Could we add a discussion topic on the overall target Tacker Architecture? I have attached a slide which is my interpretation of a Tacker architecture which includes standalone Heat for orchestration and Tricycle for multi VIM management. If we can agree that an arch diagram such as the attached diagram represents the longer term view of the Tacker architecture, then I believe we can make more informed decisions about how to implement features for Mitaka. Bruce T From: Sridhar Ramaswamy <srics.r at gmail.com<mailto:srics.r at gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, January 22, 2016 at 7:09 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Reminder - Mid-cycle Meetup next week in San Jose, CA Heads up for folks interested in NFV Orchestration. Tacker team is hosting a mid-cycle meetup next week in San Jose. Agenda, logistics and sign-up sheet are in the etherpad [1]. - Sridhar [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tacker-mitaka-midcycle -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160128/91ee3a22/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Tacker Arch.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 481004 bytes Desc: Tacker Arch.pdf URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160128/91ee3a22/attachment-0001.pdf>