[openstack-dev] [all] [tc] "No Open Core" in 2016

Mike Perez thingee at gmail.com
Fri Feb 5 19:27:05 UTC 2016

On 12:27 Feb 05, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
> wrote:
> > So, is Poppy "open core"?
> >
> It doesn't follow the 'spirit' of open core, but it does have some of the
> characteristics, in that the open code is not all that useful, or maybe
> even testable, without the commercial component(s) (at this time).
> So while Poppy may not fully qualify for the open core label, it still
> fails some of the tests that we want to see, such as a usable open source
> implementation.

>From a QA perspective in gate, if we have to rely on a commercial solution
(even if donated) to test it, then that's bad.

Mike Perez

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list