[openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of Zun core membership

Pradeep Singh ps4openstack at gmail.com
Fri Dec 9 04:05:16 UTC 2016


Thanks Hongbin and Zun Team,

I will try my best to meet Zun team's expectations.

Thanks,
Pradeep Singh

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin.lu at huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. This proposal was approved. Pradeep has been
> added to the core team.
>
> Best regards,
> Hongbin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sudipta Biswas [mailto:sbiswas7 at linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> > Sent: December-04-16 11:29 PM
> > To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of Zun core
> > membership
> >
> > +1 for both, Welcome Pradeep!
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Sudipto
> >
> >
> > On 05/12/16 6:02 AM, Wenzhi Yu wrote:
> > > +1, welcome Pradeep!
> > >
> > >> 在 2016年12月4日,下午10:49,Qiming Teng
> > <tengqim at linux.vnet.ibm.com> 写道:
> > >>
> > >> +1 to both.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:37:59PM +0000, Hongbin Lu wrote:
> > >>> Hi Zun cores,
> > >>>
> > >>> I am going to propose the following change of the Zun core
> > reviewers team:
> > >>> + Pradeep Kumar Singh (pradeep-singh-u)
> > >>> - Vivek Jain (vivek-jain-openstack)
> > >>>
> > >>> Pradeep was proven to be a significant contributor to Zun. He
> > ranked first at the number of commits, and his patches were non-trivial
> > and with high quality. His reviews were also very helpful, and often
> > prompted us to re-think the design. It would be great to have him in
> > the core team. I would like to thank Vivek for his interest to join the
> > core team when Zun was found. However, he became inactive in the past a
> > few months, but he is welcomed to re-join the core team as long as he
> > becomes active again.
> > >>>
> > >>> According to the OpenStack Governance process [1], we require a
> > minimum of 4 +1 votes from Zun core reviewers within a 1 week voting
> > window (consider this proposal as a +1 vote from me). A vote of -1 is a
> > veto. If we cannot get enough votes or there is a veto vote prior to
> > the end of the voting window, this proposal is rejected.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > >>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/CoreDevProcess
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>> Hongbin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > >> _____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > >> Unsubscribe:
> > >> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > > ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > Unsubscribe:
> > > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > ___
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
> > request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161209/c6b99f62/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list