it
>> will
>> >> >> come
>> >> >> > naturally during either Newton or Occata.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Integration with existing SANs
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Cinder integrates with SANs, and in Newton, we have integration
>> with
>> >> >> > iSCSI. Unfortunately because of some controversy around how
>> glance
>> >> >> should
>> >> >> > provide images with regards to cinder, using existing SAN gear
>> with
>> >> >> iSCSI
>> >> >> > integration as is done by Cinder may not work as expected in a HA
>> >> setup.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Integration with existing corporate IPAM
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > No idea
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Corporate Security policy (firewall rules, sudo groups,
>> >> >> >>hosts.allow, ssh configs,etc)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > This is environmental specific and its hard to make a promise on
>> >> what we
>> >> >> > could deliver in a generic way that would be usable by everyone.
>> >> >> > Therefore our generic implementation will be the "bare minimum" to
>> >> get
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > system into an operational state. The things listed above are
>> >> outside
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > "bare minimum" iiuc.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>Thats just off the top of my head - I'm sure we'll run into
>> others.
>> >> I
>> >> >> >>tend to think the best way
>> >> >> >>to approach this is to allow some sort of 'bootstrap' role, that
>> >> could
>> >> >> >>be populated by the
>> >> >> >>operators. This should initially be empty (Kolla specific
>> >> 'bootstrap'
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Our bootstrap playbook is for launching BiFrost and bringing up
>> the
>> >> bare
>> >> >> > metal machines with an SSH credential. It appears from this
>> thread
>> >> we
>> >> >> > will have another playbook to do the bare metal initialization
>> >> (thiings
>> >> >> > like turning off firewalld, turning on chrony, I.e. Making the
>> bare
>> >> >> metal
>> >> >> > environment operational for OpenStack)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I think what you want is a third playbook which really belongs in
>> the
>> >> >> > domain of the operators to handle site-specific configuration as
>> >> >> required
>> >> >> > by corporate rules and the like.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>actions should be
>> >> >> >>in another role) to prevent confusion.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>We also have to be careful that kolla doesn't stomp on any
>> non-kolla
>> >> >> >>configuration...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Could you expand here. Kolla currently expects the machines under
>> >> its
>> >> >> > control to be only OpenStack machines, and not have other
>> >> applications
>> >> >> > running on them.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hope that was helpful.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Regards
>> >> >> > -steve
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Mooney, Sean K
>> >> >> >><sean.k.mooney at intel.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> >>>> From: Steven Dake (stdake) [mailto:stdake at cisco.com]
>> >> >> >>>> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 9:21 PM
>> >> >> >>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)
>> >> >> >>>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> >>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on
>> Kolla
>> >> +
>> >> >> >>>> BiFrost integration
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> On 6/27/16, 11:19 AM, "Devananda van der Veen"
>> >> >> >>>> <devananda.vdv at gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> >At a quick glance, this sequence diagram matches what I
>> >> >> >>>> >envisioned/expected.
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >I'd like to suggest a few additional steps be called out,
>> however
>> >> >> I'm
>> >> >> >>>> >not sure how to edit this so I'll write them here.
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >As part of the installation of Ironic, and assuming this is
>> done
>> >> >> >>>> >through Bifrost, the Actor should configure Bifrost for their
>> >> >> >>>> >particular network environment. For instance: what eth device
>> is
>> >> >> >>>> >connected to the IPMI network; what IP ranges can Bifrost
>> assign
>> >> to
>> >> >> >>>> >physical servers; and so on.
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >There are a lot of other options during the install that can
>> be
>> >> >> >>>> >changed, but the network config is the most important. Full
>> >> defaults
>> >> >> >>>> >for this roles' config options are here:
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>
>> https://github.com/openstack/bifrost/blob/master/playbooks/roles/bifro
>> >> >> >>>> s
>> >> >> >>>> >t-i
>> >> >> >>>> >ronic-install/defaults/main.yml
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >and documentation is here:
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>
>> https://github.com/openstack/bifrost/tree/master/playbooks/roles/bifro
>> >> >> >>>> s
>> >> >> >>>> >t-i
>> >> >> >>>> >ronic-install
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >Immediately before "Ironic PXE boots..." step, the Actor must
>> >> >> perform
>> >> >> >>>> >an action to "enroll" hardware (the "deployment targets") in
>> >> Ironic.
>> >> >> >>>> >This could be done in several ways: passing a YAML file to
>> >> Bifrost;
>> >> >> >>>> >using the Ironic CLI; or something else.
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >"Ironic reports success to the bootstrap operation" is
>> ambiguous.
>> >> >> >>>> >Ironic does not currently support notifications, so, to learn
>> the
>> >> >> >>>> >status of the deployments, you will need to poll the Ironic
>> API
>> >> (eg,
>> >> >> >>>> >"ironic node-list").
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Great,
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Thanks for the feedback. I'll integrate your changes into the
>> >> >> sequence
>> >> >> >>>> diagram when I have a free hour or so - whenever that is :)
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Regards
>> >> >> >>>> -steve
>> >> >> >>> [Mooney, Sean K] I agree with most of devananda points and had
>> >> come to
>> >> >> >>>similar
>> >> >> >>> Conlcutions.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> At a highlevel I think the workflow from 0 to cloud would be as
>> >> >> follow.
>> >> >> >>> Assuming you have one linux system.
>> >> >> >>> - clone http://github.com/openstack/kolla && cd kolla
>> >> >> >>> - tools/kolla-host build-host-deploy
>> >> >> >>> This will install ansible if not installed then invoke a
>> >> >> >>>playbook to install
>> >> >> >>> All build dependencies and generate the kolla-build.conf
>> >> >> >>>passwords.yml and global.yml.
>> >> >> >>> Install kolla python package
>> >> >> >>> - configure kolla-build.conf as required
>> >> >> >>> - tools/build.py or kolla-build to build image
>> >> >> >>> - configure global.yml and or biforst specific file
>> >> >> >>> This would involve specifying a file that can be used with
>> >> bifrost
>> >> >> >>>dynamic inventory.
>> >> >> >>> Configuring network interface for bifrost to use.
>> >> >> >>> Enable ssh-key generate or supply one to use as the key to us
>> >> when
>> >> >> >>>connecting to the servers post deploy.
>> >> >> >>> Configure diskimage builder options or supply path to a file
>> on
>> >> the
>> >> >> >>>system to use as your os image.
>> >> >> >>> - tools/kolla-host deploy-bifrost
>> >> >> >>> Deploys bifrost container.
>> >> >> >>> Copies images/keys
>> >> >> >>> Bootstraps bifrost and start services.
>> >> >> >>> - tools/kolla-host deploy-servers
>> >> >> >>> Invokes bifrost enroll and deploy dynamic then polls until all
>> >> >> >>> Servers are provisioned or a server fails.
>> >> >> >>> - tools/kolla-hosts bootstrap-servers
>> >> >> >>> Installs all kolla deploy dependencies
>> >> >> >>> Docker ect. This will also optionally do things such as
>> >> >> >>> Configure hugepages, configure cpu isolation, firewall
>> settings
>> >> >> >>> Or any other platform level config for example apply labels to
>> >> ceph
>> >> >> >>> Disks .
>> >> >> >>> This role will reboot the remote server at the end of the
>> role if
>> >> >> >>>required
>> >> >> >>> e.g. after installing The wily kernel on Ubuntu 14.04
>> >> >> >>> - configure global.yml as normal
>> >> >> >>> - tools/kolla-ansible prechecks (this should now pass)
>> >> >> >>> - tools/kolla-ansible deploy
>> >> >> >>> - profit
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> I think this largely agrees with the diagram you proposed but
>> has a
>> >> >> >>>couple of extra steps/details.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >Cheers,
>> >> >> >>>> >--Devananda
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >On 06/23/2016 06:54 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> >> Hey folks,
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >> I created the following sequence diagram to show my
>> thinking on
>> >> >> >>>> >>Ironic integration. I recognize some internals of the
>> recently
>> >> >> >>>> >>merged bifrost changes are not represented in this
>> diagram. I
>> >> >> would
>> >> >> >>>> >>like to see a bootstrap action do all of the necessary
>> things
>> >> to
>> >> >> >>>> >>bring up BiFrost in a container using Sean's WIP Kolla patch
>> >> >> >>>> followed
>> >> >> >>>> >>by bare metal minimal OS load followed by Kolla dependency
>> >> >> software
>> >> >> >>>> >>(docker-engine, docker-py, and ntpd) loading and
>> initialization.
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >> This diagram expects ssh keys to be installed on the
>> deployment
>> >> >> >>>> >>targets via BiFrost.
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >>
>> https://creately.com/diagram/ipt09l352/ROMDJH4QY1Avy1RYhbMUDraaQ4%3D
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >> Thoughts welcome, especially from folks in the Ironic
>> >> community or
>> >> >> >>>> >>Sean who is leading this work in Kolla.
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >> Regards,
>> >> >> >>>> >> -steve
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> >>_____________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>>> _
>> >> >> >>>> >>___
>> >> >> >>>> >>_
>> >> >> >>>> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >>>> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> >______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>>> _
>> >> >> >>>> >___ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)
>> >> >> >>>> >Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >>>> >OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>>> ___
>> >> >> >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
>> >> >> >>>> request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>>_________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>>_
>> >> >> >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >>> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >>>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>--
>> >> >> >>Stephen Hindle - Senior Systems Engineer
>> >> >> >>480.807.8189 480.807.8189
>> >> >> >>www.limelight.com Delivering Faster Better
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>Join the conversation
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>at Limelight Connect
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>--
>> >> >> >>The information in this message may be confidential. It is
>> intended
>> >> >> >>solely
>> >> >> >>for
>> >> >> >>the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any
>> >> >> disclosure,
>> >> >> >>copying or distribution of the message, or any action or omission
>> >> taken
>> >> >> >>by
>> >> >> >>you
>> >> >> >>in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please
>> >> >> immediately
>> >> >> >>contact the sender if you have received this message in error.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>__________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >>Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Stephen Hindle - Senior Systems Engineer
>> >> >> 480.807.8189 480.807.8189
>> >> >> www.limelight.com Delivering Faster Better
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Join the conversation
>> >> >>
>> >> >> at Limelight Connect
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> The information in this message may be confidential. It is intended
>> >> >> solely
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any
>> >> disclosure,
>> >> >> copying or distribution of the message, or any action or omission
>> >> taken by
>> >> >> you
>> >> >> in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please
>> >> immediately
>> >> >> contact the sender if you have received this message in error.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 28
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:02:53 +0800
>> >> >> From: hu.zhijiang at zte.com.cn
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [daisycloud-core] [kolla] Kolla Mitaka
>> >> >> requirementssupported by CentOS
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <
>> >> >>
>> OF685C0E9F.8AD230D6-ON48257FE6.002BD37A-48257FE6.002C2309 at zte.com.cn>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > As one of RDO maintainer, I strongly invite kolla, not to use
>> EPEL.
>> >> >> > It's proven very hard to prevent EPEL pushing broken updates, or
>> push
>> >> >> > updates to fit OpenStack requirements.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Actually, all the dependency above but ansible, docker and git
>> python
>> >> >> > modules are in CentOS Cloud SIG repositories.
>> >> >> > If you are interested to work w/ CentOS Cloud SIG, we can add
>> missing
>> >> >> > dependencies in our repositories.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I added [kolla] key word in the mail subject. Hope can get response
>> >> from
>> >> >> Kolla team about how to choose repos.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Zhijiang
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ???: Ha?kel <hguemar at fedoraproject.org>
>> >> >> ???: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> >> >> questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
>> >> >> ??: 2016-07-03 05:18
>> >> >> ??: [probably forge email???????]Re: [openstack-dev]
>> >> >> [daisycloud-core] Kolla Mitaka requirementssupported by CentOS
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2016-07-02 20:42 GMT+02:00 jason <huzhijiang at gmail.com>:
>> >> >> > Pip Package Name Supported By Centos CentOS Name Repo Name
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> ======================================================================================================================
>> >> >> > ansible yes
>> >> >> > ansible1.9.noarch epel
>> >> >> > docker-py yes
>> >> >> > python-docker-py.noarch extras
>> >> >> > gitdb yes
>> >> >> > python-gitdb.x86_64 epel
>> >> >> > GitPython yes
>> >> >> > GitPython.noarch epel
>> >> >> > oslo.config yes
>> >> >> > python2-oslo-config.noarch centos-openstack-mitaka
>> >> >> > pbr yes
>> >> >> > python-pbr.noarch epel
>> >> >> > setuptools yes
>> >> >> > python-setuptools.noarch base
>> >> >> > six yes
>> >> >> > python-six.noarch base
>> >> >> > pycrypto yes
>> >> >> > python2-crypto epel
>> >> >> > graphviz no
>> >> >> > Jinja2 no (Note: Jinja2 2.7.2 will be
>> installed as
>> >> >> > dependency by ansible)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As one of RDO maintainer, I strongly invite kolla, not to use EPEL.
>> >> >> It's proven very hard to prevent EPEL pushing broken updates, or
>> push
>> >> >> updates to fit OpenStack requirements.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Actually, all the dependency above but ansible, docker and git
>> python
>> >> >> modules are in CentOS Cloud SIG repositories.
>> >> >> If you are interested to work w/ CentOS Cloud SIG, we can add
>> missing
>> >> >> dependencies in our repositories.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > As above table shows, only two (graphviz and Jinja2) are not
>> >> supported
>> >> >> > by centos currently. As those not supported packages are definitly
>> >> not
>> >> >> > used by OpenStack as well as Daisy. So basicaly we can use pip to
>> >> >> > install them after installing other packages by yum. But note that
>> >> >> > Jinja2 2.7.2 will be installed as dependency while yum install
>> >> >> > ansible, so we need to using pip to install jinja2 2.8 after that
>> to
>> >> >> > overide the old one. Also note that we must make sure pip is ONLY
>> >> used
>> >> >> > for installing those two not supported packages.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > But before you trying to use pip, please consider these:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1) graphviz is just for saving image depend graph text file and is
>> >> not
>> >> >> > used by default and only used in build process if it is
>> configured to
>> >> >> > be used.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2) Jinja2 rpm can be found at
>> >> >> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6506,
>> >> which I
>> >> >> > think is suitable for CentOS. I have tested it.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > So, as far as Kolla deploy process concerned, there is no need to
>> use
>> >> >> > pip to install graphviz and Jinja2. Further more, if we do not
>> >> install
>> >> >> > Kolla either then we can get ride of pip totally!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I encourage all of you to think about not using pip any more for
>> >> >> > Daisy+Kolla, because pip hase a lot of overlaps between yum/rpm,
>> >> files
>> >> >> > may be overide back and force if not using them carefully. So not
>> >> >> > using pip will make things easier and make jump server more
>> cleaner.
>> >> >> > Any ideas?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> > Zhijiang
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Yours,
>> >> >> > Jason
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this
>> mail
>> >> >> (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and
>> >> confidential
>> >> >> and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you
>> are
>> >> not
>> >> >> an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or
>> >> other
>> >> >> dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly
>> >> prohibited.
>> >> >> If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and
>> notify us
>> >> >> immediately.
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/5317a4dc/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 29
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:36:30 +0800
>> >> >> From: Gerard Braad <me at gbraad.nl>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [daisycloud-core] [kolla] Kolla Mitaka
>> >> >> requirementssupported by CentOS
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <
>> >> >> CAGrH30XrpdS2D8UvPdcSMfMdJM1ExsKysaX_f0gLa4miUyf6oQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > ???: Ha?kel <hguemar at fedoraproject.org>
>> >> >> > As one of RDO maintainer, I strongly invite kolla, not to use
>> EPEL.
>> >> >> > It's proven very hard to prevent EPEL pushing broken updates, or
>> push
>> >> >> > updates to fit OpenStack requirements.
>> >> >> > Actually, all the dependency above but ansible, docker and git
>> python
>> >> >> > modules are in CentOS Cloud SIG repositories.
>> >> >> > If you are interested to work w/ CentOS Cloud SIG, we can add
>> missing
>> >> >> > dependencies in our repositories.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Interesting point, as currently the preference is to use docker
>> >> >> project's provided
>> >> >> packages for installing. This means that `docker-storage-setup` is
>> not
>> >> >> available.
>> >> >> This can actually be very helpful for CentOS-based deployments to
>> get a
>> >> >> production-ready environment setup.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Gerard
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Gerard Braad | http://gbraad.nl
>> >> >> [ Doing Open Source Matters ]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 30
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:35:00 +0800
>> >> >> From: hu.zhijiang at zte.com.cn
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] ??: [probably forge email???????]Re:
>> >> >> [daisycloud-core] Kolla Mitaka requirementssupported by
>> CentOS
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <
>> >> >>
>> OFCB261F89.4C7A08C6-ON48257FE6.002EC1D3-48257FE6.002F1386 at zte.com.cn>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Ha?kel
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Actually, all the dependency above but ansible, docker and git
>> python
>> >> >> > modules are in CentOS Cloud SIG repositories.
>> >> >> > If you are interested to work w/ CentOS Cloud SIG, we can add
>> missing
>> >> >> > dependencies in our repositories.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So currently Jinja2 version >= 2.8 is already in the CentOS Cloud
>> SIG
>> >> >> repository. could you please point a way to get it? That will be a
>> >> great
>> >> >> help for us to use kolla, because currenly we are using fedora repo
>> >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6506 to
>> get
>> >> >> Jinja2 version >= 2.8, but we are sure that CentOS Cloud SIG
>> >> repository
>> >> >> will be a more better choise than fedora repo.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ???: Ha?kel <hguemar at fedoraproject.org>
>> >> >> ???: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> >> >> questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
>> >> >> ??: 2016-07-03 05:18
>> >> >> ??: [probably forge email???????]Re: [openstack-dev]
>> >> >> [daisycloud-core] Kolla Mitaka requirementssupported by CentOS
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2016-07-02 20:42 GMT+02:00 jason <huzhijiang at gmail.com>:
>> >> >> > Pip Package Name Supported By Centos CentOS Name Repo Name
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> ======================================================================================================================
>> >> >> > ansible yes
>> >> >> > ansible1.9.noarch epel
>> >> >> > docker-py yes
>> >> >> > python-docker-py.noarch extras
>> >> >> > gitdb yes
>> >> >> > python-gitdb.x86_64 epel
>> >> >> > GitPython yes
>> >> >> > GitPython.noarch epel
>> >> >> > oslo.config yes
>> >> >> > python2-oslo-config.noarch centos-openstack-mitaka
>> >> >> > pbr yes
>> >> >> > python-pbr.noarch epel
>> >> >> > setuptools yes
>> >> >> > python-setuptools.noarch base
>> >> >> > six yes
>> >> >> > python-six.noarch base
>> >> >> > pycrypto yes
>> >> >> > python2-crypto epel
>> >> >> > graphviz no
>> >> >> > Jinja2 no (Note: Jinja2 2.7.2 will be
>> installed as
>> >> >> > dependency by ansible)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As one of RDO maintainer, I strongly invite kolla, not to use EPEL.
>> >> >> It's proven very hard to prevent EPEL pushing broken updates, or
>> push
>> >> >> updates to fit OpenStack requirements.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Actually, all the dependency above but ansible, docker and git
>> python
>> >> >> modules are in CentOS Cloud SIG repositories.
>> >> >> If you are interested to work w/ CentOS Cloud SIG, we can add
>> missing
>> >> >> dependencies in our repositories.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > As above table shows, only two (graphviz and Jinja2) are not
>> >> supported
>> >> >> > by centos currently. As those not supported packages are definitly
>> >> not
>> >> >> > used by OpenStack as well as Daisy. So basicaly we can use pip to
>> >> >> > install them after installing other packages by yum. But note that
>> >> >> > Jinja2 2.7.2 will be installed as dependency while yum install
>> >> >> > ansible, so we need to using pip to install jinja2 2.8 after that
>> to
>> >> >> > overide the old one. Also note that we must make sure pip is ONLY
>> >> used
>> >> >> > for installing those two not supported packages.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > But before you trying to use pip, please consider these:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1) graphviz is just for saving image depend graph text file and is
>> >> not
>> >> >> > used by default and only used in build process if it is
>> configured to
>> >> >> > be used.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2) Jinja2 rpm can be found at
>> >> >> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6506,
>> >> which I
>> >> >> > think is suitable for CentOS. I have tested it.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > So, as far as Kolla deploy process concerned, there is no need to
>> use
>> >> >> > pip to install graphviz and Jinja2. Further more, if we do not
>> >> install
>> >> >> > Kolla either then we can get ride of pip totally!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I encourage all of you to think about not using pip any more for
>> >> >> > Daisy+Kolla, because pip hase a lot of overlaps between yum/rpm,
>> >> files
>> >> >> > may be overide back and force if not using them carefully. So not
>> >> >> > using pip will make things easier and make jump server more
>> cleaner.
>> >> >> > Any ideas?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> > Zhijiang
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Yours,
>> >> >> > Jason
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this
>> mail
>> >> >> (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and
>> >> confidential
>> >> >> and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you
>> are
>> >> not
>> >> >> an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or
>> >> other
>> >> >> dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly
>> >> prohibited.
>> >> >> If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and
>> notify us
>> >> >> immediately.
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/a220fac9/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 31
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 09:40:22 +0100
>> >> >> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com>
>> >> >> To: Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
>> >> >> "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org"
>> >> >> <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Fail build
>> >> >> request if we can't inject files?
>> >> >> Message-ID: <20160704084021.GA3763 at redhat.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 10:08:04AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >> >> > I want to use the gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ssh in nova
>> since it
>> >> >> runs
>> >> >> > ssh validation + neutron + config drive + metadata service, which
>> >> will
>> >> >> test
>> >> >> > the virtual device tagging 2.32 microversion API (added last
>> week).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The job has a file injection test that fails consistently which is
>> >> >> keeping
>> >> >> > it from being voting.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > After debugging, the problem is the files to inject are silently
>> >> ignored
>> >> >> > because n-cpu is configured with libvirt.inject_partition=-2 by
>> >> default.
>> >> >> > That disables file injection:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/faf50a747e03873c3741dac89263a80112da915a/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L3030
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We don't even log a warning if the user requested files to inject
>> >> and we
>> >> >> > can't honor it. If I were a user and tried to inject files when
>> >> >> creating a
>> >> >> > server but they didn't show up in the guest, I'd open a support
>> >> ticket
>> >> >> > against my cloud provider. So I don't think a warning (that only
>> the
>> >> >> admin
>> >> >> > sees) is sufficient here. This isn't something that's discoverable
>> >> from
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > API either, it's really host configuration / capability
>> (something we
>> >> >> still
>> >> >> > need to tackle).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Won't the user provided files also get made available by the config
>> >> drive
>> >> >> /
>> >> >> metadata service ? I think that's the primary reason for file
>> >> injection
>> >> >> not
>> >> >> being a fatal problem. Oh that and the fact that we've wanted to
>> kill
>> >> it
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> at least 3 years now :-)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >> Daniel
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> |: http://berrange.com -o-
>> >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
>> >> >> |: http://libvirt.org -o-
>> >> >> http://virt-manager.org :|
>> >> >> |: http://autobuild.org -o-
>> >> >> http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
>> >> >> |: http://entangle-photo.org -o-
>> >> >> http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 32
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:16:09 +0200
>> >> >> From: Julien Danjou <julien at danjou.info>
>> >> >> To: Denis Makogon <lildee1991 at gmail.com>
>> >> >> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Python 3.4-3.5] Async python
>> >> >> clients
>> >> >> Message-ID: <m04m85bw6e.fsf at danjou.info>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Jun 26 2016, Denis Makogon wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > I know that some work in progress to bring Python 3.4
>> compatibility
>> >> to
>> >> >> > backend services and it is kinda hard question to answer, but i'd
>> >> like
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> > know if there are any plans to support asynchronous HTTP API
>> client
>> >> in
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > nearest future using aiohttp [1] (PEP-3156)?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I don't think there is unfortunately. Most clients now relies on
>> >> >> `requests', and unfortunately it's not async not it seems ready to
>> be
>> >> >> last time I checked.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Julien Danjou
>> >> >> // Free Software hacker
>> >> >> // https://julien.danjou.info
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> Name: signature.asc
>> >> >> Type: application/pgp-signature
>> >> >> Size: 800 bytes
>> >> >> Desc: not available
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/a07dc24c/attachment-0001.pgp
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 33
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:17:40 +0200
>> >> >> From: Sergii Golovatiuk <sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] - Nominate Maksim Malchuk to
>> Fuel
>> >> >> Library Core
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CA+HkNVup=8XN9cRU-Te7B13G5TM8LP=c7FLWskqte=
>> >> >> fyOBQMBg at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please welcome Maksim as he's just joined fuel-library Core Team!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Best regards,
>> >> >> Sergii Golovatiuk,
>> >> >> Skype #golserge
>> >> >> IRC #holser
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Adam Heczko <aheczko at mirantis.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Although I'm not Fuel core, +1 from me to Maksim. Maksim is not
>> only
>> >> >> > excellent engineer but also very friendly and helpful folk.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Georgy Kibardin <
>> >> >> gkibardin at mirantis.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> +1
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Kyrylo Galanov <
>> >> kgalanov at mirantis.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> +1
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Matthew Mosesohn <
>> >> >> >>> mmosesohn at mirantis.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>> +1. Maksim is an excellent reviewer.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Alex Schultz <
>> >> aschultz at mirantis.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> > +1
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya <
>> >> >> >>>> bdobrelia at mirantis.com>
>> >> >> >>>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >> On 06/27/2016 04:54 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> >> > I am very sorry for sending without subject. I am adding
>> >> >> subject to
>> >> >> >>>> >> > voting and my +1
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >> +1 from my side!
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> > --
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Best regards,
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Sergii Golovatiuk,
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Skype #golserge
>> >> >> >>>> >> > IRC #holser
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk
>> >> >> >>>> >> > <sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com <mailto:
>> sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com>>
>> >> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> > I would like to nominate Maksim Malchuk to
>> Fuel-Library
>> >> Core
>> >> >> >>>> team.
>> >> >> >>>> >> > He?s been doing a great job so far [0]. He?s #2
>> reviewer
>> >> >> and #2
>> >> >> >>>> >> > contributor with 28 commits for last 90 days [1][2].
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Fuelers, please vote with +1/-1 for
>> approval/objection.
>> >> >> Voting
>> >> >> >>>> will
>> >> >> >>>> >> > be open until July of 4th. This will go forward after
>> >> >> voting is
>> >> >> >>>> >> > closed if there are no objections.
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Overall contribution:
>> >> >> >>>> >> > [0] http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=mmalchuk
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Fuel library contribution for last 90 days:
>> >> >> >>>> >> > [1]
>> >> >> >>>> >> > <
>> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/fuel-library/90
>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/fuel-library/90
>> >> >> >>>> >> > http://stackalytics.com/report/users/mmalchuk
>> >> >> >>>> >> > List of reviews:
>> >> >> >>>> >> > [2]
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Maksim+Malchuk%22+status:merged,n,z
>> >> >> >>>> >> > --
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Best regards,
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Sergii Golovatiuk,
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Skype #golserge
>> >> >> >>>> >> > IRC #holser
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>>> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)
>> >> >> >>>> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >> --
>> >> >> >>>> >> Best regards,
>> >> >> >>>> >> Bogdan Dobrelya,
>> >> >> >>>> >> Irc #bogdando
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>>> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >>>> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >>>> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >>>> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >>> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> >> Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Adam Heczko
>> >> >> > Security Engineer @ Mirantis Inc.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/8cbfe82f/attachment-0001.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Message: 34
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 12:36:30 +0300
>> >> >> From: Denis Makogon <lildee1991 at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: Denis Makogon <lildee1991 at gmail.com>, "OpenStack Development
>> >> >> Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Python 3.4-3.5] Async python
>> >> >> clients
>> >> >> Message-ID:
>> >> >> <CALzSdtnQtzUNCjP+6u4GO=qNesD0q+KZPDZ7=
>> >> >> QmSGcrG7oqr9A at mail.gmail.com>
>> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2016-07-04 12:16 GMT+03:00 Julien Danjou <julien at danjou.info>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On Sun, Jun 26 2016, Denis Makogon wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > I know that some work in progress to bring Python 3.4
>> >> compatibility to
>> >> >> > > backend services and it is kinda hard question to answer, but
>> i'd
>> >> >> like to
>> >> >> > > know if there are any plans to support asynchronous HTTP API
>> >> client in
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > > nearest future using aiohttp [1] (PEP-3156)?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I don't think there is unfortunately. Most clients now relies on
>> >> >> > `requests', and unfortunately it's not async not it seems ready
>> to be
>> >> >> > last time I checked.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Unfortunately, it is what it is. So, i guess this is something that
>> is
>> >> >> worth considering discuss during summit and find the way and
>> capacity
>> >> to
>> >> >> support async HTTP API during next release. I'll start work on
>> general
>> >> >> concept that would satisfy both 2.7 and 3.4 or greater Python
>> versions.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What would be the best place to submit spec?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> > Julien Danjou
>> >> >> > // Free Software hacker
>> >> >> > // https://julien.danjou.info
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Kind regards,
>> >> >> Denys Makogon
>> >> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> >> URL: <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160704/e88a5547/attachment.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> End of OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 6
>> >> >> ********************************************
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Email:
>> >> shinobu at linux.com
>> >> shinobu at redhat.com
>> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> URL: <
>> >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160705/51fe3162/attachment.html
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> End of OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 9
>> >> ********************************************
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Email:
>> shinobu at linux.com
>> shinobu at redhat.com
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160706/b9b697ae/attachment.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> End of OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 12
>> *********************************************
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Email:
shinobu at linux.com
shinobu at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160710/8bb2465c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list