Open Stack

On 20 January 2016 at 08:20, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:

> Just providing support for Kyle’s proposal!
> It is working very well for other teams such as nova, docs between others.
>

At risk of stating the obvious, not every project is equal, and as I
mentioned in an earlier response, I have always been skeptical of the
double schedule because a) numbers haven't proven the overwhelming
attendance and b) the agenda is set on a weekly basis and certain topics
are only discussed during one of the meetings.

That said, I welcome anyone willing to step up and co-chair the Tuesday
meetings. Feel free to post a patch on irc-meetings and I'd be happy to
bless it.

Cheers,
Armando


> Edgar
>
>
>
>
> On 1/20/16, 3:55 AM, "Rossella Sblendido" <rsblendido at suse.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On 01/19/2016 05:14 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> >> Rossella Sblendido <rsblendido at suse.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
> >>>> Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet.
> >>>>
> >>>> But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in a EU/ASIA
> >>>> friendlier
> >>>> timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with different chairs.
> >>>>
> >>>> We don't impose unnatural-working hours (too early, too late for
> >>>> family, etc..)
> >>>> to anyone, we encourage gathering as a community (may be split by
> >>>> timezones, but
> >>>> it feels more human and faster than ML conversations..) and also
> >>>> people able
> >>>> to make to both, could serve as bridges for both meetings.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> I think that is what Kyle was proposing and if I am not wrong that's
> >>> what they do in nova.
> >>
> >> My understanding is that Kyle proposed to switch back to bi-weekly
> >> alternating meetings, and have a separate chair for each.
> >
> >You are right Ihar, I misread. I like Kyle's proposal better too.
> >
> >Rossella
> >
> >>
> >> I think Kyle’s suggestion is wiser since it won’t leave the community
> >> split into two separate parts, and it won’t waste two hours each week
> >> where we could make it with just one.
> >>
> >> Ihar
> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >__________________________________________________________________________
> >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160120/51e46712/attachment.html>