Open Stack

Le 20/12/2016 10:20, Chris Dent a écrit :
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> 
>> Before moving forward and picking yet another port that could trample
>> another service, I'd rather prefer first that Senlin jobs would
>> temporarely disable the placement-* services so that the gate would be
>> happy, while in the same time we try to identify a free port number that
>> the placement API can safely bind.
> 
> Another option here may be to not have the placement api bind to two
> ports. The current set up binds 8778 with the API at /, but what's
> registered in the service catalog is port 80 with the API at
> /placement.
> 
> So perhaps only use the http://1.2.3.4/placement and disable the
> virtualhost that listens on 8778?
> 
> I'd experiment with this myself but I'm going to be away from a
> compute all day. If people think it is a good idea but nobody has a
> chance to do it today I'll look into it tomorrow.
> 

Oh good catch. Since we register the service catalog with port 80, then
there is no reason to consume an application port.
Chris, don't worry, I'll play with that today.

-Sylvain


> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>