[openstack-dev] [nova] A prototype implementation towards the "shared state scheduler"

Ed Leafe ed at leafe.com
Mon Feb 15 14:02:02 UTC 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 02/15/2016 03:27 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:

> - can we have the feature optional for operators

One thing that concerns me is the lesson learned from simply having a
compute node's instance information sent and persisted in memory. That
was resisted by several large operators, due to overhead. This
proposal will have to store that and more in memory.

- -- 

- -- Ed Leafe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=sxd3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list