[openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

Monty Taylor mordred at inaugust.com
Sat Feb 13 01:28:43 UTC 2016

On 02/12/2016 06:40 PM, John Griffith wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net
> <mailto:sean at dague.net>> wrote:
>     Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to
>     get resolution here.
>     OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As
>     someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm not even sure which one
>     we are supposed to be transitioning from -> to.
>     At a minimum I'd like to make all of devstack use 1 term, which is the
>     term we're trying to get to. That will help move the needle.
>     However, again, I'm not sure which one that is supposed to be (comments
>     in various places show movement in both directions). So people with
>     deeper knowledge here, can you speak up as to which is the deprecated
>     term and which is the term moving forward.
>              -Sean
>     --
>     Sean Dague
>     http://dague.net
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> ​I honestly don't have any real feeling about one over the other; BUT I
> applaud the fact that somebody was brave enough to raise the question again.
> Sounds like Project is where we're supposed to be, so if we can get it
> in Keystone we can all go work on updating it once and for all?​

Tis all good in keystone. If you're using keystoneauth and keystone v3 
everything will work magically. However, there are still some steps 
locally for things like config files and whatnot.

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list