Open Stack

As long as configurations for 2.2 and 2.0 are compatible we shouldn't have
an issue I wouldn't think. I just don't know enough about etcd deployment
to be sure about that.

If we want to quickly improve the gate, I can patch the problematic areas
in the templates and then we can make a blueprint for upgrading to Atomic
23.

Corey

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:47 PM Vilobh Meshram <
vilobhmeshram.openstack at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Corey,
>
> This is slowing down our merge rate and needs to be fixed IMHO.
>
> What risk are you talking about when using newer version of etcd ? Is it
> documented somewhere for the team to have a look ?
>
> -Vilobh
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Corey O'Brien <coreypobrien at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey team,
>>
>> I've been looking into https://bugs.launchpad.net/magnum/+bug/1541105 which
>> covers a bug with etcdctl, and I wanted opinions on how best to fix it.
>>
>> Should we update the image to include the latest version of etcd? Or,
>> should we temporarily install the latest version as a part of notify-heat
>> (see bug for patch)?
>>
>> I'm personally in favor of updating the image, but there is presumably
>> some small risk with using a newer version of etcd.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Corey O'Brien
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160203/b7c1240b/attachment.html>