Open Stack

+1 from my side. I agree with this idea.

There is only one question from my side, which IMO we should  describe in
documentation:

Do we need to upload release-notes for such small features?
My guess is  - Yes. I'd like to know what other guys think about it.

On 20 January 2016 at 18:21, Rabi Mishra <ramishra at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> As discussed in the team meeting, below is the proposed spec-lite process
> for simple feature requests. This is already being used in Glance project.
> Feedback/comments/concerns are welcome, before we update the contributor
> docs with this:).
>
>
> tl;dr - spec-lite is a simple feature request created as a bug with enough
> details and with a `spec-lite` tag. Once triaged with status 'Triaged' and
> importance changed to 'Whishlist', it's approved. Status 'Won’t fix'
> signifies the request is rejected and 'Invalid' means it would require a
> full spec.
>
>
> Heat Spec Lite
> --------------
>
> Lite specs are small feature requests tracked as Launchpad bugs, with
> status 'Wishlist' and tagged with 'spec-lite' tag. These allow for
> submission and review of these feature requests before code is submitted.
>
> These can be used for simple features that don’t warrant a detailed spec
> to be proposed, evaluated, and worked on. The team evaluates these requests
> as it evaluates specs. Once a bug has been approved as a Request for
> Enhancement (RFE), it’ll be targeted for a release.
>
>
> The workflow for the life of a spec-lite in Launchpad is as follows:
>
> 1. File a bug with a small summary of what the request change is and tag
> it as spec-lite.
> 2. The bug is triaged and importance changed to Wishlist.
> 3. The bug is evaluated and marked as Triaged to announce approval or to
> Won’t fix to announce rejection or Invalid to request a full spec.
> 4. The bug is moved to In Progress once the code is up and ready to review.
> 5. The bug is moved to Fix Committed once the patch lands.
>
> In summary the states are:
>
> New:            This is where spec-lite starts, as filed by the community.
> Triaged:        Drivers - Move to this state to mean, “you can start
> working on it”
> Won’t Fix:      Drivers - Move to this state to reject a lite-spec.
> Invalid:        Drivers - Move to this state to request a full spec for
> this request
>
> Lite spec Submission Guidelines
> -------------------------------
>
> When a bug is submitted, there are two fields that must be filled:
> ‘summary’ and ‘further information’. The ‘summary’ must be brief enough to
> fit in one line.
>
> The ‘further information’ section must be a description of what you would
> like to see implemented in heat. The description should provide enough
> details for a knowledgeable developer to understand what is the existing
> problem and what’s the proposed solution.
>
> Add spec-lite tag to the bug.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Rabi
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Regards,
Sergey.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160125/d610cd5b/attachment.html>