[openstack-dev] [all] versioning the api-ref?
Nikhil Komawar
nik.komawar at gmail.com
Thu Aug 18 15:57:02 UTC 2016
I guess the intent was to indicate the need for indicating the micro or
in case of Glance minor version bump when required.
The API isn't drastically different, there are new and old elements as
shown in the Nova api ref linked.
On 8/12/16 5:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 08/11/2016 06:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>> I have a question about the api-ref. Right now, for example, the new
>> images v1/v2 api-refs are accurate for Mitaka. But DocImpact bugs are
>> being generated as we speak for changes in master that won't be
>> available to consumers until Newton is released (unless they build from
>> source). If those bug fixes get merged, then the api-ref will no longer
>> be accurate for Mitaka API consumers (since it's published upon update).
> I'm confused about this statement.
>
> Are you saying that the Glance v2 API in Mitaka and Newton are different
> in some user visible ways? But both are called the v2 API? How does an
> end user know which to use?
>
> The assumption with the api-ref work is that the API document should be
> timeless (branchless), and hence why building from master is always
> appropriate. That information works for all time.
>
> We do support microversion markup in the document, you can see some of
> that in action here in the Nova API Ref -
> http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=list-servers-detail
>
>
> -Sean
>
--
Thanks,
Nikhil
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list