Open Stack

Doug Wiegley <dougwig at parksidesoftware.com> wrote:

> I don’t think it ninja merged. It had plenty of reviews, and was open  
> during international hours. I don’t have any issue there.
>

I merely meant it was merged too quick. I did not know some people feel the  
'ninja merge’ term has negative flavor.

What’s your definition of international hours? The patch was proposed at  
10pm my time and merged early in the morning (7am). Believe it or not, I am  
not expected to be present during this time. It was a coincidence that I  
did (or maybe, my bad habit of staying late).

> I don’t like the crazy early meeting, so I set out to prove it didn’t  
> matter:
>
> Average attendance before rotating: 20.7 people
> Average attendance on Monday afternoons (U.S. time): 20.9
> Average attendance on Tuesday morning (U.S. time): 23.7
>
> Stupid data, that’s not what I wanted to see.
>

I feel for you.

> I haven’t yet correlated people to which meeting time yet, but attendance  
> was slightly up during the crazy early hated time, across the 1.25 years  
> it was running (started 9/9/14). This is just people saying something;  
> lurkers can just read the logs.
>
> Data is from eavesdrop meeting logs, if anyone else wants to crunch it.
>
> Thanks,
> doug
>
>
>> On Jan 12, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 01:27:30PM +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>> Agreed with Gary on behalf of my European compatriots. (Note that I
>>> *personally* +1’d the patch because I don’t mind, doing late hours  
>>> anyway;
>>> but it’s sad it was ninja merged without giving any chance for those from
>>> affected timezones to express their concerns).
>>
>> So Ninja merged has a negative connotation that I refute.
>>
>> I merged it.  It was judgment error, and I apologise for that.
>>
>> * I found and read through the list thread.
>> * Saw only +1's yours included
>>    - known you'd be affected I used your +1 as a barometer
>>
>> My mistake was not noticing your request to leave the review open for  
>> longer.
>>
>> I also noted in my review that reverting it is pretty low cost to back  
>> it out
>> if needed.
>>
>> I understand that the 'root cause' for this change was the yaml2ical  
>> issue that
>> stemmed from having 2 odd week in a row.  We've fixed that [1]. I'm also
>> working a a more human concept of biweekly meeting in yaml2ical.
>>
>> Tony
>> [1] the next time it could have been a problem is 2020/2021 ;P
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev