[openstack-dev] Shovel (RackHD/OpenStack)

Heck, Joseph Joseph.Heck at emc.com
Sat Jan 16 02:36:05 UTC 2016

Thanks for the links Jeremy! I'm still reading through what exactly "bigtent" means, not sure I grok the placement for littler/ancillary things like this effort, but the the links are hugely helpful!

- joe
From: Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org<mailto:fungi at yuggoth.org>>
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Shovel (RackHD/OpenStack)
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>

On 2016-01-15 18:44:42 +0000 (+0000), Heck, Joseph wrote:
> I haven’t been following the community and the norms closely for a couple
> years - Stackforge appears to have dissipated in favor of projects in
> incubation to share things like this. Is that accurate?

The idea of "incubating" before becoming an official project
basically went away with the advent of the "Big Tent"[1]. Also the
_term_ "StackForge" isn't dead (yet[2] anyway), but we have
unofficial^WStackForge repos just share the same Git repository
namespace[3] with official ones now for ease of management and to
reduce the amount of disruptive renaming we used to have to
accommodate moving between namespaces.

[1] http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141202-project-structure-reform-spec.html
[2] https://review.openstack.org/265352
[3] http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20150615-stackforge-retirement.html
Jeremy Stanley

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160116/cd7b9235/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list