Excerpts from Erno Kuvaja's message of 2016-08-11 12:26:59 +0100: > Hi all, > > As follow up on the mailing list discussion [0], gerrit activity > [1][2] and cinder 3rd party CI policy [3] I'd like to initiate > discussion how Cinder follows, or rather does not follow, the standard > deprecation policy [4] as the project has been tagged on the assert > page [5]. > > I'm not here to argue about the justification or rightfulness of the > Cinder policy regarding the drivers with 3rd party CI. (quite frankly > I think the Cinder policy makes lots of sense and thus propose the > removal of the tag rather than change of that policy) Just stating the > obvious that the Cinder policy does not comply with the > follows-standard-deprecation and thus the tag should be removed from > Cinder. > > Best, > Erno (jokke) Kuvaja > > [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/100717.html > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348032/ > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348042/ > [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers > [4] https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/assert_follows-standard-deprecation.html#requirements > [5] https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/assert_follows-standard-deprecation.html#application-to-current-projects > Can you be more specific about what you mean? Are you saying that the policy isn't being followed because the drivers were removed without a deprecation period, or is there something else to it? Doug