Open Stack

On 02/05/2016 10:36 AM, Neil Jerram wrote:
> As some others have said, I see the current discussion as being about
> the chain of accountability, from a stadium project, through Neutron, up
> to the OpenStack TC and board.  IIUC, Armando and other cores feel that
> there is a gap there - because they can't reasonably understand and
> vouch for all the stadium projects to the same standard they can for
> core Neutron.  Plus it seems (from the current
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275888/9 text) that there is a desire
> for strong core team overlap between openstack/neutron and all Neutron
> stadium projects.
> 
> As the lead of networking-calico, I think it's a reasonable call to say
> that networking-calico (and similar projects) should therefore be
> OpenStack big tent projects, rather than Neutron stadium, and hence the
> reviews I've just left.

Thanks, Neil.  You've summarized this well.  A more clear and accurate
chain of accountability is indeed what we're trying to get to here.

-- 
Russell Bryant