[openstack-dev] [neutron]Do we need to rfe to implement active-active router?

huangdenghui hdh_1983 at 163.com
Fri Dec 2 13:11:05 UTC 2016


Hi Assaf
    I already file a RFE bug, please check bug#1645625. Any comment is welcome.


发自网易邮箱手机版



On 2016-11-17 01:32 , Assaf Muller Wrote:

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:42 AM, huangdenghui <hdh_1983 at 163.com> wrote:
> hi
>     Currently, neutron support DVR router and legacy router.  For high
> availability, there is HA router in reference implementation of legacy mode
> and DVR  mode. I am considering whether is active-active router needed in
> both mode?

Yes, an RFE would be required and likely a spec describing the high
level approach of the implementation.

>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20161202/6050a82e/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list