Open Stack

#2 makes more sense.

Ghe Rivero

Quoting Flavio Percoco (2016-01-08 14:06:28)
> Greetings,
>
> As some of you know already, google code is going to be shutdown. Some
> projects we're using are hosted and, unfortunately, some of them are
> unmaintained and perhaps going away.
>
> One of these projects is PrettyTable. This point was raised by Erno in
> this patch[0] from jd__. PrettyTable is not just being used in several
> openstack specific projects but it's also a transitive dependency for
> all client libraries using cliff.
>
> With all that in mind, I've contacted the author of the library and
> asked him if it'd be ok for us (OpenStack) to adopt this library. The
> author accepted and granted me access to the project on pypi.
>
> I'm saying all the above because we now need to find a home for it in
> OpenStack.
>
> I've identified 2 possible places:
>
> 1) Oslo, as we maintaing cross-project libraries and some of them are
> not in the oslo namespace
>
> 2) OpenStack Client team as they maintain cliff already and it'd
> perhaps make more sense to have this library there.
>
> One thing to note is that this library has been quite stable, which
> means it won't, hopefully, add too much work to the team.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234340/
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev