Open Stack

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.komawar at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Can we make it ? :
>
> FB 3
> W 6
> C 2
>
>

Could you elaborate on why you think we need 6 workroom sessions?

Back in Tokyo, 5 seemed more than enough and there will be more projects to
host in Austin.

Cheers,
Flavio


>
> On 2/24/16 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with regards
> to slots and sessions are for the next summit.
>
> We can choose among 3 different types of sessions:
>
> * Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu)
> Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style, with
> advertised session content on the summit schedule for increased external
> participation. Ideal for when wider feedback is essential.
>
> * Workroom slots (Tue-Thu)
> Smaller rooms organized in boardroom style, with topic buried in the
> session description, in an effort to limit attendance and not overcrowd
> the room. Ideal to get work done and prioritize work in small teams.
>
> * Contributors meetup (Fri)
> Half-day session(s) on the Friday to get into the Newton action while
> decisions and plans are still hot, or to finish discussions started
> during the week, whatever works for you.
>
> Our usage in Tokyo was: 3, 5, 2
>
> I'd recommend we keep it that way. Thoughts?
> Cheers,
> Flavio
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Nikhil
>
>


-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160224/f1dd6706/attachment.html>