[openstack-dev] [keystone][neutron][requirements] - keystonemiddleware-4.1.0 performance regression
Sean Dague
sean at dague.net
Wed Jan 20 20:15:01 UTC 2016
On 01/20/2016 02:59 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> So this was due to a change in keystonemiddleware. We stopped doing
> in-memory caching of tokens per process, per worker by default [1].
> There are a couple of reasons:
>
> 1) in-memory caching produced unreliable validation because some
> processed may have a cache, some may not
> 2) in-memory caching was unbounded memory wise per worker.
>
> I'll spin up a devstack change to enable memcache and use the memcache
> caching for keystonemiddleware today. This will benefit things in a
> couple ways
>
> * All services and all service's workers will share the offload of the
> validation, likely producing a real speedup even over the old in-memory
> caching
> * There will no longer be inconsistent validation offload/responses
> based upon which worker you happen to hit for a given service.
>
> I'll post to the ML here with the proposed change later today.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/openstack/keystonemiddleware/commit/f27d7f776e8556d976f75d07c99373455106de52
This seems like a pretty substantial performance impact. Was there a
reno associated with this?
I think that we should still probably:
* != the keystone middleware version, it's impacting the ability to land
fixes in the gate
* add devstack memcache code
* find some way to WARN if we are running without memcache config, so
people realize they are in a regressed state
* add back keystone middleware at that version
-Sean
>
> Cheers,
> --Morgan
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com
> <mailto:armamig at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19 January 2016 at 22:46, Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com
> <mailto:blak111 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We noticed a major jump in the neutron tempest and API test run
> times recently in Neutron. After digging through logstash I
> found out that it first occurred on the requirements bump here:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265697/
>
> After locally testing each requirements change individually, I
> found that the keystonemiddleware change seems to be the
> culprit. It almost doubles the time it takes to fulfill simple
> port-list requests in Neutron.
>
> Armando pushed up a patch here to
> confirm: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270024/
> Once that's verified, we should probably put a cap on the
> middleware because it's causing the tests to run up close to
> their time limits.
>
>
> Kevin,
>
> As usual your analytical skills are to be praised.
>
> I wonder if anyone else is aware of the issue/s, because during the
> usual hunting I could see other projects being affected and showing
> abnormally high run times of the dsvm jobs.
>
> I am not sure that [1] is the right approach, but it should give us
> some data points if executed successfully.
>
> Cheers,
> Armando
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270024/
>
>
> --
> Kevin Benton
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list