[openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome
Douglas Mendizábal
douglas.mendizabal at rackspace.com
Mon Feb 15 18:24:06 UTC 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
I had not previously heard of pycryptodome. Is this supposed to be a
drop-in replacement for pycrypto? If so then it sounds like they're
doing a terrible job of it.
The plan for Barbican has been to wait for pyca/cryptography [1] to
add support for the apis we needed to be able to drop our pycrypto
dependency. I'll have to double check the latest pyca/cryptography
notes, but I do believe it's at a point now where it can be used in
Barbican to replace pycrypto. This would be the preferred fix for us.
AFAIK the paramiko folks were going to adopt pyca/cryptography as
well, so it appears that pycryptodome support will not be merged
there either. [2]
Additionaly, bespoke pure-python cryptography gives me the heebie
jeebies, so I would strongly recommend to move all cryptographic work
to use pyca/cryptography instead of pycryptodome.
- - Douglas Mendizábal
[1] https://cryptography.io/en/latest/
[2] https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/pull/646
On 2/15/16 6:44 AM, Haïkel wrote:
> 2016-02-14 23:16 GMT+01:00 Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Short Story: pycryptodome if installed inadvertently will break
>> several projects: Example :
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279926/
>>
>> Long Story: There's a new kid in town pycryptodome:
>> https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome
>>
>> Because pycrypto itself has not been maintained for a while:
>> https://github.com/dlitz/pycrypto
>>
>> So folks like pysaml2 and paramiko are trying to switch over:
>> https://github.com/rohe/pysaml2/commit/0e4f5fa48b1965b269f69bd383bbfb
de6b41ac63
>>
>>
>>
>>
https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/issues/637
>>
>> In fact pysaml2===4.0.3 has already switched over. So the
>> requirements bot/script has been trying to alert us to this new
>> dependency, you can see Nova fail.
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279926/
>>
>> Why does it fail? For example, the new library is strict about
>> getting bytes for keys and has dropped some parameters in
>> methods. for example:
>> https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome/blob/master/lib/Crypto/Publ
icKey/RSA.py#L405
>>
>>
>>
>>
https://github.com/dlitz/pycrypto/blob/master/lib/Crypto/PublicKey/RSA.p
y#L499
>>
>> Another problem, if pycrypto gets installed last then things
>> will work, if it pycryptodome gets installed last, things will
>> fail. So we definitely cannot allow both in our
>> global-requirements and upper-constraints. We can always try to
>> pin stuff, but things will fail as there are a lot of jobs that
>> do not honor upper-constraints. And things will fail in the field
>> for Mitaka.
>>
>> Action: So what can we do? One possibility is to pin requirements
>> and hope for the best. Another is to tolerate the install of
>> either pycrypto or pycryptodome and test both combinations so we
>> don't have to fight this battle.
>>
>> Example for Nova : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279909/
>> Example for Glance : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280008/
>> Example for Barbican : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280014/
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Thanks, Dims
>>
>
> This is annoying from a packaging PoV.
>
> We have dependencies relying on pycrypto (e.g oauthlib used by
> keystone, paramiko by even more projects), and we can't control
> the order of installation. My 2 cts will be to favor the latter
> solution and test both combinations until N or O releases (and then
> get rid of pycrypto definitively), so we can handle this
> gracefully.
>
>
> Regards, H.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
____
>
>
>
>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=t6oe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list