[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept
gal.sagie at gmail.com
Thu Feb 4 07:33:35 UTC 2016
As i have commented on the patch i will also send this to the mailing list:
I really dont see why Dragonflow is not part of this list, given the
criteria you listed.
Dragonflow is fully developed under Neutron/OpenStack, no other
repositories. It is fully Open source and already have a community of
people contributing and interest from various different companies and
OpenStack deployers. (I can prepare the list of active contributions and of
interested parties) It also puts OpenStack Neutron APIs and use cases as
first class citizens and working on being an integral part of OpenStack.
I agree that OVN needs to be part of the list, but you brought up this
criteria in regards to ODL, so: OVN like ODL is not only Neutron and
OpenStack and is even running/being implemented on a whole different
governance model and requirements to it.
I think you also forgot to mention some other projects as well that are
fully open source with a vibrant and diverse community, i will let them
comment here by themselves.
Frankly this approach disappoints me, I have honestly worked hard to make
Dragonflow fully visible and add and support open discussion and follow the
correct guidelines to work in a project. I think that Dragonflow community
has already few members from various companies and this is only going to
grow in the near future. (in addition to deployers that are considering it
as a solution) we also welcome anyone that wants to join and be part of
the process to step in, we are very welcoming
I also think that the correct way to do this is to actually add as
reviewers all lieutenants of the projects you are now removing from Neutron
big stadium and letting them comment.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/30/2015 07:56 PM, Armando M. wrote:
> > I would like to suggest that we evolve the structure of the Neutron
> > governance, so that most of the deliverables that are now part of the
> > Neutron stadium become standalone projects that are entirely
> > self-governed (they have their own core/release teams, etc).
> After thinking over the discussion in this thread for a while, I have
> started the following proposal to implement the stadium renovation that
> Armando originally proposed in this thread.
> Russell Bryant
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Best Regards ,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev