Open Stack

The ironic node-list --chassis seems to be easier to understand for me.
I've commented on one of the patches that maybe we should deprecate the
chassis-node-list if we add this, but then, the deprecation is slow, we
have some functional tests already... Having two commands kind of reflects
the duplication in our API, where we can do /chassis/<UUID>/nodes and
/nodes?chassis_uuid=<UUID>, so maybe having both of them is fine.

Vlad

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Loo, Ruby <ruby.loo at intel.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> While working on the openstackclient plugin commands for ironic, I was
> thinking about the equivalents for 'ironic chassis-node-list' (nodes that
> are part of specified chassis) and 'ironic-node-port-list' (ports that are
> part of specified node). It didn't make sense to me to have an 'openstack
> baremetal chassis node list', since a 'chassis' and a 'node' are two
> different objects in osc lingo and we already have 'openstack baremetal
> chassis xx' and 'openstack baremetal node yy' commands. Furthermore, our
> REST API supports 'GET /v1/nodes?chassis=c1' and 'GET /v1/ports?node=n1'.
>
>
>
> So I proposed 'openstack baremetal node list --chassis' and 'openstack
> baremetal port list --node' [1]. To implement this, I need to enhance our
> corresponding python APIs. The question I have is whether we want to only
> enhance the python API, or also provide 'ironic node-list --chassis' and
> 'ironic port-list --node' commands. The latter is being proposed [2] and
> coded at [3]. Doing this would mean two different ironic CLIs to do the
> same thing, but also provide a more obvious 1:1 correspondence between
> ironic & osc commands, and between ironic CLI and python API.
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> It'd be great if we could decide in the next day or so, in order to get
> the osc-related commands into the client this week for the Newton release.
>
>
>
> --ruby
>
>
>
> [1] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/
> approved/ironicclient-osc-plugin.html#openstack-baremetal-node
>
> [2] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1616242
>
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359520/
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160830/3fd7f3b5/attachment.html>