Open Stack

Hi Dmitry,

The thing is it may not require changes in Fuel for 10.0 too, ideally we
would like to add a couple of new gates to OpenStack infra, so they will be
enabled for external extensions when there are any.

Thanks,

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko <dborodaenko at mirantis.com
> wrote:

> If the spec is not going to require code changes in 9.0/Mitaka, why not
> simply target it for 10.0/Newton?
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:21:55PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a spec where we are trying to do research and describe how we are
> > going to test extensions [0], we will not be able to land it before
> feature
> > freeze, so should we get feature freeze exception for it? Or it will not
> be
> > a problem to merge it even after FF?
> >
> > The spec itself is more about the process which we are going to follow
> > during extensions development, so there should be no changes for current
> > projects.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281749/
>
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160226/f4f56a75/attachment.html>