[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dynamic Routing] Plans for scenario testing?

Tidwell, Ryan ryan.tidwell at hpe.com
Wed Dec 7 01:49:46 UTC 2016


I just saw this review [1] come in this afternoon. I'm starting to review and digest it, but it looks pretty slick. It looks like Ryu may have some test helpers that stand up Quagga in a container and allow you to interact with it natively in python. This gives us a clean way to set up a BGP peer that we can run assertions against to ensure neutron announces the correct routes. I see what looks like some decent scenario tests here. So it looks like we do have work in flight to address some test gaps in neutron-dynamic-routing.


-Ryan


[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/407779

________________________________
From: Tidwell, Ryan
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 3:13:17 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dynamic Routing] Plans for scenario testing?

Thanks for the pointer. I'll take a look and see what can be leveraged.

-Ryan


_____________________________
From: Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com<mailto:armamig at gmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dynamic Routing] Plans for scenario testing?
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>




On 6 December 2016 at 14:44, Tidwell, Ryan <ryan.tidwell at hpe.com<mailto:ryan.tidwell at hpe.com>> wrote:
This is at the top of my list to look at. I've been thinking a lot about how to implement some tests. For instance, do we need to actually stand up a BGP peer of some sort to peer neutron with and assert the announcements somehow? Or should we assume that Ryu works properly and make sure we have solid coverage of the driver interface somehow. I'm open to suggestions as to how to approach this.

Thomas Morin et al have had a few ideas and put together [1]. There are some similarities between the efforts. Something worth mulling over on.

Cheers,
Armando

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396967/


-Ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: Assaf Muller [mailto:assaf at redhat.com<mailto:assaf at redhat.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 2:36 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dynamic Routing] Plans for scenario testing?

Hi all,

General query - Is there anyone in the Dynamic Routing community that is planning on contributing a scenario test? As far as I could tell, none of the current API tests would fail if, for example, the BGP agent was not running. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Thank you.

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161207/a84b8cf5/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list