Open Stack

> On Feb 5, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>> On "production-grade":
>> 
>> I'd be (strongly) in favor of defining a target deployment configuration and size which we find representative of the minimum bar for "production-grade." Anything less concrete and specific becomes more nuisance than help. I'd hope that specs might look like the following:
>> 
>> - tests must be run against an OpenStack-certified cloud containing at minimum 20 compute nodes, 1 TB block storage, 1 TB object storage
>> - tests must demonstrate service responsiveness, stability, and reliability while VMs, compute volumes, object store objects, and networks are created/destroyed at a rate of 50/second in any combination while maintaining 99.9%+ service availability, <1% error rate, and response latency of <100ms  
>> - tests must demonstrate service resiliency when faced with common component failures such as: compute node failure, storage failure, network failure, etc.
> 
> 
> The scale could be defined on the basis of the survey data. The reference implementation should be able to address at least X% of deployments. I can think of at least one project which was not suitable for use at a reasonable size configuration and not being able to demonstrate this would have saved a lot of grief in the ops community as well as ensuring the project addressed the issue early.

+1 and I can think of more than one. =\

—j

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160205/90481bb2/attachment.html>