Open Stack

Hi zengchen,

Yeah, the constraint looks incorrect. Not sure if we got it wrong or manila
has changed it afterwards. It would be good raise a bug/propose a fix.


On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:26 AM, zengchen <chenzeng765 at 163.com> wrote:

> Hi, Heat stackers:
>     May I ask a question about creating Manila Share. I see Heat define
> some constraints
>  for property schema 'ACCESS_TYPE' at
>  heat.engine.resources.openstack.manila.share.properties_schema[ACCESS_
> RULES].
>  I copy the codes as bellow. The allowed values for 'ACCESS_TYPE' are  'ip',
> 'domain'.
>
>             ACCESS_TYPE: properties.Schema(
>                 properties.Schema.STRING,
>                 _('Type of access that should be provided to guest.'),
>                 constraints=[constraints.AllowedValues(
>                     ['ip', 'domain'])],
>                 required=True
>             ),
>
> However, I see manila has defined different allowed value for 'ACCESS_TYPE', which
>
>  includes 'ip', 'user', 'cert', 'cephx'. So, my question is does heat need some updates? Or
>
> do I miss something?  Hope for your reply. Thanks very much!
>
>
> cheers
>
> zengchen
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Rabi Misra
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161209/a9c06d6a/attachment.html>