[openstack-dev] [doc] DocImpact vs. reno
tom at openstack.org
Sat Jan 9 04:07:11 UTC 2016
On 08/01/16 21:15, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 01/07/2016 06:21 PM, Lana Brindley wrote:
>>> On 7 Jan 2016, at 2:09 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2016 09:02 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>>>> On 2016-01-06 07:52:48 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote:
>>>>> I think auto openning against a project, and shuffling it to
>>>>> manuals manually (with details added by humans) would be fine.
>>>>> It's not clear to me why a new job was required for that.
>>>> The new check job was simply a requirement of the Docs team, since
>>>> they were having trouble triaging auto-generated bugs they were
>>>> receiving and wanted to enforce the inclusion of some expository
>>> Sure, but if that triage is put back on the Nova team, that seems fine.
>> So you’re thinking we should make all docimpact bugs go to the project bug queue? Even for defcore?
> Yes, because then it would be the responsibility of the project team to
> ensure there is enough info before passing it onto the docs team.
>>> It also doesn't make sense to me there would be a DocImpact change that
>>> wouldn't also have a reno section. The reason someone thinks that a
>>> change needs reflection in the manual is that it adds/removes/changes a
>>> feature that would also show up in release notes. Perhaps my imagination
>>> isn't sufficient to come up with a scenario where DocImpact is valid,
>>> but we wouldn't have content in one of those sections.
>> I can think of plenty. What about where a command is changed slightly? Or an output is formatted differently? Or where flags have been removed, or default values changed, or ….
> Nearly all of those changes have been triggering release notes at this
> point. They are all changes the user needs to adapt to because they
> potentially impact compatibility.
Would love it to be the case, but I don't think that's correct. Or if
it's supposed to be correct, it hasn't been well communicated :)
Few random reviews from the DocImpact queue that didn't have relnotes:
Didn't really look closely into these - would encourage someone with a
bit more time to do so, but the fact that these were so trivial to eke
out means that "nearly all" is almost certainly a bad assumption.
>> Bugs and relnotes are two very different things.
>> Lana Brindley
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
More information about the OpenStack-dev