On 2016-12-05 20:45:08 +0000 (+0000), Kendall Nelson wrote: [...] > Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers [10] > - > Option 1: https://review.openstack.org/403834 - Proprietary driver dev > is unlevel > - > Option 2: https://review.openstack.org/403836 - Driver development can > be level > - > Option 3: https://review.openstack.org/403839 - Level playing fields, > except drivers > - > Option 4: https://review.openstack.org/403829 > <https://review.openstack.org/403829> - establish a new "driver team" > concept > - > Thierry prefers this option > - > Option 5: https://review.openstack.org/403830 - add resolution requiring > teams to accept driver contributions > - > One of Flavio’s preferred options > - > Option 6: https://review.openstack.org/403826 - add a resolution > allowing teams based on vendor-specific drivers > - > Flavio’s other preferred option [...] Worth noting, these map to options 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 from Doug's summary. His option #3 is missing above, which was: https://review.openstack.org/403838 - Stop requiring a level playing field That probably explains the numbering skew between the two summaries. -- Jeremy Stanley