Open Stack

+1 for defaulting to upstream for CI. If we have a strong case where we
need to make a patch in order to make unit tests pass, we could switch a
module back to review.fuel-infra.org/puppet-modules/.... with a FIXME and a
LP bug ID so we can switch it back quickly once the upstream issue is
resolved.  As far as I know, we don't have to worry about that scenario.

-Matthew

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobrelia at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> Another point is to use upstream links for modules w/o downstream patches.
> I noticed we *always* put it to the deployment/Puppetfile [0] as
>  "https://review.fuel-infra.org/puppet-modules/...". Why should we?
> Let's just do the best to reuse upstream modules as is, eventually.
>
> [0]
> https://github.com/openstack/fuel-library/blob/master/deployment/Puppetfile
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan Dobrelya.
> Irc #bogdando
>
> 2016-01-21 11:09 GMT+01:00 Bartlomiej Piotrowski <bpiotrowski at mirantis.com
> >:
>
>> Let's drop 3.3 as well. 3.4 is oldschool enough for vintage lovers.
>>
>> BP
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Aleksandr Didenko <
>> adidenko at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > I also think 3.3 is the version that ships with 14.04.
>>>
>>> 3.4.3 is shipped with Ubuntu-14.04. I think 3.4, 3.8 and 4 should be
>>> enough.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk <
>>> sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for 3.3, 3.4, 3.8 and 4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Sergii Golovatiuk,
>>>> Skype #golserge
>>>> IRC #holser
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Alex Schultz <aschultz at mirantis.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Matthew Mosesohn
>>>>> <mmosesohn at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi all,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Unit tests on CI and gate bottleneck are really slowing down commit
>>>>> > progress. We recently had a meeting to discuss possible ways to
>>>>> improve
>>>>> > this, including symlinks, caching git repositories, etc, but one
>>>>> thing we
>>>>> > can do much faster is to simply disable 3.3-3.7 puppet jobs. We
>>>>> don't deploy
>>>>> > Fuel 9.0 (or 8.0) on earlier Puppet versions, so what value is there
>>>>> to the
>>>>> > checks? I propose we remove these tests, and hopefully we will see
>>>>> some
>>>>> > immediate relief.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> How about we reduce to 3.3, 3.4, 3.8 and 4?  We would remove  3.6 and
>>>>> 3.7 which would reduce the number of jobs by a third  The goal of
>>>>> keeping the others was to ensure that if/when we are able to install
>>>>> fuel-library without our version of puppet that a user could use
>>>>> whatever version their environment has. There were some changes
>>>>> between 3.3 and 3.4 (if I remember correctly) so we should keep
>>>>> checking that as it's also the oldest version supported by the
>>>>> upstream puppet openstack modules.  I also think 3.3 is the version
>>>>> that ships with 14.04.  Additionally we used 3.4 in fuel 7 and below
>>>>> so we should keep those around.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>>> > Matthew Mosesohn
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> > Unsubscribe:
>>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160122/1bab6be9/attachment.html>