Open Stack

On Feb 12, 2016 11:06 PM, "Spencer Krum" <nibz at spencerkrum.com> wrote:
>
> The module would also be welcome under the voxpupuli[0] namespace on
> github. We currently have a puppet-corosync[1] module, and there is some
> overlap there, but a pure pacemaker module would be a welcome addition.
>
> I'm not sure which I would prefer, just that VP is an option. For
> greater openstack integration, gerrit is the way to go. For greater
> participation from the wider puppet community, github is the way to go.
> Voxpupuli provides testing and releasing infrastructure.

The thing is, we might want to gate it on tripleo since it's the first
consumer right now. Though I agree VP would be a good place too, to attract
more puppet users.

Dilemma!
Maybe we could start using VP, with good testing and see how it works.

Iterate later if needed. Thoughts?

>
> [0] https://voxpupuli.org/
> [1] https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-corosync
>
> --
>   Spencer Krum
>   nibz at spencerkrum.com
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, at 09:44 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > Please look and vote:
> > https://review.openstack.org/279698
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback!
> >
> > On 02/10/2016 04:04 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote:
> > > I like the idea of moving it to use the OpenStack infrastructure.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com
> > > <mailto:openstack at nemebean.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >     On 02/09/2016 08:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > >     > Hi,
> > >     >
> > >     > TripleO is currently using puppet-pacemaker [1] which is a
module
> > >     hosted
> > >     > & managed by Github.
> > >     > The module was created and mainly maintained by Redhat. It
tends to
> > >     > break TripleO quite often since we don't have any gate.
> > >     >
> > >     > I propose to move the module to OpenStack so we'll use
OpenStack Infra
> > >     > benefits (Gerrit, Releases, Gating, etc). Another idea would be
to
> > >     gate
> > >     > the module with TripleO HA jobs.
> > >     >
> > >     > The question is, under which umbrella put the module? Puppet ?
> > >     TripleO ?
> > >     >
> > >     > Or no umbrella, like puppet-ceph. <-- I like this idea
> > >
> > >
> > > I think the module not being under an umbrella makes sense.
> > >
> > >
> > >     >
> > >     > Any feedback is welcome,
> > >     >
> > >     > [1] https://github.com/redhat-openstack/puppet-pacemaker
> > >
> > >     Seems like a module that would be useful outside of TripleO, so it
> > >     doesn't seem like it should live under that.  Other than that I
don't
> > >     have enough knowledge of the organization of the puppet modules to
> > >     comment.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
 __________________________________________________________________________
> > >     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > >     Unsubscribe:
> > >     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > >     <
http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> > >     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Juan Antonio Osorio R.
> > > e-mail: jaosorior at gmail.com <mailto:jaosorior at gmail.com>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
__________________________________________________________________________
> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > Unsubscribe:
OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Emilien Macchi
> >
> >
__________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > Email had 1 attachment:
> > + signature.asc
> >   1k (application/pgp-signature)
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160213/0427c5d0/attachment.html>