Open Stack

IIRC some of them were already marked (via a comment) as deprecated.

+1 to cleaning up the parameters. I think it should be done as soon as
possible, as the existence of some of them makes the usage of the templates
quite confusing.

BR

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Steven Hardy <shardy at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've noticed that we have a fairly large number of unused parameters in
> t-h-t, some of which are marked deprecated, some aren't.
>
> Since we moved tripleoclient to use parameter_defaults everywhere, I think
> it should be safe to remove these unused parameters, even in
> overcloud.yaml.
>
> See:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/227057/
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/227057/
>
> Since those, we can pass removed/deprecated parameters from the client and
> they will be ignored, even if they're removed from the template (unlike if
> you use "parameters", where a validation error would occur.
>
> I'd like to go ahead and clean these up (only on the master branch), is
> that reasonable?  We can document the change via a mitaka release note?
>
> Ideally, we'd have user-visible warnings for a deprecation period, but
> there's no way to output such warnings atm via heat, so we'd need to wire
> them in via tripleoclient or tripleo-common, which seems a bit backwards
> given that we can just remove the parameters there instead.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Steve
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosorior at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160113/7bf6e2a1/attachment.html>